On the Semantics of Russian Verbal Circumfixes

 
PIIS013161170027460-5-1
DOI10.31857/S013161170027460-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Junior Research Fellow
Affiliation: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Science
Address: Russia, Moscow
Journal nameRusskaya Rech’
EditionIssue 4
Pages25-39
Abstract

Russian verbal circumfixes have been a topic of interest among linguists for a while now, with different approaches taken to their analysis. While some researchers consider semantics of the circumfixes in conjunction with Aktionsart prefixes, others debate whether circumfixes should be treated as a combination of a prefix and a suffix or as distinct single-piece derivations, thus questioning their status as derivations. These authors often do not dive deep into the semantics of the analyzed circumfixes, focusing more on the formal morphological issues. In this paper, I propose a different perspective by examining the aspectual semantics of Russian verbal circumfixes in a typological context. Having analyzed the two-component structure of circumfixes, the article argues that circumfixes convey semantics of getting into a certain state (distinct from the resulting state) as a consequence of the activity encoded by the verbal root. The properties of this particular state are determined by the prefixal part of the circumfix. The study focuses on three specific circumfixes, namely do-...-sja, na-...-sja, and raz-...-sja, but the analysis also extends to other verbal circumfixes. This paper contributes to our understanding of the grammatical semantics of Russian verbal circumfixes and their morphological status as a distinct construction. The findings shed light on the aspectual semantics and the role of prefixal parts in determining the meaning of Russian verbal circumfixes.

Keywordscircumfixes, completive aspect, grammatical semantics, verbal aspect, verbal prefixes
Received04.10.2023
Publication date04.10.2023
Number of characters20658
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 151

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bondarko A. V., Bulanin L. L. Russkii glagol [Russian verb]. Leningrad, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1967. 190 p.

2. Dobrushina E. R., Mellina E. A., Paiar D. Russkie pristavki: mnogoznachnost' i semanticheskoe edinstvo [Russian prefixes: polysemy and the semantic unity]. Moscow, Russkie Slovari Publ., 2001. 270 p.

3. Hopper, P. J., Thompson, S. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, vol. 56, 1980, pp. 251–299.

4. Kiseleva K. L., Tatevosov S. G. [‘gulyal’ – ‘nagulyal’ – ‘nagulyalsya’. Towards the structure of prefix-postfix verbs]. Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii: Po materialam konferentsii Dialog-2015 [Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies: Based on the materials of the Dialogue-2015 conference]. V. 14. Moscow, RSUH Publ., 2015, pp. 272–283. (In Russ.)

5. Krongauz M. A. Pristavki i glagoly v russkom yazyke: semanticheskaya grammatika [Prefixes and verbs in Russian: the semantic grammar]. Moscow, Shkola “Yazyki Russkoi Kul'tury” Publ., 1998. 286 p.

6. Krongauz M. A., Paiar D. Glagol'naya prefiksatsiya v russkom yazyke [Verbal prefixation in Russian]. Moscow, Russkie Slovari Publ., 1997. 220 p.

7. Mel’čuk I. Un affixe derivationnel et un phrasème syntaxique du russe moderne. Revue des Études Slaves, 1987, vol. 59, pp. 631–648.

8. Musinova T. V. [Semantic description of Russian verbal prefix raz-]. Trudy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii Dialog-2003. [Proceedings of the international conference Dialogue-2003]. Moscow, 2003, pp. 455–457. (In Russ.)

9. Nedoluzhko A. Yu., Khoroshkina A. S. “Vchera nasochinyalsya vorokh strok”: Productive circumfixal intensifying patterns in Russian. Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii. Po materialam konferentsii Dialog-2014. [Computational linguistics and intellectual technologies: Based on the materials of the Dialogue-2014 conference]. V. 1, no. 1. Moscow, RSUH Publ., 2014, pp. 449–460. (In Russ.)

10. Vendler, Z. Verbs and times. The philosophical review, 66 (2), 1957, pp. 143–160.

11. Volokhina G. A., Popova Z. D. Russkie glagol'nye pristavki: semanticheskoe ustroistvo, sistemnye otnosheniya [Russian verbal prefixes: semantics and distribution]. Voronezh, Voronezh Univ. Publ., 1993. 196 p.

12. Yanda L. A. [Russian prefixes as verbal classifiers]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2012, no. 6, pp. 3–47. (In Russ.)

13. Yu Chul Chzhon. [Spatial and non-spatial semantics of raz- -sya confix]. Issledovaniya po teorii grammatiki [Research on grammar theory]. V. 2. Moscow, 2002, pp. 295–331. (In Russ.)

14. Yu Chul Chzhon. [Semantic description of the Russian na- -sya confix]. Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiya: Sb. statei / V. V. Krasnykh, A. I. Izotov (ed.) [Language, consciousness, communication: Col. of articles / V. V. Krasnykh, A. I. Izotov (eds.)]. Moscow, MAKS Press, 2002a, v. 21. pp. 24–41. (In Russ.)

15. Zaliznyak, Anna A.; Shmelev, A. D. Vvedenie v russkuyu aspektologiyu [Introducing Russian aspectology]. Moscow, Yazyki Slavyanskikh Kul'tur Publ., 2000. 221 p.

16. Zevakhina N. A. [Circumfixes as markers of the valence change]. Struktury i interpretatsii: Raboty molodykh issledovatelei po teoreticheskoi i prikladnoi lingvistike. F. I. Dudchuk, N. V. Ivlieva, A. V. Podobryaev (red.). [Structures and Interpretations: Works of Young Researchers in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics. F. I. Dudchuk, N. V. Ivlieva, A. V. Podobryaev (eds.). Moscow, Moscow St. Univ. Publ., 2007, pp. 64–85. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up