Social Competence in Adolescents with Different Level of Theory of Mind

 
PIIS020595920024342-2-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920024342-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Senior researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Moscow, st. Yaroslavskaya, 13
Occupation: Senior researcher of the laboratory of psychology of development of the subject in normal and post-traumatic States
Affiliation: FGBUN Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Russian Federation
Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 44 Issue 1
Pages43-54
Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the role of theory of mind - the ability to attribute mental states to other people to explain their behavior - in the development of social competence and prosocial behavior in adolescence. It is assumed that there is a difference in the manifestation of prosocial behavior and social competence in adolescents with different levels of theory of mind. Participants were 95 adolescents aged 12–15 years (M=13.8; SD=9.5; 46 girls). We used “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test to assess the social-perceptual component of theory of mind (assessment of the recognition of mental states by facial expressions) and the task of understanding higher-order false beliefs to assess the socio-cognitive component. We assessed the adolescent’s prosocial behavior during a group game of puzzles and calculated the ratio of the number of prosocial acts to time in seconds. Teachers assessed the social behavior of adolescents using a specially designed questionnaire. We also used a sociometric method to study the popularity of adolescents in the group. The results obtained testify to the different contribution of the socio-perceptual and socio-cognitive components of theory of mind to the development of social competence of adolescents. Adolescents who better understand the mental states of others and predict their behavior are more likely to act prosocially, are more persuasive and successful in mastering the school curriculum. Teachers are rated those who better recognize mental states by facial expressions as more helpful and popular among their peers. Adolescents with low level of theory of mind are rejected by their peers.

Keywordstheory of mind, social cognition, prosocial behavior, social competence, popularity among peers
AcknowledgmentThe study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 22-28-00474.
Publication date26.02.2023
Number of characters33172
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 324

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Burkova V.N., Butovskaya M.L., Dronova D.A., Adam YU.I. Al'truizm i parohializm u detej i podrostkov: gendernye i vozrastnye razlichiya. Eksperimental'naya psihologiya. 2021. V. 14. № 3. P. 50–66. (in Russian)

2. Gartvik E.V. Sootnoshenie modeli psihicheskogo i delinkventnogo povedeniya u podrostkov. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psihologiya. Sociokinetika. 2020. V. 26. № 3. P. 73–78. (in Russian)

3. Lebedeva E.I. Model' psihicheskogo i social'no-emocional'naya kompetentnost' detej mladshego shkol'nogo vozrasta (po ocenkam roditelej i pedagogov). Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sociologiya. 2022. № 2. P. 277–286. (in Russian)

4. Ulanova A.Yu. Social'no-emocional'naya kompetentnost' starshih podrostkov: sravnenie samootcheta i vneshnej ocenki. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Sociologiya. 2022. № 2. P. 287–295. (in Russian)

5. Apperly I.A., Butterfill S.A. Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? Psychological review. 2009. V. 116. № 4. P. 953–970.

6. Białecka-Pikul M., Kołodziejczyk A., Bosacki S. Advanced theory of mind in adolescence: Do age, gender and friendship style play a role? Journal of Adolescence. 2017. V. 56. P. 145–156.

7. Białecka‐Pikul M., et al. Theory of mind and peer attachment in adolescence Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2021. V. 31. № 4. P. 1202–1217.

8. Baron-Cohen S., et al. Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? A test with children with Asperger Syndrome. Journal of developmental and learning disorders. 2001. V. 5. № 1. P. 47–78.

9. Bosacki S. Theory of mind and peer relationships in middle childhood and adolescence. Theory of Mind in Middle Childhood and Adolescence. Routledge, 2021. P. 142–168.

10. Caputi M., Lecce S., Pagnin A., Banerjee R. Longitudinal effects of theory of mind on later peer relations: the role of prosocial behavior. Developmental psychology. 2012. V. 48. № 1. P. 257–270.

11. Caputi M., Cugnata F., Brombin C. Theory of mind and loneliness: Effects of a conversation‐based training at school. International Journal of Psychology. 2021. V. 56. № 2. P. 257–265.

12. Devine R.T., White N., Ensor R., Hughes C. Theory of mind in middle childhood: Longitudinal associations with executive function and social competence. Developmental Psychology. 2016. V. 52. № 5. P. 758–771.

