A History of Cohesion: from M. O. Gershenzon’s The Poet’s Vision to V. Weidlé’s Les Abeilles d’Aristée

Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation: A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Povarskaya 25 а, Moscow, 121069, Russia

Journal name

Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka

Edition

Volume 82 Issue 3

Pages

5-13

Abstract

The paper is devoted to perception in the theory of literature of the famous statement of Leo Tolstoy about “cohesion” that ensure wholeness of narrative in a novel. Tolstoy’s idea of “cohesion” has repeatedly inspired various interpretations in literary criticism (for instance, M.O. Gershenzon, V.B. Shklovsky, B.M. Eikhenbaum, T. Rainov, and others). There are two contrary positions on the interpretation of the idea of “cohesion”: M.O. Gershenzon’s intuition theory of and in the formal method of V.B. Shklovsky. In the theory of M.O. Gershenzon the “cohesion” become the foundation of the principle of slow reading and expresses the points of correlation between personal vision of author and reader. In V.B. Shklovsky’s theory the “cohesion” is a technique, an element of narration in a fairy tale, short story, novel, etc; and character subjectivity is defined by the function of narration technique. In the 1930s V. Weidlé reconsidered the development of the aesthetics of the first third of the 20th century, showing key changes in literature and art. During this period, it’s observed the disappearance of the individual from the system of views on the nature of literary work, massive influence of analytical approaches, both in literary criticism and in literature itself, fragmentation of wholeness of literary work in aesthetic perception and replicating its techniques. Researchers still often consider to the idea of “cohesion” through Shklovsky’s theory, that inevitably creates distortion in the apprehension of Tolstoy’s aesthetics.

Keywords

“cohesion”, aesthetics, Leo Tolstoy, M.O. Gershenzon, H. Bergson, V.B. Shklovsky, V. Weidlé, slow reading, Russian formalism

Acknowledgment

This paper was prepared with financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 23-28-00450 “Wholeness / Fragmentation: L. Tolstoy’s Aesthetics in Philosophical Criticism and Theory of Literature in the First Third of the 20th Century”, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-28-00450/

Received

27.06.2023

Publication date

28.06.2023

Number of characters

22597

Cite

GOST	Smirnova N. A History of “Cohesion”: from M. O. Gershenzon’s “The Poet’s Vision” to V. Weidlé’s “Les Abeilles d’Aristée” // Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka – 2023. – V. 82. – Issue 3 C. 5-13 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://izv-oifn.ru/S160578800026309-5-1 (circulation date: 15.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S160578800026309-5
MLA	Smirnova, Natalia "A History of “Cohesion”: from M. O. Gershenzon’s “The Poet’s Vision” to V. Weidlé’s “Les Abeilles d’Aristée”." Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 82.3 (2023):5-13. DOI: 10.31857/S160578800026309-5
APA	Smirnova N. (2023). A History of “Cohesion”: from M. O. Gershenzon’s “The Poet’s Vision” to V. Weidlé’s “Les Abeilles d’Aristée”. Izvestiia Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Seriia literatury i iazyka 82(3), pp.5-13 DOI: 10.31857/S160578800026309-5

