Russian psychology in the context of  global science: answering disputants

Occupation: scientific supervisor of the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation

Irina Mironenko

Occupation: professor
Affiliation: St. Petersburg State University
Address: Marinesko str., 6-31

Andrey Yurevich

Occupation: deputy director of Institute of Psychology RAS
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Russian Federation

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 41 Issue 3

Pages

113-121

Abstract

The article highlights main problem points of the discussion on the article by Zhuravlev, Mironenko, Yurevich “Psychological science in the global world: challenges and prospects”, the comments received on the article are discussed. The meanings of the concepts of “global” and “universal” psychology are clarified. Different approaches in contemporary international science to the question of whether global psychology can and should become universal in the future are considered. In contemporary discourse “universalists” dominate. Acknowledging heuristic power and significance of the results of the universalist approach, the authors question its lack of alternativeness and point out its limitations. Another focus of the discussion related to the question of the possibility of discovering the “universal” laws of the psychic, was the problem of the criteria of truth in relation to psychological knowledge − traditional, but revealing new aspects as a new type of collective subject of psychological knowledge develops in a multicultural world. Can a psychology, which is not claiming to discover the universal laws of the psychic be considered scientific? It is shown that psychological schools, which deny the possibility of universal psychology are well present in the discourse of the international psychological science, they entered it in 1980−1990 and their impact is growing, which shows by indicators of the number of publications and citation. It is argued that the unity of the tendencies of integration and differentiation in the formation of global psychological science, its development according to the network principle, is due to the diversity of modern humanity, thus, differentiated epistemology is a direct consequence of differentiation at the level of ontology, the very subject of study.

Keywords

Global psychology; universal psychology; criteria of truth of psychological knowledge; integration and differentiation of world science; place and role of Russian psychology in world science; indigenous theories; cultural psychology; critical psychology

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by RFH, grant №20-013-00260

Received

26.04.2020

Publication date

08.05.2020

Number of characters

28785

Cite

GOST	Zhuravlev A., Mironenko I., Yurevich A. Russian psychology in the context of global science: answering disputants // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2020. – V. 41. – Issue 3 C. 113-121 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920009335-4-1 (circulation date: 19.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920009335-4
MLA	Zhuravlev, A. L, Mironenko, Irina, Yurevich, Andrey "Russian psychology in the context of global science: answering disputants." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 41.3 (2020):113-121. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920009335-4
APA	Zhuravlev A., Mironenko I., Yurevich A. (2020). Russian psychology in the context of global science: answering disputants. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 41(3), pp.113-121 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920009335-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1251

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Ayzenk G. Zigmund Freyd. Upadok I konets psikhoanaliza. Irbi, 2019. (in Russian)

2. Vygotskiy L.S. Istoricheskiy smysl psikhologicheskogo krizisa. Sobr. soch.: v 6 t. V. 1. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1982. (in Russian)

3. Zhalagina T.A., Korotkina Ye. D. Global'naya psikhologiya: otistorii k perspektivam razvitiya. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. № 3. P. 119–123. (in Russian)

4. Zhuravlev A.L., Mironenko I.A., Yurevich A.V. Psikhologicheskaya nauka v global'nom mire: vyzovy I perspektivy. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2018. V. 39. № 2. P. 58–71. (in Russian)

5. Znakov V.V. Mnogomernyy mir cheloveka: tipy real'nosti, ponimaniya i sotsial'nogo znaniya. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya. 2012. № 3. P. 18–29. (in Russian)

6. Kitova D.A. Otechestvennaya psikhologiya v usloviyakh razvitiya global'nykh protsessov. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. № 2. P. 128–131. (in Russian)

7. Kovaleva YU.V. Psikhologiya v global'noy nauke: sovremennyy status I aktual'nyye zadachi razvitiya. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. № 1. P. 130–133. (in Russian)

8. Kornilova T.V. Setevaya organizatsiya kak put' integratsii psikhologii. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2018. V. 39. № 5. P. 99–105. (in Russian)

9. Korovkin S.YU. Rossiyskaya psikhologiya kak chast' universal'noy nauki. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. № 2. P. 132–136. (in Russian)

10. Leonov N.I. Vzaimodeystviye cheloveka I mira v paradigm konfliktologii. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2018. V. 39. № 5. P. 109–112. (in Russian)

11. Mazilov V.A. Psikhologiya v epokhu globalizatsii: poiski sobstvennogo puti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2018. V. 39. № 6. P. 114–118. (in Russian)

12. Mironenko I.A., Zhuravlev A.L. Biosotsial'naya problema v kontekste global'noy psikhologicheskoy nauki: ob universal'nykh kharakteristikakh cheloveka. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. № 6. P. 87–98. (in Russian)

13. Neverov A.N. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i global'nyy mir: vyzovy v epokhu turbulentnosti. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2018. V. 39. № 6. P. 119–122. (in Russian)

14. Rubinshteyn S.L. Chelovek i mir. Moscow, 2003 (in Russian)

15. SemonovV.Ye. Rossiyskaya psikhologicheskaya nauka v polimental'nom mire. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. № 1. P. 126–129. (in Russian)

16. Sergeyev S.F. Psikhologicheskaya nauka v ramkakh tekhnokoevolyutsii. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2018. V. 39. № 5. P. 106–108. (in Russian)

17. Feyyerabend P. Protiv metoda. Ocherk anarkhistskoy teorii poznaniya. Moscow: AST; Khranitel', 2007. (in Russian)

18. Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. New York, Springer, 2014.

19. Kitayama S., Cohen D. Handbook of Cultural Psychology. Guilford, 2010.

20. Methodological Thinking in Psychology: 60 Years Gone Astray? Eds.: Toomela A., Valsiner J. Information Age Publishing, 2010.

21. Mironenko I. Concerning the Vocabulary on Personality in Russian Psychology: “Subjekt” vs “Personality”. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2019. 12(2). 45–57.

22. UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2015.