Light And Dark Sides Of Reflection And Areflection: Splitting Effect

Occupation: Leading Research Officer of Laboratory of Psychology of Abilities and Mental Resources Named after V.N. Druzhinin
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 43 Issue 4

Pages

15-26

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to analyze the phenomenology of reflection, taking into account the relationship of the level of reflection with various intellectual and personal properties and the success of the activity. Along with this, the objectives of the study are to substantiate the role of metacognitive abilities as the basis of positive and negative manifestations of a high and low level of reflection, allowing us to talk about the light and dark sides of reflection and areflection. The results of the analysis describe the manifestations of the “splitting effects” of high and low reflection indicators. The pole of high reflection can hide both productive forms of self-regulation with positive consequences (such as increasing the success of activities, self-efficacy, systemic reflection), and maladaptive forms of self-regulation with negative consequences (decreased success in activities, rumination, hyperpersonal control, illusory control, introspection, quasi-reflection). In turn, the pole of low reflection also “splits” into two different components: productive forms of self-regulation with positive consequences (implicit learning, intellectual behavior of experts, secondary control, selective meaningfulness, creative process) and maladaptive forms of self-regulation with negative consequences (decreased success, learned helplessness, psychological encapsulation). In addition, the mechanism that provides the effect of splitting high and low indicators of reflection is metacognitive abilities (the ability to involuntarily and voluntarily control one's mental activity). The results of the study allow us to conclude the multidimensional (nonlinear) nature of reflection.

Keywords

reflection, self-regulation, cognitive control, voluntary control, involuntary control, “splitting effect”, metacognitive abilities

Publication date

15.09.2022

Number of characters

32503

Cite

GOST	Kholodnaya M. Light And Dark Sides Of Reflection And Areflection: Splitting Effect // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2022. – V. 43. – Issue 4 C. 15-26 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920021475-8-1 (circulation date: 04.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920021475-8
MLA	Kholodnaya, M. A "Light And Dark Sides Of Reflection And Areflection: Splitting Effect." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 43.4 (2022):15-26. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920021475-8
APA	Kholodnaya M. (2022). Light And Dark Sides Of Reflection And Areflection: Splitting Effect. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 43(4), pp.15-26 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920021475-8

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 266

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avramenko N.N. Rol' refleksivnyh processov v vybore strategij sovladanija s trudnymi zhiznennymi situacijami u studentov. Vestnik Kostromskogo gos. un-ta. Serija: Pedagogika. Psihologija. Sociokinetika. 2016. V. 22. № 3. P. 128–132.

2. Valueva E.A., Ushakov D.V. Insajt i inkubacija v myshlenii: rol' processov osoznavanija. Sibirskij psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2017. № 63. P. 19–35.

3. Vinogradova L.V. Intellektual'nyj kontrol' kak sposob interpretacii jemocional'no-trudnyh zhiznennyh situacij. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2004. V. 25. № 6. P. 21–28.

4. Vygotskij L.S. Myshlenie i rech'. Sobr. soch. V. 2. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982. P. 5–361.

5. Karpov A.A., Karpov A.V. Vzaimosvjaz' psihometricheskogo intellekta s organizaciej metakognitivnyh processov i kachestv lichnosti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2016. V. 37. № 2. P. 69–78.

6. Karpov A.V., Ponomareva V.V. Psihologija refleksivnyh processov upravlenija. Moscow–Jaroslavl: Dia-Press, 2000.

7. Karpov A.V. Psihologija refleksivnyh mehanizmov dejatel'nosti. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2004.

8. Karpov A.V. O ponjatii metakognitivnyh sposobnostej lichnosti. Psihologija intellekta i tvorchestva. Eds. A.L. Zhuravleva, M.A. Holodnaya i dr. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2010. P. 35–46.

9. Karpov A.V. Psihologija soznanija. Metasistemnyj podhod. Moscow: Izd-vo RAO, 2011.

10. Kostenko V.Ju. Refleksivnye predposylki lichnostnoj zrelosti: Dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. Moscow, 2017.

