On a Case of Complete Lag Dissimilation  in Modern Standard Russian

The present paper reports some new results of the experimental research aimed at finding out whether the complete regressive lag dissimilation is possible for coronal vibrant [r] and labio-dental fricative/approximant [v] in a position before the same consonant in the following syllable in Modern Standard Russian.

The first experiment examined consonant cluster regressive lag dissimilation in two groups of words. The first group included words with consonant clusters with final [r] or [v] followed by the homorganic consonant in the next syllable (chyorstvogo, rasprostranyayutsya, chuvstvovat’, pervogo). The second group included words with the same consonant clusters but no homorganic consonant was present in the next syllable (chyorstvaya, rasprostirayutsya, chuvstvo, pervaya). Seventy-two speakers of Modern Standard Russian – students of Moscow State University from 18 up to 28 years of age – participated in the study. A total of 1129 tokens were manually analyzed using Praat software. Specifically, in order to detect the presence or absence of the target sounds, for labio-dental fricative/approximant [v], the second formant's and intensity values in a vocalic part of segment adjacent to dental stop [t] (e.g., chyorstvogo) or coronal vibrant (e.g., pervogo) were measured; for vibrant [r], the closure part was analyzed. The results showed that [v] consonant was absent in 74–91 % of cases in the words of the first group, but only in 3–7 % of cases in the words of the second group. Similarly, [r] was absent in 85–90 % in the words of the first group and 1–18 % in the words of the second group. Moreover, although the deletion of the cluster final [r] and [v] was detected in all clusters analyzed in this study, it is more likely to be observed in a cluster containing more than two consonants. Furthermore, the present findings demonstrated that the dissimilation might depend on the position of the word in a phrase, being more frequent for the words under phrase accent.

The follow-upexperimentwasdesigned to assess the effect of word stress on the complete regressive lagdissimilationoftheconsonantclusterwith labio-dental fricative/approximant [stv]. A total of 141 tokens from 72 Modern Russian speakers were obtained, the stimuli included two words kho'dataystvovat’ and torzhestvo'vat’ and were analyzed in PRAAT. The results showed that the dissimilation can be found more often before unstressed syllable than before the stressed one (91 % and 37 % of cases, respectively). Thus, in accordance with the initial hypothesis, the second experiment demonstrated that complete regressive lag dissimilation (consonant deletion) depends on the consonant cluster position in a word.

Keywords

Russian, phonetics, dissimilation

Received

28.12.2021

Publication date

28.12.2021

Number of characters

25661

Cite

GOST	Knyazev S. On a Case of Complete Lag Dissimilation in Modern Standard Russian // Russkaya Rech’ – 2021. – Issue 6 C. 31-49 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/rusrech/s013161170017966-1-1-en (circulation date: 24.07.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013161170017966-1
MLA	Knyazev, Sergey V "On a Case of Complete Lag Dissimilation in Modern Standard Russian." Russkaya Rech’ 6 (2021):31-49. DOI: 10.31857/S013161170017966-1
APA	Knyazev S. (2021). On a Case of Complete Lag Dissimilation in Modern Standard Russian. Russkaya Rech’ (6), pp.31-49 DOI: 10.31857/S013161170017966-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 425

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Nacional`ny`j korpus russkogo yazy`ka [E`lektronny`j resurs]. URL:www.ruscorpora.ru (data obrashheniya: 30.08.2021).

2. Bermúdez-Otero R. Diachronic phonology. In Paul de Lacy (ed.). The Cambridge handbook of phonology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 497–517.

3. Garrett A. Sound change. In: Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.). The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics. London, Routledge, 2015, pp. 227–248.

4. Garrett A., Johnson K. Phonetic bias in sound change. In: Alan C. L. Yu (ed.). Origins of sound change: approaches to phonologization. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 51–97.

5. Grishina E. A. Mul’timodal’nyi modul’ v sostave natsional’nogo korpusa russkogo yazyka [The multimodal module as part of the Russian national corpus]. Trudy Instituta russkogo yazyka imeni V. V. Vinogradova [Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute]. Vol. 6. Moscow, RLI RAS Publ., 2015, pp. 65–87. (In Russ.)

6. Kalenchuk M. L. O foneticheskoy obuslovlennosti i orfoepicheskoy prikreplennosti [On the phonetic conditioning and orthoepic attachment]. Problemy fonetiki [Problems of phonetics] I, Мoscow, Nauka Publ., 1993, pp. 67–75. (In Russ.)

7. Кasatkin L. L. (ed.), Kalenchuk M. L., Кasatkina R. F., Кasatkin L. L. Bol’shoy orfoepicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Large orthoepic dictionary of Russian]. Мoscow, АST-PRESS Publ., 2012. 1008 p.

8. Kodzasov S. V., Krivnova O. F. Obshchaya fonetika [General phonetics]. Moscow, RGGU Publ., 2001. 592 p.

9. Ohala J. The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie Masek, Roberta Hendrick & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago, Chicago Linguistics Society, 1981, pp. 178–203.

10. Ohala J. What’s cognitive, what’s not, in sound change. In: Günter Kellerman & Michael D. Morrissey (eds.), Diachrony within synchrony: language history and cognition. Frankfurt, Peter Lang, 1992, pp. 309–355.

11. Ohala J. The phonetics of sound change. In: Charles Jones (ed.), Historical linguistics: problems and perspectives. London, Longman, 1993, pp. 237–278.

12. Paufoshima R. F. Fonetika slova i frazy v severnorusskih govorah [Phonetics of word and phrase in Northern Russian dialects]. Moscow, Nauka, 1983. 110 p.

13. R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/

14. Raphael L. J., Borden G. J., Harris K. S. Speech science primer: Physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech: Third edition. Williams&Wilkins, 2012. 320 p.

15. Suzuki, K. A Typological investigation of dissimilation. University of Arizona: Doctoral dissertation, 1998. 222 p.

16. Zemskaya E. A. (ed.). Russkaya razgovornaya rech [Russian colloquial speеch]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973. 486 p.