Historical context in the light of science research (based on materials from the 2007 excavations in the Moscow Kremlin by the Institute of Archaeology RAS)

 
PIIS086960630011982-9-1
DOI10.31857/S086960630011982-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Deputy director for scientific work
Affiliation: Institute of Archaeology RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Affiliation: Center for Applied Isotope Studies at the University of Georgia
Address: USA
Occupation: head of Departament
Affiliation: Institute of Archaeology RAS
Address: 152-1-29 Generala Tuleneva st.
Occupation: Junior Research Fellow
Affiliation: Institute of Archaeology, RAS
Address: Moscow, Russia
Occupation: Senior Research Fellow
Affiliation: Institute of Archaeology Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russia
Affiliation: Institute of Archaeology RAS
Address: Moscow, Russia
Journal nameRossiiskaia arkheologiia
EditionIssue 2
Pages167-185
Abstract

The article examines the possibilities of natural science research in archaeology based on the case of a closed archaeological complex (structure 32) revealed during the 2007 excavations in the Taynitsky Garden of the Moscow Kremlin. The complex was formed at a time as a result of a fire and contains the remains of three people. Initially, based on the analysis of pottery material, it was dated to the first half of the 15th century. Studies of human bones carried out at the Center for Isotope Research at the University of Georgia made it possible to state that the structure perished between 1275 and 1395, probably as a result of the destruction of Moscow by the Tokhtamysh troops in August 1382. The use of science research methods made it possible to obtain additional information about the diet and the social status of individuals; the likelihood of their residence in Moscow during the last years of their life was analyzed.

Keywordsarchaeology, the Moscow Kremlin, science research methods, radiocarbon dating, isotope analysis (nitrogen, carbon, strontium), palaeobotany
Received28.06.2021
Publication date28.06.2021
Number of characters26939
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной
1 Археологические исследования на территории Московского Кремля крайне важны для специалистов и вызывают повышенный интерес, поскольку позволяют получить достоверную информацию о центре столицы небольшого удельного княжества, в будущем – Московского царства, до сих пор археологически изученного довольно слабо. Результаты раскопок Института археологии РАН под руководством Н.А. Макарова 2007 г. в Тайницком саду Московского Кремля (Панова, Коваль, 2007) (рис. 1) частично опубликованы (Коваль и др., 2017; Бужилова и др., 2019), что позволило переосмыслить и дополнить накопленный историко-культурный материал. В настоящей статье авторы вернулись к анализу уникального объекта, используя современные возможности естественнонаучных методов, поскольку возникли вопросы к хронологии и исторической интерпретации событий, приведших к образованию комплекса.
2
Рис.1_Энговатова_и_др_

Рис.1. Схема расположения раскопа 1 2007 г. в Тайницком саду Московского Кремля. Fig. 1. A layout of excavation site 1 of 2007 in the Taynitsky Garden of the Moscow Kremlin

3 При раскопках 2007 г. были выявлены следы усадебной застройки (рис. 2), существовавшей, по крайней мере, со второй половины XIII в. и впоследствии неоднократно изменявшейся (Дубровин, Коваль, 2014). В составе одного из объектов усадьбы (сооружение 32) были обнаружены обгоревшие останки трех человек, лежавшие на плетеной циновке на полу погреба и перекрытые слоем со следами крупного пожара. Датировка комплекса находок из этого строения основывалась на анализе керамического материала, отнесенного к первой половине XV в. (рис. 3, А), хотя среди находок обнаружены и фрагменты более ранней золотоордынской чаши второй половины XIV в. (Бужилова и др., 2019; Коваль, 2016. С. 444) (рис. 3, Б). Постройка со сгоревшими в пожаре и незахороненными людьми - исключительно редкий пример закрытого комплекса, отложившегося, фактически, моментально, что и заставляет вернуться к нему с целью уточнения даты и определения исторического контекста необычной для русского города находки.
4
Рис.2_Энговатова_и_др_

Рис. 2. Схема расположения сооружения 32 (по: Дубровин, Коваль, 2014. Рис. 18. С. 105). Fig. 2. A layout of structure 32 (after: Dubrovin, Koval, 2014. Fig. 18. P. 105.)

