Psycho-acmeological deviances of socially important professions with deontological status

Maysak, N.; Ilyin, V.

doi:10.31857/S020595920002250-1

Home

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Issue 1

Psycho-acmeological deviances of socially important professions with deontological status

Annotation
Reviews
References

Psycho-acmeological deviances of socially important professions with deontological status

PII

S020595920002250-1-1

DOI

10.31857/S020595920002250-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

N. Maysak

Occupation: Assistant professor of conflictology and organizational psycholog
Affiliation: Astrakhan State University
Address: Russian Federation

V. Ilyin

Occupation: Professor of chair of Social and General Psychology
Affiliation: Russian State Social University
Address: Russian Federation

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 40 Issue 1

Pages

59-70

Abstract

The term “Psycho-acmeological deviances” is introduced in the article on the basic concept of “acmeologic’s norm development”. The article presents the results of the comparative empirical research, which shows the way to identify personal deviance tendencies of specialists in socially important professions like socionomic (teachers, doctors) and nonsocionomic (engineers). It is emphasized that psycho-acmeological deviances of specialists don’t correspond to deontological status of doctor and teachers’ professions. The study has revealed dynamic characteristics and the most stable underlying trends of tested personalities, defined the criteria and determinants of psycho-acmeological deviances in the profession of doctor and teacher. It can serve as a basis for building preventive practices. The article concludes that the focus of professional self-development and self-improvement contributes disclosing identity, competitiveness and compliance of personality, whose behavior and communication activities correspond to professional and ethical, psychological and acmeological norms.

Keywords

socially important professions, deontological status, psycho-acmeological norm, psycho-acmeological deviances, compliance of specialist

Received

25.02.2019

Publication date

26.02.2019

Number of characters

38231

Cite

GOST	Maysak N., Ilyin V. Psycho-acmeological deviances of socially important professions with deontological status // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2019. – V. 40. – Issue 1 C. 59-70 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920002250-1-1 (circulation date: 24.09.2023). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920002250-1
MLA	Maysak, N., Ilyin, V. "Psycho-acmeological deviances of socially important professions with deontological status." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 40.1 (2019):59-70. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920002250-1
APA	Maysak N., Ilyin V. (2019). Psycho-acmeological deviances of socially important professions with deontological status. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 40(1), pp.59-70 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920002250-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1476

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Akmeologicheskie osnovy professional’nogo samosoznanija lichnosti: Uchebnoe posobie / Sost.: A. A. Dergach, O. V. Moskalenko, V. A. Pjatin, E. V. Selezneva. Astrahan’: AGPU, 2000. 330 p. (In Russian)

2. Bogdanov E. N. Akmeologicheskaja teorija professionalizma v upravlenii: perspektivy sozdanija // Prikladnaja juridicheskaja psihologija. 2010. № 3. P. 8–17. (In Russian)

3. Vodop’janova N. E. Resursnoe obespechenie protivodejstvija professional’nomu vygoraniju sub’ektov truda (na primere specialistov “sub’ekt-sub’ektnyh” professij): Avtoref. diss. … dokt. psihol. nauk. St. Petersburg, 2014. (In Russian)

4. Derkach A.A., Sajko Je. V. Samost’ bazovyj konstrukt stanovlenija i razvertyvanija processa samorealizacii kak soderzhanija akmeologicheskogo razvitija // Mir psihologii. 2008. № 4. P. 225–238. (In Russian)

5. Derkach A.A., Sajko Je. V. Sub’ektnost’ sub’ekta v akmeologicheskom razvitii i problemy ego sub’ektnogo samoosushhestvlenija // Mir psihologii. 2008. № 3. P. 205–219. (In Russian)

6. Ermolaeva E. P. Psihologija professional’nogo marginala v social’no znachimyh vidah truda (stat’ja vtoraja) // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2001. № 5. P. 69–78. (In Russian)

7. Zmanovskaja E.V., Rybnikov V.Ju. Deviantnoe povedenie lichnosti i gruppy: Uchebnoe posobie. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2010. S. 280–289. (In Russian)

8. Il’in V.A., Mihajlova E. A. Krizis identichnosti kak resurs modernizacii obshhestva: issledovanie vosprijatija social’nyh institutov rossijskogo obshhestva predstaviteljami treh social’no-vozrastnyh kategorij sovremennyh rossijan // Social’naja psihologija i obshhestvo. 2012. № 2. P. 41–61. (In Russian)

9. Majsak N.V. “Deviantnyj” vs “deviativnyj”: k obosnovaniju ispol’zovanija terminologii // Terminy v kommunikativnom prostranstve: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Sovremennye problemy jekologii jazyka” (10 fevralja 2017) / Ed. S. I. Madzhaeva. Astrahan’: Izdatel’stvo Astrahanskogo gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta, 2017. P. 241–247. (In Russian)

10. Majsak N. V. Norma i deviacii v socionomicheskih professijah: problemy i puti reshenija // Vestnik Vjatskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta. 2013. № 2 (3). P. 132–138. (In Russian)

11. Majsak N.V., Shnejder L. B. Problema normy v professijah s deontologicheskim statusom // Mir psihologii. 2016. № 4. P. 279–291. (In Russian)

12. Majsak N.V., Jakovec D. A. Social’naja frustracija kak uslovie dezadaptacii i prediktor deviantnosti specialista // Fundamental’nye issledovanija. Jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2013. № 10 (chast’ 8). P. 1830–1837; URL: // http://www.rae.ru/fs/pdf/2013/10–8/32673.pdf (data obrashhenija: 05.03.2018). (In Russian)

13. Mendelevich V. D. Psihologija deviantnogo povedenija: Uchebnoe posobie. Moscow: MEDpress, 2001. P. 393–397. (In Russian)

14. Mudrik A. V. Chelovek – ob’ekt, sub’ekt i zhertva socializacii // Izvestija Rossijskoj akademii obrazovanija. 2008. № 1(8). S. 48–57. (In Russian)

15. Petrenko V. F. Osnovy psihosemantiki. 2 izd., dop. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2005. 480 p. (In Russian)

16. Romanova E.S. 99 populjarnyh professij. Psihologicheskij analiz i professiogrammy. 2-e izd. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2003. 464 p. (In Russian)

17. Tarabrina N. V. Oprosnik vyrazhennosti psihopatologicheskoj simptomatiki // Praktikum po psihologii posttravmaticheskogo stressa. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2001. P. 147–163. (In Russian)

18. Tjurin P. T. Povedencheskie al’ternativy v uslovijah normativnyh i situativnyh trebovanij (PAUNST). Moscow: MPSI, 2010. 264 p. (In Russian)

19. Hitrova N. G. Risunochnyj test “Delovye situacii” / N. G. Hitrova // Luchshie psihologicheskie testy dlja profotbora i proforientacii: opisanie i rukovodstvo k ispol’zovaniju. St. Petersburg: Psiheja, 1992. P. 139–159. (In Russian)

20. Shnejder L. B. Professional’nye innovacii kak istochnik stressa na rabote // Professional’nyj i organizacionnyj stress: diagnostika, profilaktika i korrekcija: materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem (g. Astrahan’, 7–8 oktjabrja 2011 g.) / Eds. B. V. Kajgorodov i N. V. Majsak. Astrahan’: Izdatel’skij dom “Astrahanskij universitet”, 2011. P. 45–50. (In Russian)

21. Muafi P. Causes and Consequence Deviant Workplace Behavior // International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology. April 2011. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 123–126.

22. Siegrist J. Adverse Health Effects of High-Effort / Low-Reward Conditions // Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 1996. Vol. 1. № 1. Р. 27–41.