11. Lapteva N.M. Inkubacija v reshenii tvorcheskih zadach: gipotezy i perspektivy issledovanij. Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2020. V. 17. № 4. P. 630–644.

12. Leont'ev D.A., Averina A.Zh. Fenomen refleksii v kontekste problemy samoreguljacii. Psihologicheskie issledovanija: jelektron. nauch. zhurnal. 2011. № 2 (16). URL: http//psystudy.ru/index.php/2011n2-16/463-leontiev-averina16.html (data obrashhenija: 20.10.21).

13. Leont'ev D.A., Osin E.N. Refleksija “horoshaja” i “durnaja”: ot ob#jasnitel'noj modeli k differencial'noj diagnostike. Psihologija: Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2014. V. 11. № 4. P. 110–135.

14. Litvinov A.V., Ivolina T.V. Metakognicija: Ponjatie, struktura, svjaz' s intellektual'nymi i kognitivnymi sposobnostjami (po materialam zarubezhnyh issledovanij). Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija. 2013. № 3. P. 59–70.

15. Moroshkina N.V., Ivanchej I.I. Implicitnoe nauchenie: issledovanie sootnoshenija osoznavaemyh i neosoznavaemyh processov v kognitivnoj psihologii. Metodologija i istorija psihologii. 2012. V. 7. № 4. P. 109–131.

16. Morosanova V.I. Osoznannaja samoreguljacija proizvol'noj aktivnosti cheloveka kak psihologicheskij resurs dostizhenija celej. Teoreticheskaja i jeksperimental'naja psihologija. 2014. V. 7. № 4. P. 62–78.

17. Ozhiganova G.V. Refleksija, refleksivnost' i vysshie refleksivnye sposobnosti: podhody k issledovaniju. Vestnik Kostromskogo gos. un-ta. Serija: Pedagogika. Psihologija. Sociokinetika. 2018. № 4. P. 56–60.

18. Perevalova O.V. Reflektivnye sposobnosti lichnosti kak polinauchnaja kategorija. Vestnik Krasnojarskogo gos. ped. un-ta. 2012. № 2. P. 237–244.

19. Piazhe Zh. Psihologija intellekta. Psihologicheskie trudy. Moscow: Prosveshhenie, 1969.

20. Pugovkina O.D., Shil'nikova Z.I. Koncepcija mindfulness (osoznannost'): nespecificheskij faktor psihologicheskogo blagopoluchija. Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija. 2014. № 2. P. 18–28.

21. Sagalakova O.A., Truevcev D.V. Ruminacii v kontekste metakognicij, neadaptivnyh shem i psihicheskoj rigidnosti. Izvestija Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. № 2/1 (70). P. 69–72.

22. Semenov I.N. Refleksivnaja psihologija tvorchestva: koncepcii, jeksperimentatika, praktika. Psihologija. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly jekonomiki. 2005. V. 2. № 4. P. 65–73.

23. Semenov I.N. Refleksivnost' samonabljudenija i personologija introspekcii: k ontologii i metodologii refleksivnoj psihologii individual'nosti. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 14. Psihologija. 2015. № 3. P. 22–39.

24. Seregin K.S. Svjaz' refleksii i ponjatijnogo myshlenija podrostkov: Dis. … kand. psihol. nauk. M., 2013.

25. Sergienko E.A., Vilenskaja G.A., Kovaleva Ju.V. Kontrol' povedenija kak sub’ektnaja reguljacija. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2010.

26. Sergienko E.A. Psihicheskoe razvitie s pozicij sistemno-sub#ektnogo podhoda. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2021.

27. Solov'eva E.V. Vyrazhennost' parametrov jempatii pri urovnjah avtoritarnoj agressii. Metodologija sovremennoj psihologii. 2021. № 4. P. 123–127.

