A Poetics of Politics in Pushkin’s Poem Angelo

Occupation: Leading Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Russian Literature (the Pushkin House) RAS
Address: Makarov Embankment 4, St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

Journal name

Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka

Edition

Volume 77 Issue 6

Pages

22-35

Abstract

Yury Lotman introduced the thought-provoking idea that the plot of Pushkin’s poem “Angelo” evokes the popular nineteenth-century Russian legend about the emperor Alexander I; namely, that Alexander I had not died in 1825, but changed his name and kept living as a hermit (starets) in Siberia. The article aims at answering the question whether Angelo, in his turn, is modeled after the emperor Nicholas I. The article answers this question in the affirmative. Whereas Duke might be seen as an allusion to Alexander I, the character of Angelo is a cryptographic image of Nicholas I. Pushkin’s use of crypto-poetics can be accounted for by the fact that, back then, the poet was much obliged to the tsar and was in no position to openly critiсize him.

Keywords

poetics, politics, Pushkin, Shakespeare, “Angelo”, poem, Alexander I, Nicholas I

Received

25.12.2018

Publication date

25.12.2018

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Kibalnik S. A Poetics of Politics in Pushkin’s Poem “Angelo” // Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka – 2018. – V. 77. – Issue 6 C. 22-35 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://izv-oifn.ru/S241377150003059-7-1 (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S241377150003059-7
MLA	Kibalnik, Sergej "A Poetics of Politics in Pushkin’s Poem “Angelo”." Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 77.6 (2018):22-35. DOI: 10.31857/S241377150003059-7
APA	Kibalnik S. (2018). A Poetics of Politics in Pushkin’s Poem “Angelo”. Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 77(6), pp.22-35 DOI: 10.31857/S241377150003059-7

Price publication: 0

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1345

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. A.S. Pushkin in Reminiscences of Contemporaries in 2 Vols. Ed. 3. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, 1998. 528 p. (In Russ.)

2. Belinskij, V.G. The Complete Works in 13 Vols. Vol. 7. Moscow, 1955. 826 p. (In Russ.)

3. Grigoryev, A. Comments on the Attitude of Modern Criticism to Art. Moskvityanin, 1855. No. 13–14. P. 107–148. (In Russ.)

4. Storozhenko, N. Pushkin’s Attitude to Foreign Literature. Wreath at the Monument to Pushkin. St. Petersburg, 1880. P. 223–227. (In Russ.)

5. Tomashevskiy, B.V. Pushkin. Book 2. Leningrad, 1961. 575 p. (In Russ.)

6. Zaharov, N. Shakespeare in the Creative Evolution of Pushkin. Jyväskylä University Printing House, 2003. 283 p. (In Russ.)

7. Lotman, Yu.M. The Ideological Structure of the Poem by Pushkin “Angelo”. Pushkin collection. Pskov, 1973. P. 3–23. (In Russ.)

8. Cherniyaev, N.I. Critical Articles and Notes about Pushkin. Kharkov, 1900. 639 p. (In Russ.)

9. Gessen, S. Arakcheev in Pushkin’s Poem. Matinees. Petrograd, 1922. Book 2. P. 78–79. (In Russ.)

10. Vasilich, G. Emperor Alexander I and the Elder Theodore Kuzmich. Ed. 4. Moscow, 1911. 155 p. (In Russ.)

11. Kudryashov, K.V. Alexander the First and the Secret of Theodore Kuzmich. Petrograd, 1923. 96 p. (In Russ.)

12. Listov, V.S. Pushkin: the Fate of the Indigenous Poet. Big Boldino, Arzamas, 2012. 398 p. (In Russ.)

13. Pushkin, A.S. The Complete Works in 16 Vols. Moscow, Leningrad, 1937–1959. (In Russ.)

14. Belyj, A. “Angelo”: between Freedom and Mercy. Pushkin in the Twenty-first Century. Moscow, 2006. P. 140–169. (In Russ.)

15. Mandelshtam, O.E. About the Interlocutor. Mandelshtam, O.E. The Collection Works in 4 Vols. Moscow, 1993, Vol. 2. P. 182–187. (In Russ.)

16. Arhangelskij, A.N. Heroes of Pushkin. Essays of Literary Characterology. Moscow, 1999. 286 p. (In Russ.)

17. Gurevich, A.M. “Free Element”: Articles on Works by Pushkin. Moscow, 2015. 376 p. (In Russ.)

18. Kibalnik, S.A. Pushkin’s Artistic Philosophy. St. Petersburg, 1998. 199 p. (In Russ.)

19. Veresajev, V. Works in 4 Vols. Vol. 4. Moscow, 1990. 558 p. (In Russ.)

20. Levin, Yu.D. Shakespeare and Russian Literature of the XIX Century. Leningrad, 1988. 326 p. (In Russ.)

21. Dolinin, A.A. Pushkin and England. Moscow, 2007. 280 p. (In Russ.)

22. Makogonenko, G.P. Creativity of A.S. Pushkin in the 1830s (1833–1836). Leningrad, 1982. 463 p. (In Russ.)

23. Nikitenko, A.V. A Diary in 3 Vols. Vol. 1. Leningrad, 1955. 651 p. (In Russ.)

24. Surat, I. Yesterday’s Sun. About Pushkin and the Pushkinists. Moscow, 2009. 652 p. (In Russ.)

25. Shilder, N. Emperor Nicholas I: His Life and Reign. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, 1900. 800 p. (In Russ.)

26. Lutsevich, L. “I will speak, as I myself saw, I felt – from my heart ...”: Nikolas I about Russian Politics. Text and Tradition, Almanac 6. St. Petersburg, 2018. P. 107–127. (In Russ.)

27. Levkovich, Ya.L. Lyceum “Anniversaries”. Pushkin’s Poems 1820–1830s. History of Creation and Ideological and Artistic Problems. Leningrad, 1974. P. 71–107. (In Russ.)

28. Pushkin, A.S. The Complete Works in 10 Vols. Ed. 4. Vol. 4. Leningrad, 1977. 447 p. (In Russ.)

29. Pushkin and his Contemporaries: Materials and Research. Iss. 29–30. Petrograd., 1918. 235 p.(In Russ.)

30. Shakespeare, W. Measure for Measure. Introduction by Brian Gibbons. Cambridge, 1991. 213 p.

31. Porti, S. Law and Mercy: Shakespeare’s “Measure for Measure” and Pushkin’s “Angelo”. Graduate Essays on Slavic Languages and Literature. Ed. by Mark Altshuller. Pittsburg, 1993. P. 45–59. (In Russ.)

32. Vickery, Walter. Pushkin’s Andzhelo: A Problem Piece. In: Mnemozina. Studia litteraria russica in honorem V. Setchkarev. München, [1974]. P. 325–339.

33. Shakspeare W. Oeuvres complètes. Traduites de l’anglais par Letourneur. Nouvelle édition, revue et corrigée par F. Guizot et A.P., traducteur de Lord Byron. Paris, 1821. T. VIII. (In French).