5
Рис.3

Рис. 3. Керамический материал из сооружения 32: А – сосуды и венчики, отнесенные к первой половине XV в.; Б – фрагменты золотоордынской чаши второй половины XIV в. Fig. 3. Pottery material from structure 32

6 Узкая датировка культурных слоев и закрытых комплексов средневековой Москвы остается непростой задачей. Благодаря раскопкам Института археологии РАН в Коломенском, московских монастырях, Историческом проезде, на Романовом дворе и в других местах опубликованы надежно датированные и представительные комплексы XII–XIII и XVI–XVII вв. (Баталов, Беляев, 2010; Беляев, Смирнов, Шуляев, 2010; Московская керамика… 1991; Кренке, 2009; Глазунова, 2008). Но объекты XIV – начала XV вв. изучены пока гораздо хуже (результаты охранных раскопок городских археологических служб и частных коммерческих организаций на протяжении 1990–2010-х годов мало информативны). Надежно датированные закрытые комплексы с изученными на современном уровне керамическими материалами Москвы фактически отсутствуют. Это заставляет с большой осторожностью подходить к датировке керамических комплексов конца XIV – начала XV вв. Их выделению много внимания уделил С.З. Чернов, но отсутствие построек этого времени в Москве заставило опираться на материалы селищ Северо-Восточного Подмосковья, где керамика имела существенные микрорегиональные отличия от московской. Им отмечено, однако, появление “красноглиняной грубой” керамики в исследованном регионе уже в последние два десятилетия XIV в. (Чернов, 1991. С. 29). Учитывая, что часть материалов из сооружения 32 может рассматриваться в качестве разновидности именно этого типа московской посуды, их датировка по керамике может быть несколько удревнена.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 944

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arkheologiya Moskovskogo Kremlya. Raskopki 2016–2017 gg. [Archaeology of the Moscow Kremlin. Excavations of 2016-2017]. N.A. Makarov, V.Yu. Koval', eds. Moscow: IA RAN, 2018. 164 p.

2. Batalov A.L., Belyaev L.A., 2010. Sacral space of the medieval Moscow Sakral'noe prostranstvo srednevekovoy Moskvy [Sacral space of the medieval Moscow]. Moscow: Dizayn. Informatsiya. Kartografiya. 400 p.

3. Belyaev L.A., Smirnov S.A., Shulyaev S.G., 2010. Recent archaeological finds in the St. Daniel Monastery: acquisition of the remains of archbishop Nikifor Theotoki. Danilovskiy blagovestnik [Danilov Monastery Evangelist], 19, pp. 22–37. (In Russ.)

4. Biblioteka literatury Drevney Rusi [Corpus of the Rus literature], vol. 6. XIV – seredina XV veka [The 14th – middle of the 15th century]. D.S. Likhachev, ed. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1999. 583 p.

5. Blokhin V.G., Yavorskaya L.V., 2006. Arkheologiya zolotoordynskikh gorodov Nizhnego Povolzh'ya [Archaeology of the Golden Horde towns of the Lower Volga region]. Volgograd: Volgogradskiy universitet. 268 p.

6. Bocherens H., Mashkour M., Drucker D.G., Moussa I., Billiou D., 2006. Stable isotope evidence for palaeodiets in southern Turkmenistan during Historical period and Iron Age. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 33, iss. 2, pp. 253–264.

7. Boivin N., Fuller D.Q., Crowther A., 2012. Old World globalization and the Columbian exchange: comparison and contrast. World Archaeology, vol. 44, iss. 3, pp. 452–469.

