The role of dynamic properties in the social activity of the individual

Occupation: Head of the Department of social psychology of education and development
Affiliation: Saratov State University
Address: Saratov, Astrakhanskaya st., 83

E. E. Bocharova

Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of Social Psychology of Education and Development
Affiliation: Saratov State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

E. V. Nevsky

Occupation: Researcher of the Department of Social Psychology of Education and Development
Affiliation: Saratov State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 43 Issue 3

Pages

69-79

Abstract

The purpose of the study was the investigation of the role of functional and dynamic personality traits in the overall expression of social activity and commitment to its various forms in real and virtual environments. It is emphasized, that the study of the role of functional and dynamic properties in the commitment of young people to various forms of social activity is important from the point of view of social self-determination of the individual. Various studies assert the significant role of functional and dynamic properties in the activity realized by a person, but the properties that determine various forms of social activity are not specified. The study involved 500 people aged 16–35 years, the average age M=21.6; SD=5.6. The developed scales of social activity and secondary scales of civil, radical-political, Internet-network and leisure activity obtained on the basis of factorization were used; scales of self-assessment of commitment to activity in a real / virtual environment, a questionnaire of formal-dynamic properties of individuality by V.M. Rusalov. Sexual differences in the severity of formal-dynamic properties are established. The interrelationships of commitment to social activity and its various forms and formal-dynamic characteristics of individuality are studied. The analysis of formal-dynamic properties as predictors of social activity in real and virtual environments is carried out Discussion.and dynamic personality traits play a leading role in the overall commitment to social activity of young people. Its role is strongest in the commitment to the preferred civic and leisure social activities. Emotional characteristics in connection with communicative ergicity and plasticity are factors of Internet network activity. Radical protest activity is least conditioned by formal-dynamic properties. The importance of the ideological factor in the preference of the latter is assumed. Activity in the real and virtual environment is determined by different properties and personality: 20 % of activity in the real environment is explained by the characteristics of ergicity and speed in the communicative sphere, 6 % of activity in the virtual environment is due to communicative emotionality, intellectual speed and psychomotor ergicity, which indicates a more significant contribution of temperament to real activity than to virtual activity and, accordingly, less "cost" of the latter. This requires a more careful study of a person's virtual activity from the position of compensation or adaptation or ignoring situational changes external to him/her.

Keywords

personality, formal-dynamic properties of individuality, social activity, activity in real and virtual environments, temperament, predictors

Acknowledgment

The reported study was funded by Russian Science Foundation (RSF), project no.18-18-00298.

Publication date

23.06.2022

Number of characters

27992

Cite

GOST	Shamionov R., Bocharova E., Nevsky E. The role of dynamic properties in the social activity of the individual // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2022. – V. 43. – Issue 3 C. 69-79 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920020497-2-1 (circulation date: 04.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920020497-2
MLA	Shamionov, Rail M, Bocharova, E. E, Nevsky, E. V "The role of dynamic properties in the social activity of the individual." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 43.3 (2022):69-79. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920020497-2
APA	Shamionov R., Bocharova E., Nevsky E. (2022). The role of dynamic properties in the social activity of the individual. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 43(3), pp.69-79 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920020497-2

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 470

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ananyev B.G. O problemah sovremennogo chelovekoznaniya. Moscow: Nauka, 1977, 379 p. (In Russian)

2. Belous V.V., Bojazitova I.V. The determinants of development of the integral individuality. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2004. V. 25. №. 6. P. 40–52. (In Russian)

3. Belykh T.V. Integral Individuality of Students with Different Combinations of Rationality and Risk Appetite in Decision Making. Izv. Saratov Univ. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology. 2019. V. 8. № 1 (29). Р. 70–77. https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2019-8-1-70-77. (In Russian)

4. Bocharova E.E. Regulatory and Worldview Factors of Various Forms of Social Activity of Young People. Izv. Saratov Univ. Educational Aсmeology. Developmental Psychology. 2018. V. 7. №. 4 (28), Р. 333-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2018-7-4-333-345 (In Russian)

5. Vasyura S.А., Iogolevich N.I. Osobennosti integral'noy individual'nosti cheloveka v svyazi s urovnem razvitiya kommunikativnoy aktivnosti. Vestnik YuUrGU. Ser. Psikhologiya. 2012. № 6. P. 22–26. (In Russian)

6. Volochkov A.A., Mitrofanova E.N. Individuality activity: concept and structure. Perm University Herald. Series “Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology”. 2016. № 4(28). P. 64–75. https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2016-4-64-75. (In Russian)

