Intentional space of post-event discourse on various internet sites

Occupation: Head of the Laboratory
Affiliation: Laboratory of speech psychology and psycholinguistics. Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Moscow, Yaroslavskaya St., 13

T. Grebenshchikova

Occupation: Senior researcher
Affiliation: Laboratory of speech psychology and psycholinguistics. Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Yaroslavskaya St., 13

V. Afinogenova

Occupation: Researcher
Affiliation: Laboratory of speech psychology and psycholinguistics. Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Yaroslavskaya St., 13

I. Zachiosova

Occupation: Senior researcher
Affiliation: Laboratory of speech psychology and psycholinguistics. Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Yaroslavskaya St., 13

T. Kubrak

Occupation: Researcher
Affiliation: Laboratory of speech psychology and psycholinguistics. Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Yaroslavskaya St., 13

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 41 Issue 3

Pages

78-91

Abstract

Discussion of events is an important part of the daily life of modern people; with the growth of the digitalization of society, it largely goes to the Internet. The authors note that in this communicative environment, influence and evaluation prevail over balance and the desire for objective analysis, antagonism in relation to someone else's position. In this work, the research questions related to the clarification of these ideas, as well as the identification of universal and changing characteristics of post-event Internet discourse depending on the topic, leading function, and direction of the interlocutors were raised. Popular discussions were selected as samples of discourse from various network resources, a total of 15 source messages and 764 comments on a political Internet site, city forum, family and film forums on a social network. To assess the psychological content of speech, an intent-analysis was used to identify the intentions of the subjects of communication and the elements of intentional content associated with the current interaction. There are 2 groups of referential objects that the communicants' intentions are aimed at: interactive and relevant to the topics discussed. 66 categories of intentions are described, 13 of which are universal for all types of post-event discourse. It is shown that, in general, post-event discourse is dominated by neutral analytical intentions of clarifying and presenting opinions, which also have the highest qualitative diversity. The exception is the discourse of the political platform, where the communicants most often realize the intentions of criticism and discredit. It was found that despite the modification of referential objects and intentional composition, the post-event discussion by tonality corresponds to the presentation of information in the initiating post. Among the types of post-event discourse, differences in the dialogical orientation of the interlocutors were revealed, which were expressed both in the prevalence of interactive reference objects over thematic ones and in maintaining the comments of the interlocutors compared to the original message.

Keywords

Post-event discourse, Internet discourse, intent-analysis, speech intentions, interaction of interlocutors on the Internet

Acknowledgment

This research was conducted with financial support by RFBR, grant №18-013-00163

Received

24.04.2020

Publication date

08.05.2020

Number of characters

40461

Cite

GOST	Pavlova N., Grebenshchikova T., Afinogenova V., Zachiosova I., Kubrak T. Intentional space of post-event discourse on various internet sites // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2020. – V. 41. – Issue 3 C. 78-91 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920009327-5-1 (circulation date: 20.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920009327-5
MLA	Pavlova, N., Grebenshchikova, T., Afinogenova, V., Zachiosova, I., Kubrak, T. "Intentional space of post-event discourse on various internet sites." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 41.3 (2020):78-91. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920009327-5
APA	Pavlova N., Grebenshchikova T., Afinogenova V., Zachiosova I., Kubrak T. (2020). Intentional space of post-event discourse on various internet sites. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 41(3), pp.78-91 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920009327-5

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1147

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aleksandrov YU.I., Aleksandrova N.L. Sub"ektivnyj opyt, kul'tura i social'nye predstavleniya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2009. (in Russian)

2. Afinogenova V.A., Pavlova N.D. Intencional'nye kategorii povsednevnogo diskursa v studencheskoj srede. Psihologiya diskursa. Problemy determinacii, vozdejstviya, bezopasnosti. Ser. “Trudy Instituta Psihologii RAN”. Eds.: A.L. ZHuravlev, N.D. Pavlova, I.A. Zachesova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2016. P. 102−127. (in Russian)

3. Vasilenko I.V. Kul'turnyj diskurs v regional'nom mediapole: lingvisticheskie parametry: diss. … kand. filol. nauk. Velikij Novgorod: Novgorodskij gosudarstvennyj universitet im. YAr. Mudrogo, 2015. (in Russian)

4. Gradosel'skaya G.V., Pil'gun M.A. Kommunikativnye processy v setevoj srede: mezhdisciplinarnyj analiz politicheski aktivnyh soobshchestv v Fejsbuke. Voprosy psiholingvistiki. 2015. V. 26. № 4. P. 44−58. (in Russian)

5. Grebenshchikova T.A. Intencional'nyj podhod k vydeleniyu diskursivnyh soobshchestv v internete. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya: elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal. 2019. V. 12. № 64. P. 3. (in Russian)

6. Grebenshchikova T.A., Zachesova I.A. Psihologiya povsednevnogo diskursa: Intencional'nyj aspekt. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2014. (in Russian)