8. Bronk Ramsey C., 2017. Methods for Summarizing Radiocarbon Datasets. Radiocarbon, 59, pp. 1809–1833.

9. Buzhilova A.P., Mednikova M.B., Engovatova A.V., Koval' V.Yu., 2019. Anthropological finds from the medieval layers of the Taynitsky Garden (based on the materials of the excavations in the Moscow Kremlin in 2007). Rossiyskaya arkheologiya [Russian archaeology], 3, pp. 171–191. (In Russ.)

10. Cherkinsky A., di Lernia S., 2013. Bayesian Approach to 14C Dates for Estimation of Long-Term Archaeological Sequences in Arid Environments: The Holocene Site of Takarkori Rockshelter, Southwest Libya. Radiocarbon, vol. 55, iss. 2, pp. 771–782.

11. Cherkinsky A., Gonzalez Quezada R.F., 2014. Radiocarbon Chronology of the Tlatoani Site at Tlayacapan, Morelos, Mexico. Radiocarbon, vol 56, iss. 2, pp. 501–510.

12. Chernov S.Z., 1991. On the chronology of Moscow pottery of the 13th –middle of the 15th century. Moskovskaya keramika: Novye dannye po khronologii [Moscow pottery: new data on the chronology]. S.Z. Chernov, M.D. Poluboyarinova, eds. Moscow: IA RAN, pp. 20–34. (Materialy i issledovaniya po arkheologii Moskvy, 5). (In Russ.)

13. DeNiro M.J., 1985. Postmortem preservation and alteration of in vivo bone collagen isotope ratios in relation to palaeodietary reconstruction. Nature, vol. 317, iss. 6040, pp. 806–809.

14. DeNiro M.J., 1987. Stable isotopy and archaeology. American Scientist, 75, pp. 182–191.

15. Dubrovin G.E., Koval' V.Yu., 2014. Estate structures of excavation site 1 in the Taynitsky Garden of the Moscow Kremlin (preliminary publication). Arkheologiya Podmoskov'ya: materialy nauchnogo seminara [Archaeology of Moscow vicinity: Proceedings of the academic seminar], 10. A.V. Engovatova, ed. Moscow: IA RAN, pp. 94–110. (In Russ.)

16. Engovatova A.V., Dobrovol'skaya M.V., Zaytseva G.I., 2015. The “Kremlin Diet” of Medieval Russian town (based on isotope data). Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology], 237, pp. 80–89. (In Russ.)

17. Engovatova A.V., Dobrovol'skaya M.V., Zaytseva G.I., Antipina E.E., Kleshchenko E.A., Mednikova M.B., Tarasova A.A., Yavorskaya L.V., 2015. Science methods in the reconstruction of diet patterns and social stratification of medieval European town. Estestvennonauchnye metody issledovaniya i paradigma sovremennoy arkheologii [Science research methods and the paradigm of modern archaeology]. M.V. Dobrovol'skaya, E.N. Chernykh, eds. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury, pp. 117–126. (In Russ.)

18. Engovatova A.V., Osipov D.O., Faradzheva N.N., Buzhilova A.P., Goncharova N.N., 2009. Medieval mass graves in Yaroslavl: analysis of archaeological and anthropological materials. Rossiyskaya arkheologiya [Russian archaeology], 2, pp. 68–78. (In Russ.)

19. Fedorov-Davydov G.A., 1994. Zolotoordynskie goroda Povolzh'ya [The Golden Horde towns of the Volga River region]. Moscow: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. 232 p.

20. Fulminante F., 2015. Infant feeding practices in Europe and the Mediterranian from Prehistory to the Middle Ages: A Comparison between the historical Sources and Bioarchaeology. Childhood in the Past: an International Journal, vol. 8, iss. 1, pp. 24–47.