28. Filinskaja M.A., Lifincev D.V. Vzaimosvjaz' ruminativnogo myshlenija i jemocional'noj dezadaptacii u shkol'nikov starshih klassov (9, 10, 11 klass). Ustojchivoe razvitie nauki i obrazovanija. 2019. № 8. P. 69–77.

29. Kholodnaya M.A. Psihologija intellekta: Paradoksy issledovanija. Moscow–Tomsk: Bars, 1997.

30. Kholodnaya M.A. Psihologija intellekta: Paradoksy issledovanija. 3-e izd., dop. i pererab. Moscow: Urait, 2019.

31. Kholodnaya M.A. Kognitivnye stili: O prirode individual'nogo uma. 2 izd., dop. i pererab. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2004.

32. Kholodnaya M.A. Mnogomernaja priroda pokazatelej intellekta i kreativnosti: teoreticheskie i metodicheskie sledstvija. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2020. V. 41. № 3. P. 18–31.

33. Chemjakina A.V., Perevozkina Ju.M., Karpov A.V., Karpov A.A. Strukturnye zakonomernosti refleksivnoj determinacii upravlencheskoj dejatel'nosti v obrazovatel'nom prostranstve. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2018. V. 8. № 5. P. 209–228.

34. Shadrikov V.D., Kuznecova M.D. Dinamika svjazej pokazatelej intellekta i refleksii v processe obuchenija. Akmeologija. 2013. № 1(45). P. 31–45.

35. Burger J.M. Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989. V. 56. № 2. P. 246–256.

36. Cowley E., Briley D.A., Farrell C. How do gamblers maintain an illusion of control. Journal of Business Research. 2015. V. 68. № 10. P. 2181–2188.

37. Dienes Z., Perner J. A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1999. № 22. P. 735–808.

38. Dienes Z., Scott R. Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research. 2005. № 69. P. 338–351.

39. Flavell J.H. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist. 1979. V. 34. № 10. P .96–101.

40. Hwang J. Relationships among locus of control, learned helplessness, and mathematical literacy in PISA 2012: focus on Korea and Finland. Large-scale Assess Education. 2019. V. 7. № 4.

41. Ingram R.E. Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: Review and a conceptual model. Psychological Bulletin. 1990. V. 107. № 2. P. 156–176.

42. Lam A.G., Zane N.W.S. Ethnic differences in coping with interpersonal stressors: A test of self-construals as cultural mediators. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2004. V. 35. P. 446–459.

43. Langer E.J. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975. V. 32. № 2. P. 311–328.

44. Morling B., Evered S. Secondary control reviewed and defined. Psychological Bulletin. 2006. V. 132. № 2. P. 269–296.

45. Munakata Y., Snyder H.R., Chatham Ch.H. Developing Cognitive Control: Three Key Transitions. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2012. V. 21. № 2. P. 71–77.

46. Nisbett R.E., Aronson J., Blair C., Dickens W., Flynn J., Halpern, D.F., Turkheimer E. Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments. American Psychologist. 2012. V. P. 130–159.

47. Nolen-Hoeksema S., Parker, L.E., Larson J. Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994. V. 67. № 1. P. 92–104.

48. Nolen-Hoeksema S., Wisco B.E, Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking Rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2008. V. 3. № 5. P. 400–424.

49. Rothbaum F., Weisz J.R., Snyder S.S. Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982. V. 42. № 1. P. 5–37.

50. Shapiro D.H., Schwartz C.E., Astin J.A. Controlling ourselves, controlling our world: Psychology’s role in understanding positive and negative consequences of seeking and gaining control. American Psychologist. 1996. V. 51. № 12. P. 1213–1230.

51. Sternberg R.J. The triarchic mind: A new theory of human intelligence. N.Y.: Viking Penguin Inc., 1988.

52. Thurstone L.L. The nature of intelligence. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.; New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company, Inc., 1924.

53. Watt C., Watson S., Wilson L. Cognitive and psychological mediators of anxiety: Evidence from a study of paranormal belief and perceived childhood control. Personality and Individual Difference. 2007. V. 42 (2). P. 335–343.