Всего подписок: 0, всего просмотров: 395
Оценка читателей: голосов 0
1. Ильенков Э. Что же такое личность? // С чего начинается личность. М.: Наука, 1984.
2. Afsar B., Umrani W.A. Transformational Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: The Role of Motivation to Learn, Task Complexity and Innovation Climate // European Journal of Innovation Management. 2019. V. 23. № 3. P. 402–428.
3. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: An Agentic Perspective // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2001. V. 52. P. 1–26.
4. Badura K., Grijalva E., Galvin B., Owens B., Joseph D. Motivation to lead: A meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership // Journ. of Applied Psychology. 2020. V.105. № 4. P. 331–354.
5. Barandiaran X.E., Paolo E, Di Rohde M. Defining agency: individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action // Adapt. Behav. 2009. V.17. № 5. P. 367–386.
6. Bartell T., Cho C., Drake C., Petchauer E., Richmond G. Teacher Agency and Resilience in the Age of Neoliberalism // Journ. of Teacher Education. 2019. V. 70. № 4. P. 302–305.
7. Baumeister RF. Free Will in Scientific Psychology // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2008. V. 3. №1. P. 14–19.
8. Baumeister R.F., Tice D.M., Vohs K.D. The strength model of self-regulation: conclusions from the second decade of willpower research // Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2018. V.13. № 2. P. 141–45.
9. Beck B., Di Costa S., Haggard P. Having control over the external world increases the implicit sense of agency // Cognition. 2017. V. 162. P. 54–60.
10. Berhane Y., Worku A., Tewahido D., Fasil N., Gulema H., Tadesse, A. W., & Abdelmenan S. Adolescent girls’ agency significantly correlates with favorable social norms in ethiopia—implications for improving sexual and reproductive health of young adolescents // Journal of Adolescent Health. 2019. V. 64. № 4. P. 52–59.
11. Beyers W., Goossens L., Vansant I., & Moors E. A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency // Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2003. V. 32. № 5. P. 351–365.
12. Berkman E.T., Hutcherson C.A., Livingston J.L., Kahn L.E., Inzlicht M. Self-control as value-based choice // Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2017. V. 26. № 5. P. 422–428.
13. Bryan C. J., Andreski S. R., McNaughton-Cassill M., & Osman A. Agency is associated with decreased emotional distress and suicidal ideation in military personnel // Archives of Suicide Research. 2014. V. 18. № 3. P. 241–250.
14. Carver C.S., Scheier M.F. On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998.
15. Cavazzoni F., Fiorini A. & Veronese G. How Do We Assess How Agentic We Are? A Literature Review of Existing Instruments to Evaluate and Measure Individuals' Agency // Soc.Indic.Res. 2022. V.159. P. 1125–1153.
16. Charles L., Haggard P. Feeling free: External influences on endogenous behaviour // Quartely Journ. of Exp.Ps. 2020. V. 73. № 4, P. 568-577.
17. Cohen J.D. Cognitive control: core constructs and current considerations // Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Control. Ed. T. Egner, pp. 3–28. Malden, MA: Wiley, 2017.
18. Converse B.A., Juarez L, Hennecke M. Self-control and the reasons behind our goals // Journ. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2019. V.116. № 5.
19. Cooper C. L., Lu L. Excessive availability for work: Good or bad? Charting underlying motivations and searching for game-changers // Human Resource Management Review. 2019. V. 29. № 4. Article 100682. doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.01.003.
20. Di Costa S., The ́ro H., Chambon V., Haggard P. Try and try again: post-error boost of an implicit measure of agency // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2017. V. 71. P. 1584–1595.
21. Di Domenico S. I., and Ryan R. M. The emerging neuroscience of intrinsic motivation: a new frontier in self-determination research // Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2017. V. 11. Article145. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00145.
22. Duckworth A.L., Gendler T.S., Gross J.J. Situational strategies for self-control // Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2016. V. 11. № 1. P. 35–55.
23. Emirbayer M., Mische A. What is agency? // American journal of sociology. 1998. V. 103. № 4. P. 962–1023.
24. Frith C.D., Haggard P. Volition and the brain: revisiting a classic experimental study // Trends Neurosci. 2018. V. 41. P. 405–407.
25. Galvin B.M. Changing the focus of locus (of control): A targeted review of the locus of control literature and agenda for future research // Journ. of Organizational Behavior. 2018. V. 39. № 7. P. 820–833.