21. Gaydukov P.G., Oleynikov O.M., 2018. On the activities of the Institute of Archaeology RAS in Veliky Novgorod over the past decade. Vsemirnoe nasledie YuNESKO: Puti i perspektivy razvitiya tsennostnogo potentsiala pamyatnikov Severo-Zapada Rossii: materialy nauchnoy konferentsii [UNESCO world heritage: Paths and prospects of developing axiological potential of the Russian Northwest sites: Proceedings of the scientific conference]. T.M. Voronina, T.N. Yarysh, comp. Velikiy Novgorod: Novgorodskiy muzey-zapovednik; St. Petersburg: Lyubavich, p. 27. (In Russ.)

22. Gippius A.A., Zaliznyak A.A., Koval' V.Yu., 2011. A birchbark letter from excavations in the Moscow Kremlin. Moskovskiy Kreml' XV stoletiya [The Moscow Kremlin of the 15th century], vol. 1. Drevnie svyatyni i istoricheskie pamyatniki [Ancient relics and historical sites]. Moscow: Art-Volkhonka, pp. 452–455. (In Russ.)

23. Glazunova O.N., 2008. Ceramics assemblages from dwelling quarters of the second half of the 15th - beginning of the 16th cc in the Nunnery of the Conception (Moscow). Rossiyskaya arkheologiya [Russian archaeology], 2, pp. 128–141. (In Russ.)

24. Hoppe K.A., Koch P.L., Carlson R.W., 1999. Tracking mammoths and mastodons: Reconstruction of migratory behavior using strontium isotope ratios. Geology, vol. 27, iss. 5, pp. 439–444.

25. Jorkov M.L., Heinemeier J., Lynnerup N., 2007. Evaluating bone collagen extraction methods for stable isotope analysis in dietary studies. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 34, iss. 11, pp. 1824–1829.

26. Khokhlov A.N., 2013. Topography of the city of Tver in the 15th–18th cc.: possibilities of archaeological sources. Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology], 228, pp. 143–152. (In Russ.)

27. Koch P.L., Heisinger J., Moss C., Carlson R.W., Fogel M.L., Behrensmeyer A.K., 1995. Isotopic Tracking of Change in Diet and Habitat Use in African Elephants. Science, vol. 267, no. 5202, pp. 1340–1343.

28. Koroleva E.V., Derkach V.A., Podgornaya R.G. Romanovskiy A.B., 2013. Archaeological studies of Pskov. Diary of excavations and the electronic archive (1912–2008). Arkheologiya i istoriya Pskova i Pskovskoy zemli. Seminar imeni akademika V.V. Sedova: Materialy 58-go zasedaniya [Archaeology and history of Pskov and the Pskov land. Symposium to the academician V.V. Sedov: Proceedings of the 58th session]. Moscow; Pskov: IA RAN, pp. 165–173. (In Russ.)

29. Koval' V.Yu., 2003. Glazed ceramics from the vicinity of Uvek. Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology], 215, pp. 58–69. (In Russ.)

30. Koval' V.Yu., 2016. Pottery from the excavations in the Moscow Kremlin Podol (lower part). Arkheologiya Podmoskov'ya: materialy nauchnogo seminara [Archaeology of Moscow vicinity: Proceedings of the scientific symposium], 12. A.V. Engovatova, ed. Moscow: IA RAN, pp. 437–475. (In Russ.)

31. Koval' V.Yu., Panova T.D., Krenke N.A., Dubrovin G.E., Aleshinskaya A.S., Karpukhin A.A., 2017. Podol (lower part) of the Moscow Kremlin based on archaeological materials. Vestnik Rossiyskogo fonda fundamental'nykh issledovaniy. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki [Russian Foundation for Basic Research Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences], 4 (89), pp. 35–47. (In Russ.)

32. Krenke N.A., 2009. Arkheologiya Romanova dvora. Predystoriya i istoriya tsentra Moskvy [Archaeology of the Romanov yard. Prehistory and history of Moscow centre]. Moscow: IA RAN. 524 p. (Materialy okhrannykh arkheologicheskikh issledovaniy, 12).

