Between Ibsen and Dostoevsky: Rewriting the Classics in Z. N. Gippius’ Story Mirrors

Occupation: Leading Researcher
Affiliation: A. M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka

Edition

Volume 82 Issue 6

Pages

16-22

Abstract

Z.N. Gippius’ story “Mirrors” was repeatedly correlated with the plot of F.M. Dostoevsky’s novel Idiot in lifetime criticism and the latest literature. The paper discovers the second source text, which is H. Ibsen’s play “Hedda Gabler.” Comparing the plot details of Dostoevsky’s novel and Ibsen’s drama, we can reveal “male” and “female” love triangles (Myshkin – Nastasya Filippovna – Aglaya, Nastasya Filippovna – Myshkin – Rogozhin; Levborg – Gedda – Thea; Raisa – Jan – Samokhin, Jan – Raisa – Olga). The reinterpretation of plot collisions in “Mirrors” may be considered from the psychological and religious-philosophical point of view. The paper provides with nearly word-by-word textual overlaps in the story with the mentioned sources. The analysis shows that the fundamental difference between the love triangles in Z. Gippius’ story in comparison with the previous tradition is that Gippius is trying to destroy the situation of inevitable choice for her characters. She reinterpreted and rewrote anew the plots of Dostoevsky and Ibsen, while the main characters changing their roles and the triangles collapsing at the end. No Gippius neither Merezhkovsky have articulated the philosophy of a religiously meaningful “triple union” as a form of realization of the “Third Testament” at the time of writing the story. The story “Mirrors” rewrites of the classics and the latest literature destructing of the traditional plots, though not completing and rethinking: the story has an open ending, the ideas of a triple alliance are unfinished. The article conclusion offers the hypothesis that the title of the story itself is not only Plato’s idea of the human existence world as a multiple reflection of the true ideal world in crooked mirrors, which is repeatedly articulated by its characters. It is also the formulated metapoetic principle of creating the text of the story itself, which is built on multiple reflections of familiar literary images and plot situations.

Keywords

Z.N. Gippius, F.M. Dostoevsky, H. Ibsen, “Mirrors,” Idiot, “Hedda Gabler,” rewriting of the plot, philosophy of the “triple alliance,” religion of the “Third Testament

Acknowledgment

The work was carried out at IWL RAS with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 23-28-01070).

Received

22.01.2024

Publication date

29.01.2024

Number of characters

16938

Cite

GOST	Magomedova D. Between Ibsen and Dostoevsky: “Rewriting the Classics” in Z. N. Gippius’ Story “Mirrors” // Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka – 2024. – V. 82. – Issue 6 C. 16-22 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://izv-oifn.ru/S160578800029101-7-1 (circulation date: 20.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S160578800029101-7
MLA	Magomedova, Dina М. "Between Ibsen and Dostoevsky: “Rewriting the Classics” in Z. N. Gippius’ Story “Mirrors”." Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 82.6 (2024):16-22. DOI: 10.31857/S160578800029101-7
APA	Magomedova D. (2024). Between Ibsen and Dostoevsky: “Rewriting the Classics” in Z. N. Gippius’ Story “Mirrors”. Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 82(6), pp.16-22 DOI: 10.31857/S160578800029101-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 54

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bibliograficheskiy otdel [Bibliographic department]. Russkaya mysl [Russian Thought]. 1896, No. 12, Pag. 3, p. 592.

2. Azadovsky, K.M., Lavrov, A.V. Z.N. Gippius: metafizika, lichnost’, tvorchestvo [Z.N. Gippius: Metaphysics, Personality, Works]. Gippius, Z.N. Sochineniia: Stikhotvoreniia. Proza [Works: Poems, Prose]. Leningrad, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1991, pp. 3‒44. (In Russ.)

3. Tamarchenko, N.D. Russkaia povest Serebrianogo veka: Problemy poetiki siuzheta i zhanra [Russian Story of the Silver Age: The Problems of Plot and Genre Poetics]. Moscow, Intrada Publ., 2007. 256 p. (In Russ.)

4. Pild, L. Zinaida Gippius i Ivan Turgenev [Zinaida Gippius and Ivan Turgenev]. K 70-letiiu Z.G. Mints [To the 70th Anniversary of Z.G. Mints]. Tartu, University of Tartu Publ., 1998, pp. 86‒118. (In Russ.)

5. Zhirmunsky, V.M. Bairon i Pushkin: Pushkin i zapadnye literatury [Byron and Pushkin: Pushkin and the Western Literatures]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1978. 424 p. (In Russ.)

6. Magomedova, D.M. Idillicheskii i demonicheskii tip geroin’ v russkoi literature XIX – nachala XX vv.: Konstanty i transformatsii [Idyllic and Demonic Types of Women Characters in Russian Literature of the 19th ‒ Early 20th Centuries: Constants and Transformations]. Shkola teoreticheskoi poetiki: Sbornik nauchnykh trudov k 70-letiiu Natana Davidovicha Tamarchenko [School of Theoretical Poetics: Collection of Scholar Works for the 70th Anniversary of Natan Davidovich Tamarchenko]. Moscow, Kulagina, Intrada Publ., 2010, pp. 129‒136. (In Russ.)/

7. Ibsen, G. Sobranie sochinenii: v 4 t. [Collected Works: in 4 Vols.]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1956‒1958. (In Russ.)

8. Gippius, Z.N. Sobranie sochinenii [Collected Works]. T. 2: Sumerki dukha. Roman. Povesti. Rasskazy. Stikhotvoreniia [Vol. 2: Twilight of the Spirit. A Novel. Stories. Short Stories. Poems]. Moscow, Russkaia kniga Publ., 2001. 560 p. (In Russ.)

9. Dostoevsky, F.M. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 t. [Complete Works: in 30 Vols.]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1972‒1990. (In Russ.)