Perfectionism and Impostor Phenomenon as Predictors of Work Engagement and Subjective Well-Being

 
PIIS020595920020498-3-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920020498-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Perm, Perm, Studencheskaya Street, 38, Russia
Occupation: Senior Lecturer of the School of Psychology, Senior Research Fellow of the International Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation
Affiliation: HSE University
Address: Myasnickaya str., b., 20
Affiliation: Department of Foreign Languages, National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation
Occupation: Professor of the Department of General Psychology
Affiliation: Institute of Social Sciences RANEPA
Address: 119571, Moscow, Vernadsky Avenue, 82, Russia
Occupation: Professor, Department of Foreign Languages
Affiliation: National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Perm, Studencheskaya Street, 38, Russia
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 43 Issue 3
Pages80-88
Abstract

Perfectionism and Imposter Phenomenon are key psychological traits of modern organization’s employees. The purpose of this research is to investigate perfectionism and Impostor Phenomenon as predictors of work engagement and subjective well-being among Russian employees. 359 working employees took part in the study by filling-in questionnaires for the scales of Perfectionism, Impostor Phenomenon, Work Engagement, Subjective Happiness and Satisfaction with Life. Impostor Phenomenon is positively correlated with standards (positive effect of perfectionism) and discrepancy (negative effect of perfectionism). Multiple regression analyses indicate that standards are positive predictors and Impostor Phenomenon and discrepancy are negative predictors for work engagement and subjective well-being. These findings are of practical importance for psychological and organizational counselling.

Keywordsperfectionism, Impostor Phenomenon, work engagement, well-being, professional environment
AcknowledgmentThe reported study was funded by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project number 20-013-00743.
Publication date23.06.2022
Number of characters14635
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1183

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Kutuzova D.A. Organizacija dejatel'nosti i stil' samoreguljacii kak faktory professional'nogo vygoranija pedagoga-psihologa: Dis… kand. psihol. nauk. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian)

2. Osin E.N., Leont'ev D.A. Kratkie russkojazychnye shkaly diagnostiki sub#ektivnogo blagopoluchija: psihometricheskie harakteristiki i sravnitel'nyj analiz. Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: Jekonomicheskie i social'nye peremeny, 2020. № 1. P. 117–142. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.1.06 (In Russian)

3. Sheveleva M.S., Kornienko D.S., Permjakova T.M. Shkala fenomena samozvanca: psihometricheskie harakteristiki russkojazychnoj versii. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2021. V. 42. № 1. P. 133–143. https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920013343-3 (In Russian)

4. Abdollahi A., Hosseinian S., Panahipour H., Najafi M., Soheili F. Emotional intelligence as a moderator between perfectionism and happiness. School Psychology International, 2019 V. 40. № 1. P. 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0143034318807959

5. Bernard D.L., Jones S.C., Volpe V.V. Impostor phenomenon and psychological well-being: The moderating roles of John Henryism and school racial composition among black college students. Journal of Black Psychology, 2020. V. 46. № 2–3. P. 195–227. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0095798420924529

6. Bravata D.M., Watts S.A., Keefer A.L., Madhusudhan D.K., Taylor K.T., Clark D.M., Nelson R.S., Cockley K.O., Hagg H.K. Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020. V. 35. № 4. P. 1252–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05364-1

7. Clance P.R., Imes S.A. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 1978. V. 15. № 3. P. 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0086006

8. DiBartolo P.M., Rendon M.J. A critical examination of the construct of perfectionism and its relationship to mental health in Asian and African Americans using a cross-cultural framework. Clinical Psychology Review, 2011. V. 32. № 3. P. 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.09.007

9. d'Souza F., Egan S.J., Rees C.S. The relationship between perfectionism, stress and burnout in clinical psychologists. Behavior Change, 2011. V. 28. № 1. P. 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.28.1.17

10. Dudău D.P. The relation between perfectionism and impostor phenomenon. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014. V. 127. P. 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.226

11. Eley D.S., Bansal V., Leung J. Perfectionism as a mediator of psychological distress: Implications for addressing underlying vulnerabilities to the mental health of medical students. Medical Teacher, 2020. V. 42. № 11. P. 1301–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1805101

12. Fowler S.A., Davis L.L., Both L.E., Best L.A. Personality and perfectionism as predictors of life satisfaction: The unique contribution of having high standards for others. FACETS, 2018 V. 3. № 1. P. 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0084

13. Greenspon T.S. “Healthy Perfectionism” is an oxymoron! Reflections on the psychology of perfectionism and the sociology of science. Journal of Advanced Academics, 2000. V. 11. № 4. P. 197–208. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2000-631

