Khlebo, Kresto and Payoko in Arkhangel’sk Dialects: Are they Conditioned by Phonetics?

 
PIIS013161170024704-3-1
DOI10.31857/S013161170024704-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russia, Moscow
Journal nameRusskaya Rech’
EditionIssue 1
Pages21-44
Abstract

The paper reports new findings concerning the distribution of Nom. and Acc. Sing. Musc. -o nominal forms and forms with postpositive particles -ot and -to in seven Northern Russian dialects spoken in the Pinezhsky, Plesetsky, Verkhnetoemsky, Mezensky, Leshukonsky and Vinogradovsky districts of Arkhangel’sk region based on the material of dialectal speech corpora and tape recordings of dialectal speech made in the period of 1987 – 1999 (total duration – 41,3 hours). The study reveals 1) an explicit mutual dependence of the -о and -оt forms in the dialects considered (the fraction of the -оt forms decrease significantly with the presence of -o forms), and 2) a clear tendency to the positional distribution of the -о and -оt forms depending on the right phonetic context (a pause, a vowel, a fricative or a plosive consonant) with the minimum number of the -оt forms before gomoranic stop consonants. This may serve as an essential argument in favor of the hypothesis suggesting the phonetic evolution whenever in the past of the -о forms from those of -ot, leading to the decay of the initial regular grammatical and/or phonetical agreement of a of Nom. and Acc. Musc. noun and the postpositive particle’s “correct” -ot form and to the extended distribution of uncoordinated -to form of the particle in this context.

KeywordsRussian Language, Northern-Russian Dialects, postpositive particles
Received29.03.2023
Publication date05.04.2023
Number of characters33117
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 222

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Knyazev S. V. Korpus govorov bassejna Verxnej Pinegi i Vy`i. 2021. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnaya laboratoriya yazy`kovoj konvergencii NIU VShE` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://lingconlab.ru/vaduga/ (data obrashheniya: 21.09.2022).

2. Knyazev S. V. Korpus govora sela Keba. 2022a. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnaya laboratoriya yazy`kovoj konvergencii, NIU VShE` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://lingconlab.ru/keba (data obrashheniya: 01.09.2022).

3. Knyazev S. V. Korpus govora sela Cerkovnoe. 2022b. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnaya laboratoriya yazy`kovoj konvergencii, NIU VShE` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://lingconlab.ru/tserkovnoe/ (data obrashheniya: 18.09.2022).

4. Knyazev S. V. Korpus govora Srednej Pyozy`. 2022v. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnaya laboratoriya yazy`kovoj konvergencii, NIU VShE` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://lingconlab.ru/pyoza (data obrashheniya: 03.10.2022).

5. Knyazev S.V. Korpus govorov srednego techeniya Severnoj Dviny`. 2023. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnaya laboratoriya yazy`kovoj konvergencii, NIU VShE` [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL: http://lingconlab.ru/dvina (data obrashheniya: 16.01.2023).

6. Byrd D. Preliminary results on speaker-dependent variation in the TIMIT database // J. acoust. Soc. Am., 1992, no. 92, pp. 593–596.

7. Davidson L. Characteristics of stop release in American English spontaneous speech. Speech Communication, 2011, no. 53, pp. 1042–1058.

8. Halle M., Hughes G. W., Radley J.-P. Acoustic properties of stop consonant // J. acoust. Soc. Am., 1957, no. 29, pp. 107–116.

9. Kalenchuk M. L. O foneticheskoy obuslovlennosti i orfoepicheskoy prikreplennosti [On the phonetic conditioning and orthoepic attachment]. Problemy fonetiki [Problems of phonetics]. Мoscow, Nauka Publ., 1993, pp. 67–75. (In Russ.)

10. Kasatkin L. L. Glasnye zvuki na kontse slova v sovremennykh severnorusskikh govorakh na meste redutsirovannykh glasnykh drevnerusskogo yazyka [Word-final vowels in modern North-Russian dialects representing reduced vowels in Old Russian] // Rusistika. Slavistika. Indoevropeistika [Russian, Slavic and Indo-European Studies]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 1996, pp. 243–255. (In Russ.)

11. Krys’ko V. B. Obshcheslavyanskie i drevnenovgorodskie formy Nom. Sg. masc. *o-skloneniya [The common Slavic and Old Novgorod forms of the Nom. Sg. masc. of the *o-declension] // Russian Linguistics, 1993, 17, рр. 119–196. (In Russ.)

12. Kuznetsov P. S. Russkaya dialektologiya [Russian dialectology]. Мoscow, Prosveshchenie Publ., 1960.

13. Lee H. B. Korean // J. Int. Phonet. Assoc., 1993, no. 23, pp. 25–28.

14. Pozharitskaya S. К. Russkaya dialektologiya [Russian dialectology]. Мoscow, Moscow State University Publ., 1997.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up