33. Lebedeva E.Yu., Kubankin D.A., 2014. Unique finds of rare plants in the Golden Horde city of Ukek. Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology], 236, pp. 339–344. (In Russ.)

34. Lewis M., 2007. The Bioarchaeology of Children: Perspectives from Biologicaland Forensic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 465 p.

35. Malygin P.D., 1989. The cultural layer of medieval Torzhok. Kratkie soobshcheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology], 195, pp. 42–51. (In Russ.)

36. Malygin P.D., Sarafanova N.A., 2007. New sphragistic finds in Torzhok. Vestnik Rossiyskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda [Russian Foundation for Humanities Bulletin], 4 (49), pp. 205–216. (In Russ.)

37. Mednikova M.B., 2017. Bioarkheologiya detstva v kontekste rannezemledel'cheskikh kul'tur Balkan, Kavkaza i Blizhnego Vostoka [Child bioarchaeology in the context of the early farming cultures of the Balkans, the Caucasus and the Middle East]. Moscow: Club Print. 223 p.

38. Mednikova M.B., Rasskazova A.V., Tarasova A.A., 2018. Complex analysis of men’s remains buried in the tomb under slab 1. V poiskakh boyar Romanovykh: mezhdistsiplinarnoe issledovanie usypal'nitsy XVI–XVIII vv. v Znamenskoy tserkvi Novospasskogo monastyrya v Moskve [In search for the Romanov Boyar family: interdisciplinary research of the 16th–18th cc tomb in the Church of the Holy Sign-painter of the Moscow New Savior Monastery], 1. N.A. Makarov, ed. Moscow: Club Print. C. 86–98. (In Russ.)

39. Moskovskaya keramika: Novye dannye po khronologii [Moscow pottery: new data on chronology]. S.Z. Chernov, M.D. Poluboyarinova, eds. Moscow: IA RAN, 1991. 198 p. (Materialy i issledovaniya po arkheologii Moskvy, 5).

40. Novgorodskaya pervaya letopis' starshego i mladshego izvodov [The earlier and the later versions of the Novgorod First Chronicle]. Moscow; Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, 1950. 642 p.

41. Orfinskaya O.V., 2016. Research 15th century-textile from the excavations of 2007. Muzei Moskovskogo Kremlya. Materialy i issledovaniya [The Moscow Kremlin museums: Materials and studies], 27. Moscow: Gosudarstvennyy istoriko-kul'turnyy muzey-zapovednik «Moskovskiy Kreml'», pp. 268–281. (In Russ.)

42. Panova T.D., Koval' V.Yu. Otchet ob okhrannykh arkheologicheskikh raskopkakh na territorii Taynitskogo sada v Moskovskom Kremle v 2007 godu [Report on the 2007 salvage archaeological excavations on the territory of the Taynitsky Garden in the Moscow Kremlin]. Arkhiv Instituta arkheologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Archive of the Institute of Archaeology RAS], R-1, F-1, ¹ 29009.

43. Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopisey [Complete collection of the Russian chronicles], 8. Letopis' po Voskresenskomu spisku [Resurrection Chronicle], 2. St. Petersburg: Tipografiya Eduarda Pratsa, 1859. 301 p.

44. Reimer P.J., Bard E., Bayliss A., Beck J.W., Blackwell P.G., Bronk Ramsey C., Buck C.E., Edwards R.L., Friedrich M., Grootes P.M., Guilderson T.P., Haflidason H., Hajdas I., Hatte C., Heaton T.J., Hogg A.G., Hughen K.A., Kaiser K.F., Kromer B., Manning S.W., Reimer R.W., Richards D.A., Scott E.M., Southon J.R., Turney C.S.M., van der Plicht J., 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP. Radiocarbon, vol 55, iss. 4, pp. 1869–1887.