14. Handley A.K., Egan S.J., Kane R.T., Rees C.S. The relationships between perfectionism, pathological worry and generalised anxiety disorder. BMC Psychiatry, 2014. V. 14. P. 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-98

15. Harari D., Steed L.B., Swider B.W., Breidenthal A.P. Is perfect good? A meta-analysis of perfectionism in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2018. V. 103. № 10. P. 1121–1144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000324

16. Henning K., Ey S., Shaw D. Perfectionism, the imposter phenomenon and psychological adjustment in medical, dental, nursing and pharmacy students. Medical Education, 1998. V. 32. № 5. P. 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00234.x

17. Hollender M.H. Perfectionism. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 1965. V. 6. №. 2. P. 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-440X (65)80016-5

18. Kanten P., Yesiltas M. The effects of positive and negative perfectionism on work engagement, psychological well-being and emotional exhaustion. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, V. 23. P. 1367–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671 (15)00522-5

19. Kira I., Shuwiekh H., Rice K., Ashby J. Is the “Almost Perfect Scale” almost perfect? The psychometric properties of the Arabic version of APS-R and its short form. Psychology, 2018. V. 9. P. 1875–1897. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.97109

20. Kreitchmann R.S., Abad F.J., Ponsoda V., Nieto M.D., Morillo D. Controlling for response biases in self-report scales: Forced-choice vs. psychometric modeling of Likert items. Frontiers in Psychology, 2019. V. 10. P. 2309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02309

21. Kun B., Takacs Z.K., Richman M.J., Griffiths M.D., Demetrovics Z. Work addiction and personality: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2021. V. 9. № 4. P. 945–966. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2020.00097

22. Lee L.E., Rinn A.N., Crutchfield K., Ottwein J.K., Hodges J., Mun R.U. Perfectionism and the imposter phenomenon in academically talented undergraduates. Gifted Child Quarterly, 2020. V. 65. № 3. P. 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0016986220969396

23. Matthews G., Clance P.R. Treatment of the impostor phenomenon in psychotherapy clients. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 1985. V. 3. № 1. P. 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1300/J294v03n01_09

24. Neureiter M., Traut-Mattausch E. Inspecting the dangers of feeling like a fake: An empirical investigation of the impostor phenomenon in the world of work. Frontiers in Psychology, 2016. V. 7. P. 1445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01445

25. Ofoghi Z., Besharat M.A. Perfectionism and physical ill-health. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010. V. 5. P. 1119–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.246

26. Pannhausen S., Klug K., Rohrmann S. Never good enough: The relation between the impostor phenomenon and multidimensional perfectionism. Current Psychology, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00613-7

27. Penniment K.J., Egan S.J. Perfectionism and learning experiences in dance class as risk factors for eating disorders in dancers. European Eating Disorders Review, 2012. V. 20. № 1. P. 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.1089

28. Rice S.P.M., Loscalzo Y., Giannini M., Rice K.G. Perfectionism in Italy and the USA. Measurement invariance and implications for cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2018. V. 36. № 1. P. 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000476

29. Shafique N., Gul S., Raseed S. Perfectionism and perceived stress: The role of fear of negative evaluation. International Journal of Mental Health, 2017. V. 46. № 4. P. 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2017.1345046

30. Smith M.M., Sherry S.B., Ray C.M., Lee-Baggley D., Hewitt P.L., Flett G.L. The existential model of perfectionism and depressive symptoms: Tests of unique contributions and mediating mechanisms in a sample of depressed individuals. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2019. V. 38. № 1. P. 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0734282919877777

31. Stoeber J., Harvey L.N. Multidimensional sexual perfectionism and female sexual function: A longitudinal investigation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2016. V. 45. № 8. P. 2003–2014. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10508-016-0721-7

32. Stoeber J., Kobori O., Tanno Y. Perfectionism and self-conscious emotions in British and Japanese students: Predicting pride and embarrassment after success and failure. European Journal of Personality, 2013. V. 27. № 1. P. 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1858

33. Tipton E., Hallberg K., Hedges L.V., Chan W. Implications of small samples for generalization: Adjustment and rules of thumb. Evaluation Review, 2017. V. 41. № 5. P. 472–505. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0193841X16655665

34. Vergauwe J., Wille B., Feys M., De Fruyt F. Fear of being exposed: the trait-relatedness of the impostor phenomenon and its relevance in the work context. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2015. V. 30. № 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9382-5

35. Wang K.T., Permyakova T.M., Sheveleva M.S. Assessing perfectionism in Russia: Classifying perfectionists with the Short Almost Perfect Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2016. V. 92. P. 174–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.12.044

36. Wang X., Cheng Z. Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 2020. V. 158. P. 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up