views: 1241
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Alisov N. V. (1993), Geography of world science, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Seriya 5, Geografiya, no. 6, pp. 7–16. (In Russ.).
2. Baburin V. L., Zemtsov S. P. (2019), Theoretical and methodological approaches to economic and geographical research of innovative processes, Theoretical and methodological approaches in economic and social geography: collection of articles, eds. Baburin V. L., Savoskul M. S., Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow State University, pp. 6–45. (In Russ.).
3. Belyayev Ye. A., Pyshkova N. S. (1979), Formation and development of a network of scientific institutions of the USSR (historical outline), Moscow, Nauka, 245 p. (In Russ.).
4. Brumshteyn Y. M., Zakharyan M. Y. (2017), Distribution of scientists by Russian inhabited points and regions: comparison of official statistics data and information about printing activity, Internet-zhurnal “Naukovedenie”, no. 9 (4). (In Russ.). URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/39EVN417.pdf
5. Zamyatina N. Yu., Pilyasov A. N. (2016), Single-Industry Towns of Russia: Lock-In and Drivers of Innovative Search, Forsajt, no. 10 (3), pp. 53–64. (In Russ.).
6. Zemtsov S. P., Baburin V. L. (2017), How to assess an efficiency of regional innovation systems in Russia? Innovacii, no. 2 (220). pp. 60–66. (In Russ.).
7. Zemtsov S. P., Komarov V. M. (2015), Russian Regional Knowledge Economy Index, Innovacii, no. 10 (204), pp. 40–49. (In Russ.).
8. Kovalev Y. Y. (2002), Geography of world science, Moscow, Gardariki, 156 p. (In Russ.).
9. Kovalev Y. Y. (2009), Innovative regions in Europe, Regionalnye Issledovaniya, no. 6 (26), pp. 45–54. (In Russ.).
10. Kovalev Y. Y. (2001), Types of countries by the level of development of science, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, Seriya 5, Geografiya, no. 2, pp. 27–31. (In Russ.).
11. Pilyasov A. N. (2018), Peripheral innovation system: the case of the Arctic islands — “isolates”, Materials of the IX international scientific-practical conference “The North and the Arctic in a new paradigm of world development. Luzin Readings – 2018”, eds. Badylevicha R. V., Zalkind L. O. Apatity, pp. 87–88. (In Russ.).
12. Saushkin Yu. G. (1973), Economic geography: history, theory, methods, practice. Moscow, 559 p. (In Russ.).
13. Aksnes D. W., van Leeuwen T. N., Sivertsen G. (2014), The effect of booming countries on changes in the relative specialization index (RSI) on country level, Scientometrics, no. 101 (2), pp. 1391–1401.
14. Andersson D. E., Gunessee S., Matthiessen C. W., Find S. (2014), The geography of Chinese science, Environment and Planning A., no. 46 (12), pp. 2950–2971. DOI: 10.1068/a130283p
15. Asheim B., Grillitsch M., Trippl M. (2017), Introduction: Combinatorial Knowledge Bases, Regional Innovation, and Development Dynamics, Economic Geography, no. 93 (5), pp. 429–435.
16. Bergman E. M., Feser E. J. (2001), Innovation system effects on technological adoption in a regional value chain, European Planning Studies, no. 9 (5), pp. 629–648.
17. Blakely E. J., Hu R. (2019), Australian Cities in Competition, Crafting Innovative Places for Australia’s Knowledge Economy, eds. Blakely E., Hu R. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore, pp. 51–83.
18. Bornmann L., Leydesdorff L. (2012), Which are the best performing regions in information science in terms of highly cited papers? Some improvements of our previous mapping approaches, Journal of Informetrics, no. 6 (2), pp. 336–345. DOI:10.1016/j.joi.2011.11.002.
19. Bornmann L., Leydesdorff L. (2011), Which cities produce more excellent papers than can be expected? A new mapping approach, using google maps, based on statistical significance testing, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, no. 62 (10), pp. 1954–1962. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21611
20. Bornmann L., Leydesdorff L., Walch-Solimena C., Ettl C. (2011), Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data, Journal of Informetrics, no. 5 (4), pp. 537–546. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.005
21. Bornmann L., Waltman L. (2011), The detection of “hot regions” in the geography of science-A visualization approach by using density maps, Journal of Informetrics, no. 5 (4), pp. 547–553. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2011.04.006
22. Börsch A. (2019), Tech-hub-index: Comparison of German cities, Wirtschaftsdienst, no. 99 (10), pp. 711–716. DOI: 10.1007/s10273-019-2518-5
23. Csomós G. (2018), A spatial scientometric analysis of the publication output of cities worldwide, Journal of Informetrics, no. 12 (2), pp. 547–566. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.05.003
24. Csomós G. (2018), Factors influencing cities' publishing efficiency, Journal of Data and Information Science, no. 3 (3), pp. 43–80. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2018-0014.
25. Forés B., Camisón C. (2016), Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size?, Journal of Business Research, no. 69 (2). pp. 831–848.
26. Frenken K., Hoekman J. (2014), Spatial scientometrics and scholarly impact: a review of recent studies, tools, and methods, Measuring scholarly impact, eds. Ding Y, Rousseau R., Wolfram D., London, Springer, pp. 127–146.
27. Kazadi K., Lievens A., Mahr D. (2016), Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders, Journal of Business Research, no. 69 (2), pp. 525–540.
28. Lamorgese A., Petrella A. (2019), Stylized Facts on Italian Cities, Italian Economic Journal, no. 5 (2), pp. 223–249. DOI: 10.1007/s40797-019-00101-3
29. Lau A. K. W., Lo W. (2015), Regional innovation system, absorptive capacity and innovation performance: An empirical study, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, no. 92, pp. 99–114.
30. Maisonobe M., Eckert D., Grossetti M., Jégou L., Milard B. (2016), The world network of scientific collaborations between cities: domestic or international dynamics?, Journal of Informetrics. no. 10 (4), pp. 1025–1036.
31. Matthiessen C. W., Schwarz A. W. (1999), Scientific centres in Europe: An analysis of research strength and patterns of specialisation based on bibliometric indicators, Urban Studies, no. 36 (3), pp. 453–477. DOI: 10.1080/0042098993475
32. Stewart T. A. (1997), Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, New York — London, Doubleday / Currency, 278 p.
33. Stuck J., Broekel T., Revilla Diez J. (2016), Network Structures in Regional Innovation Systems, European Planning Studies, no. 24 (3), pp. 423–442.
34. Tanner A. N. (2018), Changing locus of innovation: a micro-process approach on the dynamics of proximity, European Planning Studies, no. 26 (12), pp. 2304–2322.
35. Van Noorden R. (2010), Cities: building the best cities for science. Which urban regions produce the best research — and can their success be replicated?, Nature, no. 467 (7318), pp. 906–908.
36. Wuestman M. L., Hoekman J., Frenken K. (2019), The geography of scientific citations. Research Policy, no. 48 (7), pp. 1771–1780. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.004.
37. Zhang F., Wu F. (2019), Rethinking the city and innovation: A political economic view from China's biotech, Cities, no. 85, pp. 150–155.
38. Zhou P., Thijs B., Glänzel W. (2009), Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output, Scientometrics, no. 81 (3), pp. 839–857. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-2255