45. Sarafanova N.A., 2004. Results of the 1999–2002 research of the Torzhok archaeological expedition. Novotorzhskiy sbornik [The new Torzhok collection of papers], 1. Istoriya, arkheologiya, istoricheskaya geografiya [History, archaeology, historical geography]. Torzhok: Izdatel'stvo Vserossiyskogo istoriko-etnograficheskogo muzeya, pp. 14–32. (In Russ.)

46. Shishlina N., van der Plicht J., Turetsky M.A., 2017. The Lebyazhinka Burial Ground (Middle Volga Region, Russia): New 14C dates and Reservoir Effect. Radiocarbon, vol. 60, iss. 2, pp. 681–690.

47. Shishlina N.I., Zazovskaya E.P., van der Plicht J., Hedges R.E.M., Sevastyanov V.S., Chichagova O.A., 2009. Paleoecology, subsistence, and 14C chronology of the Eurasian Caspian steppe Bronze Age. Radiocarbon, vol. 51, iss. 2, pp. 481–499.

48. Tarabardina O.A., 2018. On the salvage archaeological research of the Novgorod Veliky State Museum-Reserve Archaeological Centre in 1992–2017: to the 25th anniversary of the Centre. Vsemirnoe nasledie YuNESKO: Puti i perspektivy razvitiya tsennostnogo potentsiala pamyatnikov Severo-Zapada Rossii: materialy nauchnoy konferentsii [UNESCO world heritage: Paths and prospects of developing axiological potential of the Russian Northwest sites: Proceedings of the scientific conference]. T.M. Voronina, T.N. Yarysh, eds. Velikiy Novgorod: Novgorodskiy muzey-zapovednik; St. Petersburg: Lyubavich, p. 22. (In Russ.)

49. Taylor R.E., Bar-Yosef O., 2014. Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective. 2nd edition. London; New York: Routledge. 403 p.

50. Thompson A.H., Richards M.P., Shortland A., Zakrzewski S.R., 2005. Isotopic palaeodiet studies of ancient Egyptian fauna and humans. Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 32, iss. 3, pp. 451–462.

51. Tykot R.H., 2006. Isotope analyses and the histories of maize. History of Maize. Amsterdam: Academic Press, pp. 131–142.

52. Van der Plikht Y., Shishlina N.I., Zazovskaya E.P., 2016. Radiouglerodnoe datirovanie: khronologiya arkheologicheskikh kul'tur i rezervuarnyy effekt [Radiocarbon dating: chronology of archaeological cultures and the reservoir effect]. Moscow: Paleograf. 101 p. (Trudy Gosudarstvennogo istoricheskogo muzeya, 203).

53. Van Strydonck M., Ervynck À., Vandenbruaene Ì., Boudain M., 2009. Anthropology and 14C analysis of skeletal remains from relic shrines: An unexpected source of information for Medieval archaeology. Radiocarbon, vol. 51, iss. 2, pp. 569–577.

54. Vysotskiy A.L. Otchet. Okhrannye arkheologicheskie raboty Podmoskovnoy arkheologicheskoy ekspeditsii na territorii Svyato-Troitskoy Sergievoy Lavry v 2008 godu [Report. Salvage archaeological works of the Moscow Region archaeological expedition on the territory of the St. Sergius Trinity Lavra in 2008]. Arkhiv Instituta arkheologii Rossiyskoy akademii nauk [Archive of the Institute of Archaeology RAS], R-1, ¹ 37323.

55. Zabelin I.E., 1905. Istoriya goroda Moskvy [History of Moscow], 1. Moscow: Tipolitografiya Tovarishchestva I.N. Kushnerev. 652 p.

56. Zeleneev Yu.A., Kurochkina S.A., 2009. Zolotoordynskiy gorod Saray al-Dzhedid [The Golden Horde town of Sarai al-Jedid]. Yoshkar-Ola: Mariyskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. 264 p.

(https://figshare.com/s/6bc06e09111299582cca) [Download]

(Список_таблиц.docx, 13 Kb) [Download]

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up