13. Gerbino M., et al. Adolescents' prosocial behavior predicts good grades beyond intelligence and personality traits. Journal of personality. 2018. V. 86. № 2. P. 247–260.

14. Hughes C. Theory of mind grows up: Reflections on new research on theory of mind in middle childhood and adolescence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2016. V. 149. P. 1–5.

15. Hughes C., Devine R.T. Individual differences in theory of mind from preschool to adolescence: Achievements and directions. Child Development Perspectives. 2015. V. 9. P. 149–153.

16. Hyde D.C., Simon C.E., Ting F., Nikolaeva J.I. Functional organization of the temporal–parietal junction for theory of mind in preverbal infants: a near-infrared spectroscopy study. Journal of Neuroscience. 2018. V. 38. № 18. P. 4264–4274.

17. Imuta K., et al. Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood: A meta-analytic review. Developmental psychology. 2016. V. 52. № 8. P. 1192–1205.

18. Jenkins J.M., Astington J.W. Theory of mind and social behavior: Causal models tested in a longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 2000. V. 46. P. 203–220.

19. Kuhnert R.L., Begeer S., Fink E., de Rosnay M. Gender-differentiated effects of theory of mind, emotion understanding, and social preference on prosocial behavior development: A longitudinal study. Journal of experimental child psychology. 2017. V. 154. P. 13–27.

20. Laursen B., Veenstra R. Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: A summary and synthesis of recent empirical research. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2021. V. 31. № 4. P. 889–907.

21. Lecce S., Bianco F., Hughes C. Reading minds and reading texts: Evidence for independent and specific associations. Cognitive Development. 2021. V. 57. P. 101010.

22. Lecce S., Caputi M., Pagnin A., Banerjee R. Theory of mind and school achievement: The mediating role of social competence. Cognitive Development. 2017. V. 44. P. 85–97.

23. Liddle B., Nettle D. Higher-order theory of mind and social competence in school-age children. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology. 2006. V. 4. № 3–4. С. 231–244.

24. Lockl K., Ebert S., Weinert S. Predicting school achievement from early theory of mind: Differential effects on achievement tests and teacher ratings. Learning and Individual Differences. 2017. V. 53. P. 93–102.

25. Meinhardt‐Injac B., Daum M. M., Meinhardt G. Theory of mind development from adolescence to adulthood: Testing the two‐component model. British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2020. V. 38. № 2. P. 289–303.

26. Miller S.E., Reavis R.E., Avila B.N. Associations between theory of mind, executive function, and friendship quality in middle childhood. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 2018. V. 64. № 3. P. 397–426.

27. Osterhaus C., Koerber S., Sodian B. Scaling of advanced theory‐of‐mind tasks. Child development. 2016. V. 87. № 6. P. 1971–1991.

28. Rubin K.H., Bukowski W.M., Parker J.G. Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups. Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development. Eds. N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, R.M. Lerner. N.Y.: Wiley, 2006. P. 571–645.

29. Slaughter V., Imuta K., Peterson C.C., Henry J.D. Meta‐analysis of theory of mind and peer popularity in the preschool and early school years. Child development. 2015. V. 86. № 4. P. 1159–1174.

30. Smith P. Bullying and theory of mind: A review. Current psychiatry reviews. 2017. V. 13. № 2. P. 90–95.

31. Smith S., et al. Emotional competencies in emerging adolescence: relations between teacher ratings and student self-reports. International Journal of adolescence and Youth. 2019. V. 24. № 1. P. 19–28.

32. Stout W., Karahuta E., Laible D., Brandone A.C. A longitudinal study of the differential social‐cognitive foundations of early prosocial behaviors. Infancy. 2021. V. 26. № 2. P. 271–290.

33. Tager-Flusberg H., Sullivan K. A componential view of theory of mind: evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognition. 2000. V. 76. № 1. P. 59–90.

34. Wagemaker E., van Hoorn J., Bexkens A. Susceptibility to peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescents with Mild Intellectual Disability or Borderline Intellectual Functioning. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2022. V. 120. P. 104143.

35. Weimer A.A., et al. Development of constructivist theory of mind from middle childhood to early adulthood and its relation to social cognition and behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2017. V. 154. P. 28–45.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up