7. Dorfman L.Ya. Metodologicheskiy analiz teorii integral'noy individual'nosti V.S. Merlina. Metodologiya i istoriya psikhologii. 2008. V. 3. № 3. P. 106–121. (In Russian)

8. Karpov A.V, Markova E.V. Stylistic Characteristics of the Decision-Making Process. Vestn. Yaroslav. gos. un-ta im. P. G. Demidova. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2016. № 3(37). P. 80–86. (In Russian)

9. Klimov Ye.A. Individual'nyy stil' deyatel'nosti v zavisimosti ot tipologicheskikh svoystv nervnoy sistemy. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazan. un-ta, 1969. 278 p. (In Russian)

10. Malykh S.B., Gindina E.D., Nadyseva V.V. The nature of temperamental individual features in adolescence. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2004. V. 25. № 6. P. 29–52. (In Russian)

11. Merlin V.S. Ocherki integral'nogo issledovaniya individual'nosti. Moscow: Pedagogika 1986. (In Russian)

12. Mulik A.B., Antonov G.V., Ulesikova I.V., Shatyr Y.A. Mechanisms of gender formation of destructive behavior and social activity of a person. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Philosophy. 2016. № 4 (34). P. 89–99. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu7.2016.4.10 (In Russian)

13. Nebylitsyn V.D. Psihofiziologicheskie issledovaniya individualnyh razlichij [Psychophysiological studies of individual differences]. Moscow: Nauka, 1976, 336 p. (In Russian)

14. Rusalov V.M. Temperament v strukture individual'nosti cheloveka: differentsial'no-psikhofiziologicheskiye i psikhologicheskiye issledovaniya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2012. (In Russian)

15. Rusalov V.M., Volkova E.V. Lichnostno-kognitivnye stili i ih svyaz' s temperamentom i harakterom cheloveka v period rannej yunosti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2015. V. 36. № 5, P. 32–42. (In Russian)

16. Smirnov D.O. Izucheniye religioznoy aktivnosti v strukture integral'noy individual'nosti starshikh shkol'nikov. Vestnik PGPU. Seriya “Psikhologiya”. 2000. № 1–2. P. 71–81. (In Russian)

17. Teplov B.M. Problemy individual'nykh razlichiy [Problems of individual differences]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the RSFSR, 1961. 531 p. (In Russian)

18. Tolochek V.A. Stili deyatel'nosti: resursnyy podkhod. Moscow, 2015. 366 p. (In Russian)

19. Trofimova I.N. Vzaimosvyaz' kharakteristik temperamenta s nekotorymi osobennostyami poznavatel'noy deyatel'nosti cheloveka. Voprosy psikhologii. 1997. № 1. P. 74–77. (In Russian)

20. Shamionov R.M. Social Activity and Risk Propensity of Students with Autonomous and Dependent Types of Subject Regulation. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo. 2021. V. 12. № 1. P. 94–112. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2021120107. (In Russian)

21. Shchukin M.R. O strukture individual'nogo stilya trudovoy deyatel'nosti. Voprosy psikhologii. 1984. № 6. P. 26–32. (In Russian)

22. Shchukin M.R. Individual'nyy stil' i integral'naya individual'nost': problemy i podkhody. Psikhol zhurn. 1995. V. 16. № 2. P. 103–113. (In Russian)

23. Kanafa-Chmielewska D. Self-Esteem, Self-Monitoring, and Temperamental Traits in Action: Who Is Involved in Humanitarian, Political, and Religious Non-profit Organizations? Frontiers in psychology. 2021. V.11: P. 573–689. https://doi.org/

24. Marengo D., Poletti I., Settanni M. The interplay between neuroticism, extraversion, and social media addiction in young adult Facebook users: Testing the mediating role of online activity using objective data. Addictive behaviors, 2020. V. 102: P. 106–150.

25. Poole K.L., Schmidt L.A. Early- and later-developing shyness in children: An investigation of biological and behavioral correlates. Developmental psychobiology. 2020. V. 62. № 5. P. 644–656

26. Shamionov R.M., Grigoryeva M.V., Grigoryev A.V. World Assumptions and Youth Identity as Predictors of Social Activity Preferences. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2019. V. 12. № 2. P. 115–133. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2019.0209.

27. Trofimova I.N. The interlocking between functional aspects of activities and a neurochemical model of adult temperament. In: Arnold M. С. (Ed) Temperaments: Individual Differences, Social and Environmental Influences and Impact on Quality of Life. New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc. 2016. P. 77–147.

28. Wilt J., Revelle W. The Big Five, Everyday Contexts and Activities, and Affective Experience. Personality and Individidual Differences. 2019. V. 1. № 136. P. 140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.032.