26. Gillebaart M., de Ridder D.T.D. Effortless self-control: a novel perspective on response conflict strategies in trait self-control // Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass. 2015. V. 9. № 2. P. 88–99.
27. Guinote A. How Power Affects People: Activating, Wanting, and Goal Seeking // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2017. V. 68. P. 353–381.
28. Haggard P. The Neurocognitive Bases of Human Volition // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2019. V. 70. P. 9–28.
29. Heckhausen J. Integrating and instigating research on person and situation, motivation and volition, and their development // Motivation Science. 2020, V. 6. № 3. P. 185–188.
30. Heckhausen J., Wrosch C., Richard Schulz R. Agency and Motivation in Adulthood and Old Age // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2019. V. 70. P. 191–217.
31. Hofmann W., Friese M., Strack F. Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective // Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2009. V. 4. № 2. P. 162–76.
32. Inzlicht M., Werner K.M., Briskin J.L. and Roberts B.W. Integrating Models of Self-Regulation // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2021. V. 72. P. 319–45.
33. Kehr H.M. Motivation and volition at work // Motivation Science 2020. V. 6, № 3, P. 201–202.
34. Koole S. L., Schlinkert C., Maldei T., and Baumann N. Becoming who you are: an integrative review of self-determination theory and personality systems interactions theory // Journ. Pers. 2019. V. 87, P. 15–36.
35. Kruglanski A.W., Shah J.Y., Fishbach A., Friedman R., Chun W.Y., Sleeth-Keppler D. A theory of goal systems // Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2002. V. 34. P. 331–378.
36. Kwon K., Kim T. An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: Revisiting the JD-R model // Human Resource Management Review. 2020. V. 30. № 2. Article 100704.
37. Meyer J.W. World society, institutional theories, and the actor // Annual review of sociology. 2010. V. 36. P. 1–20.
38. Mironenko I. A., Sorokin P.S. Concerning Paradigmatic Status of Psychological Science: For a Flexible and Flowing Psychology in the Face of Practical and Theoretical Challenges // Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. 2020. V. 54. P. 604–612.
39. Mironenko I.A., Sorokin P. S., Activity Theory for the De-Structuralized Modernity // Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09587-4.
40. Murnieks C., Klotz A., Shepherd D. Entrepreneurial Motivation: A Review of the Literature and Agenda for Future Research // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2019. V. 41. № 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.2374.
41. Poteat V. P., Calzo J. P., & Yoshikawa H. Gay-Straight Alliance involvement and youths’ participation in civic engagement, advocacy, and awareness-raising // Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2018. V. 56. P. 13–20.
42. Quirin M., Jais M., Di Domenico S.I., Kuhl J., Ryan R.M. Effortless Willpower? The Integrative Self and Self-Determined Goal Pursuit. // Front. Psychol. 2021. V. 12. Article 653458. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653458.
43. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2018.
44. Rydzik A., Anitha S. Conceptualising the agency of migrant women workers: Resilience, reworking and resistance // Work, Employment and Society. 2019. V. 34. № 5. P. 883–899.
45. Smith K., Ulvik M. Leaving teaching: lack of resilience or sign of agency? // Teachers and Teaching. 2017. V. 23, № 8. P. 928–945.
46. Sorokin P.S. The Promise of John W. Meyer’s World Society Theory: “Otherhood” through the Prism of Pitirim A. Sorokin’s Integralism // The American Sociologist. 2020. V. 51. № 4. P. 506–525.
47. Sorokin P., Froumin I. ‘Utility’ of education and the role of transformative agency: Policy challenges and agendas // Policy Futures in Education. 2021. doi:10.1177/14782103211032080.
48. Steven D., Brown S.D., Lent R.W. Vocational Psychology: Agency, Equity, and Well-Being // Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2016. V. 67. P. 541–565.
49. Sutterlüty F., Tisdall E.K.M. Agency, autonomy and self-determination: Questioning key concepts of childhood studies // Global Studies of Childhood. 2019. V. 9. № 3. P. 183–187.
50. Whiteside S.P., Lynam D.R. The five factor model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity // Personal. Individ. Differ. 2001. V. 30 № 4. P. 669–689.
51. Zimmerman M. A., Eisman A. B., Reischl T. M., Morrel-Samuels S., Stoddard S., Miller A. L., et al. Youth empowerment solutions: Evaluation of an after-school program to engage middle school students incommunity change // Health Education & Behavior. 2018. V. 45. № 1. P. 20–31.