7. Grebenshchikova T.A., Pavlova N.D., Afinogenova V.A. Razlichiya intencional'nogo soderzhaniya postsobytijnogo diskursa i diskursa foruma v internete. Cifrovoe obshchestvo kak kul'turno-istoricheskij kontekst razvitiya cheloveka: Sbornik nauchnyh statej i materialov mezhdunarodnoj konferencii. Ed.: R.V. Ershovoj. Kolomna: Izd-vo “Gosudarstvennyj social'no-gumanitarnyj universitet”, 2018. P. 122−127. (in Russian)

8. Grebenshchikova T.A., Pavlova N.D., Afinogenova V.A. Modifikaciya intencional'nogo prostranstva v postsobytijnom internet-diskurse. Psihologiya diskursa. Problemy determinacii, vozdejstviya, bezopasnosti. Ser. “Trudy Instituta Psihologii RAN”. Eds.: A.L. ZHuravleva, N.D. Pavlovoj, I.A. Zachesovoj. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2016. P. 201−219. (in Russian)

9. Dejk van [Dijk van T.A.] Diskurs i vlast': Reprezentaciya dominirovaniya v yazyke i kommunikacii. Moscow: Librokom, 2013. (in Russian)

10. Karasik V.I. O tipah diskursa. YAzykovaya lichnost': institucional'nyj i personal'nyj diskurs: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov. Volgograd: Izd-vo “Peremena”, 2000. P. 5−20. (in Russian)

11. Kirilina A.V. Internet-zhanr “kommentarij chitatelya”. Vestnik MGPU. Ser. “Filologiya. Teoriya yazyka. YAzykovoe obrazovanie”. 2015. V. 17. № 1. P. 67−76. (in Russian)

12. Latynov V.V. Psihologiya kommunikativnogo vozdejstviya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2013. (in Russian)

13. Pavlova N.D. Diskurs: aktual'nye napravleniya i perspektivy psiholingvisticheskih issledovanij. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2018. № 6. P. 16−26. (in Russian)

14. Pavlova N.D., Grebenshchikova T.A. Intent-analiz. Osnovaniya, procedura, opyt ispol'zovaniya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2017. (in Russian)

15. Pavlova N.D., Afinogenova V.A., Grebenshchikova T.A. Rechevoe vzaimodejstvie v neformal'nom studencheskom diskurse. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2017. № 5. P. 41−54. (in Russian)

16. Pavlova N.D., Voronin A.N., Grebenshchikova T.A., Kubrak T.A. i dr. Diskurs v sovremennom mire. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2011. (in Russian)

17. Psihologiya diskursa: problemy determinacii, vozdejstviya, bezopasnosti. Eds.: A.L. ZHuravlev, N.D. Pavlova, I.A. Zachesova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2016. P. 201−219. (in Russian)

18. Radina N.K. Intent-analiz onlajn-diskussij (na primere kommentirovaniya materialov internet-portala InoSMI.ru). Mediaskop. 2016. № 4. Electronny resurs: http://www.mediascope.ru/2238 (in Russian)

19. Romantovskij A.V. Metakommunikativnye indeksy v diskurse internet-kommentariev. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. A.S. Pushkina. 2015. V. 1. № 3. P. 141−149. (in Russian)

20. Ryzhkov M.S. Rechevye strategii i taktiki internet-kommunikacii (na materiale chatov). Internet-kommunikaciya kak novaya rechevaya formaciya. Nauch. red. T.N. Kolokol'ceva, O.V. Lutovinova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Flinta”, 2012. P. 72−87. (in Russian)

21. Sidorova I.G. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskie harakteristiki personal'nyh i interpersonal'nyh zhanrov internet-diskursa // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 2: YAzykoznanie. 2011. V. 14. № 2. P. 154−159. (in Russian)

22. Ushakova T.N., Pavlova N.D., Alekseev K.I., Latynov V.V., Cepcov V.V. Slovo v dejstvii. Intent-analiz politicheskogo diskursa. St. Petersburg: Izd-vo “Aletejya”, 2000. (in Russian)

23. SHejgal E.I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. Moscow: Izd-vo “Gnozis”, 2004. (in Russian)

24. Fishkin J. S. & Luskin R.C. Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Political. 2005. V. 40. № 3. Р. 284−298.

25. Spears R., Lea M., Postmes T., & Wolbert A. A SIDE look at computer-mediated interaction: Power and the gender divide. Strategic uses of social technology: An interactive perspective of social psychology. Eds.: Z. Birchmeier, B. Dietz-Uhler, & G. Stasser. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2011. P. 16−39.

26. Stroud N.J., Scacco M.J., Muddyman A., & Curry A.L. Changing deliberative norms on news organizations’ Facebook sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2015. № 2. P. 188–203.

27. Sukumaran A., Vezich S., McHugh M., & Nass C. Normative influences on thoughtful online participation. Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. N.Y.: ACM Press, 2011. P. 3401−3410.

28. Ulmer R.R., Seeger M.S., & Sellnow T.L. Post-crisis communication and renewal: Expanding the parameters of post-crisis discourse. Public Relations Review. 2007. V. 33. № 2. P. 130−134.