Attachment In Young Children In Different Periods Of Russian Society

 
PIIS020595920021477-0-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920021477-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: professor, head of child and parent mental health and early intervention division at department of psychology
Affiliation: St. Petersburg University
Address: Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Occupation: Graduate student
Affiliation: St. Petersburg University
Address: Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 43 Issue 4
Pages27-35
Abstract

Studies of attachment in different countries indicate negative changes in the distribution of attachment patterns in social risk children, as well as cultural differences in attachment distribution that emphasize the importance of socio-economic conditions in the formation of family life and parenting models. The current study compares the distribution of attachment patterns obtained in three studies of young children conducted in 1989 and 2017–2018, before and after a period of deep socio-economic and political crisis in Russian society, and in 1999 – early 2000s by the end of this period. In each study attachment quality was assessed in the Strange Situation. Results show that the distribution of attachment patterns in young Russian children corresponds to the “standard” distribution in studies of 1989 and 2017-2018, and indicates the significantly lower rates of secure attachment and higher rates of resistant and disorganized attachment in the study of 1999 – early 2000s. These results support the need of the positive socio-economic conditions in society favorably affecting the stability and security of family life and supporting the formation by young children the organized attachment and increase the rate of security.

Keywordsattachment patterns, young children, Russian society, socio-economic conditions
AcknowledgmentThe reported study was funded by Russian Science Foundation, project no. 22-28-00626, https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-28-00626/
Publication date15.09.2022
Number of characters26010
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 266

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Muhamedrahimov R.J., Pleshkova N.L. Metody izucheniya privyazannosti u mladentsev i detei rannego vozrasta. Praktikum po vozrastnoi psikhologii. Eds. L.A. Golovei, E.F. Rybalko. Saint Petersburg: Rech, 2000. P. 598–615. (In Russian)

2. Pleshkova N.L. Razvitie teorii i sistemy klassifikatsii otnoshenii privyazannosti u detei. Emotsii i otnosheniya cheloveka na rannikh etapakh razvitiya. Ed. R.J. Muhamedrahimova. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2008. P. 198–219. (In Russian)

3. Pleshkova N.L., Muhamedrahimov R.J. Otnosheniya privyazannosti u detei v semyakh i domakh rebenka. Emotsii i otnosheniya cheloveka na rannikh etapakh razvitiya. Ed. R.J. Muhamedrahimova. Saint Petersburg: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2008. P. 220–239. (In Russian)

4. Rossiya v tsifrakh. 2019: Kratkii statisticheskii sbornik. Eds. P.V. Malkov et al. Moscow: Federalnaya sluzhba gosudarstvennoi statistiki (Rosstat), 2019. (In Russian)

5. Ahnert L., Meischner T., Schmidt A. Maternal sensitivity and attachment in East German and Russian Family Networks. The organization of attachment relationships: Maturation, culture, and context. Eds. P.M. Crittenden, A.H. Claussen. NY: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 61–74.

6. Ainsworth M.D.S., Blehar M., Waters E., Wall S. Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.

7. Archer M., Steele M., Lan J., Jin X., Herreros F., Steele H. Attachment between infants and mothers in China: Strange situation procedure findings to date and a new simple. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2015. V. 39. № 6. P. 485–491.

8. Bernard K., Dozier M., Bick J., Lewis-Morrarty E., Lindhiem O., Carlson E. Enhancing Attachment Organization Among Maltreated Children: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Child Development. 2012. V. 83. № 2. P. 623–636.

9. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books, 1982 (Original work published 1969).

10. Cassidy J., Berlin L. The insecure/ambivalent pattern of attachment: Theory and research. Child Development. 1994. V. 65. P. 971–991.

11. Crittenden P.M. A dynamic-maturational model of attachment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 2006. V. 27. P. 105–115.

12. Main M., Solomon J. Procedure for identifying infants as disorganized/disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. Attachment in preschool years: Theory, research and intervention. Eds. Greenberg M.T., Cicchetti D., Cummings E.M. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. P. 121–160.

13. Mesman J., van Ijzendoorn M.H., Sagi-Schwartz A. Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed.). Eds. J. Cassidy, P.R. Shaver. NY: Guilford Press, 2016. P. 790–815.

14. Pleshkova N.L., Muhamedrahimov R.J. Quality of attachment in St. Petersburg (Russian Federation): A sample of family-reared infants. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2010. V. 15. № 3. P. 355–362.

15. van Ijzendoorn M.H., Kroonenberg P.M. Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: A meta-analysis of the strange situation. Child development. 1988. V. 59. P. 147–156.

16. van Ijzendoorn M.H., Schuengel C., Bakermans-Kranenburg M.J. Disorganized attachment in early childhood: Meta-analysis of precursors, concomitants, and sequelae. Development and Psychopathology. 1999. V. 11. P. 225–249.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up