What Has Changed Za Eti Paru Desyatkov Let (‘Over These Two Couples of Decades’) in the Agreement

 
PIIS013161170025484-1-1
DOI10.31857/S013161170025484-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Linguistics University of Nizhny Novgorod
Address: Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod
Journal nameRusskaya Rech’
EditionIssue 2
Pages56-69
Abstract

The research conducted on Russian written texts studies the phenomenon of the mass use of the plural form of attributes in the case of their agreement with the word form para as part of a quantitative-nominal turn with the meaning of an indefinite quantity. This meaning of the word para is realized when combined with dependent words denoting time periods. The author notes the most frequent constructions with various prepositional-nominals forms of the noun para, in which there are fluctuations in the choice of the grammatical number of the attribute. The research material is media and literary texts in Russian. The sources of the research are the National Corpus of the Russian Language and the electronic media bank Integrum (Media Archive service). The reasons for the speaker's preferential choice of the plural form (za eti paru let) instead of the normative singular are primarily linguistic. The effect of the tendency to semantic agreement and the analogy with the type of agreement implemented in the case of semantically similar turns neskol’ko dney, dva-tri dnya that require an attribute in a plural form belong to them. Extralinguistic factors are also important, and one of them is the reproduction of an error in a text repeatedly reprinted in various media. The study also examines the choice of the numerical form of the predicate with the subject para dney (let, etc.), which, as in the case of the attributes, varies. The author interprets the detected anomalies in the form of unexpressed grammatical markers of gender and case, which are clearly not of a singular nature, as a process of lexicalization of a turn with the word para ‘a few’.

Keywordssemantic agreement, formal agreement, coordination, Russian language, quantitative-nominal word-combination, quantitative substantive, semantics of uncertainty, numerical grammatical variants, attribute, predicate
Received27.06.2023
Publication date28.04.2023
Number of characters21417
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 159

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Chernyshev V. I. Slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka v 17 t. [Dictionary of modern Russian literary language in 17 vol.]. Moscow, Leningrad, The Academy of Science of Soviet Union Publ., 1959. Vol. 3. 1483 p.

2. Corbett G. G. Agreement (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006. 346 p.

3. Evgen'eva A. P. (ed.). Slovar’ russkogo yazyyka: v 4 t. [Dictionary of Russian language: in 4 vol.]. Moscow, Russian Language Publ.,1987. Vol. 3. 752 p.

4. Fasmer M. Etimologichesky slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Etymological dictionary of Russian language: in 4 vol. (Russ. ed.: Trubachev O. N.)]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987. Vol. 3. 832 p.

5. Gerasimova A. A., Lyutikova E. A. [Agreeing and substantivized adjectives in Russian paucal constructions: An experimental study]. Rhema. Rema, 2018, no. 4, pp. 50–61. (In Russ.)

6. Glinkina G. V., Martinets M. S., Zorina V. L. Edinstvo yazykov v ikh mnogoobrazii: skazuemoe v russkom i inostrannykh yazykakh [The unity of languages in their diversity: predicate in Russian and foreign languages]. Krasnoyarsk, KKIPKI PPRO Publ., 2011. 215 p.

7. Graudina L. K., Katlinskaya L. P., Itskovich V. A. Slovar’ grammaticheskikh variantov russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of grammatical variants of Russian language]. Moscow, Astrel’ Publ., AST Publ., 2008. 555 p.

8. Kopeliovich A. B. Rod i grammatika mezhslovnykh sintaksicheskikh svyazey [Gender and grammar of inter-word syntactic relations]. Moscow, Vladimir, Inst. of Linguistics of the RAS&VGGU Publ., 2008. 147 p.

9. Kuvshinskaya Yu. M. [Predicate agreement with quantifier phrase in Russian (According to the data of the National Russian Corpus for the period of 2000–2010)]. Russkiy yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, 2013, no. 2 (26), pp. 112–150. (In Russ.)

10. Kuznetsov S. A. (ed.). Bol’shoy tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Big explanatory dictionary of Russian language]. Available at: http://gramota.ru/slovari/dic/?word=%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B0&all=x (accessed 12.12.2022). (In Russ.)

11. Marinova E. V. [New fields of variation of language units and establishment of the norm of modern Russian literary language]. Verkhnevolzhsky filologichesky vestnik, 2018, no. 3, pp. 83–92. (In Russ.)

12. Molotkov A. I. (ed.). Frazeologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Phraseological dictionary of the Russian language]. Moscow, Russian Language Publ., 1986. 543 p.

13. Plunguan V. A. Obshchaya morfologia: Vvedenie v problematiku [General morphology. Introduction to the problems]. Moscow, Knizhny Dom “Librokom” Publ., 2012. 384 p.

14. Rogacheva E. S. [Problem of selecting verb-predicate number form in the process of its agreement with quantitative noun phrases]. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2014, no. 2 (32), part 2, pp. 149–152. (In Russ.)

15. Rozental D. E. Spravochnik po pravopisaniu i literaturnoy pravke: dlya rabotnikov pechati [Handbook of spelling and literary editing: For press workers]. Moscow, Kniga Publ., 1989. 320 p.

16. Shulga M. V. [Evolution of Number Names in Modern Russian]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2. Yazykoznanie, 2019, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 88–104. (In Russ.) DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2019A7

17. Shvedova N. Yu. (ed.). Russkaya grammatika: v 2 t. [Russian grammar: in 2 vol.]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1980. 709 p.

18. Sidorova M. I. [Problems of variability of the agreement of the predicate number with the countable turn]. XXVIII Ezhegodnaya bogoslovskaya konferentsia “Aktual’nye problemy obshchego i sravnitel’no-istoricheskogo yazykoznania” [Proc. XXVIII Annual Theological Conf. “Actual problems of general and comparative-historical linguistics”]. Moscow, 2018, pp. 231–233. (In Russ.)

19. Valgina N. S. Aktivnye protsessy v russkom yazyke [Active processes in Russian language]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2003. 304 p.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up