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 154

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Tolstoy, L.N. Sobranie sochinenii [Works in 22 Мols.]. Vol. 17–18. Pisma [Letters]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1984. 910, [1] p. (In Russ.)
2. Gershenzon, M.O. Posleslovie. Lanson G. Metod v istorii literatury [Afterword to Gustave Lanson’s Method in the History of Literature], Transl. and Afterword by M. Gershenzon. Moscow, T-vo Mir Publ., 1911, pp. 48–76. (In Russ.)
3. Gershenzon, M.O. Videnie poeta [The Poet’s Vision]. Moscow, 2-ia Tip. Lit. M.G.S.N.Kh. Publ., 1919. 80 p. (In Russ.)
4. Rainov, T. Estetika Tolstogo i ego iskusstvo [Aesthetics of Tolstoy and his Art]. Estetika Lva Tolstogo [Aesthetics of Leo Tolstoy], Ed. P.N. Sakulin. Moscow, GAKhN Publ., 1929, pp. 27–92. (In Russ.)
5. Eiges, I. Vozzrenie Tolstogo na muzyku [Tolstoy’s View of Music]. Estetika Lva Tolstogo [Aesthetics of Leo Tolstoy], Ed. P.N. Sakulin. Moscow, GAKhN Publ., 1929, pp. 241–308. (In Russ.)
6. Veidle, V. Umiranie iskusstva [Dying of Art], Ed. V.M. Tolmachev. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 2001. 447 p. (In Russ.)
7. Kovelman, A.B., Gershovich, U. Sokrytoe i iavlennoe v Talmude: Ocherk nefilosofskogo myshleniia na iskhode antichnosti [The Talmud Hidden and Reveled: Non-Philosophical Thinking in Late Antiquity]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2016. 448 p. (In Russ.)
8. Nikolaeva, T.M. Viktor Shklovskii – Lev Tolstoi – Marsel Prust [Viktor Shklovsky – Leo Tolstoy – Marcel Proust]. Epokha “ostraneniiaˮ. Russkii formalizm i sovremennoe gumanitarnoe znanie [The Era of “Estrangementˮ. Russian Formalism and the Modern Humanities]. Moscow, Novoe lit. obozrenie Publ., 2017, pp. 543–561. (In Russ.)
9. Romanova, G.I., Tyszkowska-Kasprzak, E. L. Tolstoi i formalisty o siuzhete [L. Tolstoy and the Formalists about the Plot]. Novyi filologicheskii vestnik [New Philological Bulletin]. 2021, No. 3 (58), pp. 52–64. (In Russ.)
10. Iskusstvo medlennogo chteniia: Istoriia, traditsiia, sovremennost [The Art of Slow Reading: History, Tradition, Modernity], Ed. N.N. Smirnova. Moscow, Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiia Publ., 2020. 368 p. (In Russ.)
11. Gershenzon, M.O. Izbrannoe [Selected Works, in 4 Vols. Vol. 4]. Moscow, Jerusalem, Universitetskaya kniga, Gesharim Publ., 2000. 640 p. (In Russ.)
12. Shklovsky, V. Sviaz priemov siuzhetoslozheniia s obshchimi priemami stilia [Connection of Plot Composition Techniques with General Style Techniques]. Poetika. Sborniki po teorii poeticheskogo iazyka [Poetics. Proceedings on the Theory of Poetic Language]. St. Petersburg [Petrograd], 18-ia Gosudarstvennaia tipografiia Publ., 1919, pp. 115–150. (In Russ.)
13. Shklovsky, V. O teorii prozy [Theory of Prose]. Moscow, Federatsiia Publ., 1929. 266 p. (In Russ.)
14. Bergson, H. La pensée et le mouvant. P.: Alcan, 1934. 322 [2] p. (In French)
15. Bergson, A. Mysl i dvizhushcheesia. Statji i vystupleniia [Thought and Movement]. Moscow; St. Petersburg, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ., 2019. 272 p. (In Russ.)
16. Schopenhauer, A. Sobranie sochinenii [Works, in 6 Vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Terra-Knizhnyi klub Publ., 1999. 496 p. (In Russ.)
17. Shklovsky, V. Tretia fabrika [Third Factory]. Moscow, Artel pisatelei KRUG Publ., 1926. 141 p. (In Russ.)
18. Eikhenbaum, B.M. Kak sdelana “Shinel” Gogolia [How Gogol’s “Overcoat” Was Made]. Poetika. Sborniki po teorii poeticheskogo iazyka [Poetics. Proceedings on the Theory of Poetic Language]. St. Petersburg [Petrograd]., 18-ia Gosudarstvennaia tipografiia Publ., 1919, pp. 151–165. (In Russ.)
19. Tolstoy, L.N. Sobranie sochinenii [Works in 22 Vols.]. Vol. 15. Statji ob iskusstve i literature [Articles on Art and Literature]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1983. 432, [1] p. (In Russ.)
20. Eikhenbaum, B.M. O proze. O poezii [On Prose. On Poetry], Ed. O. Eikhenbaum, G. Bialyi. Leningrad, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1986. 456 p. (In Russ.)
21. Romanova, G.I. L.N. Tolstoi o literature: istoriia i perspektivy izucheniia [Tolstoy on Literature: History and Prospects of Study]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [The Kostroma State University Bulletin]. 2020, No. 1, Vol. 26, pp. 138–143. DOI 10.34216/1998-0817-2020-26-1-138-143 (In Russ.)
22. Research Department of Manuscripts of the Russian State Library [OR RGB]. Stock 746. (M.O. Gershenzon). List 10. Dos. 40. (In Russ.)
23. Smirnova, N.N. Issledovatelskie printsipy i iazyk M.O. Gershenzona-teoretika [Research Principles and Language of M.O. Gershenzon Literary Theorist]. Gershenzon M.O. Demony glukhonemye. Statji, esse, zametki raznykh let [Deafmute Demons. Articles, Essays, Notes], Ed. N.N. Smirnova. Moscow; St. Petersburg, Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ Publ., 2017, pp. 299–328. (In Russ.)
24. Maude, Aylmer. Tolstoy and His Problems. L.: Grant Richards, 1901. 333 p.
25. Obolevitch, Teresa. Faith and Science in Russian Religious Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 67–72.
26. Kaufman, Andrew D. Understanding Tolstoy. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2011. xiii, 322 p.
27. Orwin, Donna Tussing. Tolstoy’s Art and Thought, 1847–1880. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993. 269 p.
28. Shklovsky, V. Razvertyvanie siuzheta [Plot Development]. St. Petersburg [Petrograd.], OPOIaZ Publ., 1921. 61 p. (In Russ.)
29. Shklovsky, V. Iskusstvo kak priem [Art as Device]. Poetika. Sborniki po teorii poeticheskogo iazyka [Poetics. Proceedings on the Theory of Poetic Language]. St. Petersburg [Petrograd], 18-ia Gosudarstvennaia tipografiia Publ., 1919, pp. 101–114. (In Russ.)