All
 
|
 
 


To the Problem of the Evolution of the Conceptual Apparatus of Psychology: from the Past to the Future
 
PIIS020595920026161-3-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920026161-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Natalia Grishina 
Occupation: Professor of Personality Psychology Department
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg
S. Kostromina
Occupation: Head of Personality Psychology Department
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 44 Issue 3
Pages99-105
Abstract

In the context of changes in modern reality, leading to the emergence of a new phenomenology and new concepts included in the scientific discourse of psychology, there is a need for methodological reflection, clarification of the subject field, conceptual and categorical apparatus of psychological science. The subject of the article is a discussion of the works of A.L. Zhuravleva and E.A. Sergienko devoted to the analysis of the conceptual apparatus of psychological science. Based on the fact that at the present stage of development of psychological knowledge, the previous coordinates of considering psychological concepts are not enough, and referring to the principles of constructing a system of psychological concepts, formulated by the classics of Russian psychology, the authors propose a system-network principle for describing the conceptual apparatus. The scale of the tasks set by the authors does not imply simple and unambiguous solutions. The logic of the modern methodological analysis of psychological concepts should be associated with the understanding of the modern world as indefinite, changeable, incomplete, redundant and diverse. Based on the discussion of the methodological proposals of A.L. Zhuravleva and E.A. Sergienko, the article formulates the actual tasks of their development — the creation of universal criteria for the systematization of psychological concepts and a universal algorithm for their description, which will make it possible to introduce rigor into the formation of the conceptual apparatus due to a more correct determination of the status of new concepts introduced into scientific discourse, as well as the use of related concepts sciences, etc. The solution of these and other tasks to clarify the conceptual apparatus and categorical structure of modern psychology can become a significant contribution to domestic psychological science.

Keywordsconceptual apparatus of psychology, methodological analysis, systematization of psychological concepts, system-network principle
Publication date28.06.2023
Number of characters19758
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 200

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Anczy`ferova L.I. Materialisticheskaya dialektika i psihologicheskaya nauka (Vmesto predisloviya). Kategorii materialisticheskoj̆ dialektiki v psihologii. Ed. L.I. Anczy`ferova. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. Р. 3–21. (In Russian)
2. Grishina N.V., Kostromina S.N. Psihologiya lichnosti: pereosmyslenie tradicionnyh podhodov v kontekste vyzovov sovremennosti. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. V. 10. № 52. Р. 1. (In Russian)
3. Grishina N.V., Kostromina S.N. Processual'nyj podhod: ustojchivost' i izmenchivost' kak osnovanie celostnosti lichnosti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021. V. 42. № 3. Р. 39–51. (In Russian)
4. Gusel`ceva M.S. Metamodernizm v psihologii: novye metodologicheskie strategii i izmeneniya sub"ektivnosti. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologiya. 2018. V. 8. № 4. Р. 327–340. (In Russian)
5. Zelenkova T.V. Integrativnye tendencii v razvitii psihologii: ot monologa k polilogu // Psihologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. Р. 332–367. (In Russian)
6. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Analiz sovremennyh ponyatij v psihologii. CHast' I. Opyt sistematizacii ponyatij. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021a. V. 42. № 3. Р. 5–15. (In Russian)
7. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Analiz sovremennyh ponyatij v psihologii. CHast' II. Razrabotka sovremennyh ponyatij uchenymi Instituta psihologii RAN. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2021b. V. 42. № 4. Р. 5–15. (In Russian)
8. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Sistemno-setevaya organizaciya sovremennyh ponyatij psihologii (na primere razrabotok sotrudnikov Instituta psihologii RAN). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2022. V. 43. № 3. Р. 5–14. (In Russian)
9. Kostromina S.N. Klassicheskij “paradoks lichnosti”: est' metodologicheskie osnovaniya dlya resheniya? Novye psihologicheskie issledovaniya. 2021. № 2. P. 7–30. (In Russian)
10. Ponomarev YA.A. Metodologicheskoe vvedenie v psihologiyu. Moscow: Nauka. 1983. (In Russian)
11. Marcinkovskaya T.D. Problema socializacii v istoriko-geneticheskoj̆ paradigme. Moscow: Smysl, 2015. (In Russian)
12. Razrabotka ponyatij sovremennoj psihologii. V 3-h t. Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018–2021. (In Russian)
13. Sergienko E.A. Ot differenciacii k integracii podhodov i kategorij v sovremennom psihologicheskom znanii. Psihologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. Р. 308–331. (In Russian)
14. Valsiner J. From Methodology to Methods in Human Psychology. Springer, 2017.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up