Psychological types of social community’s members’ subjectivity (on the example of twitter)

Occupation: Senior research officer of laboratory of psychology of personality
Affiliation: Federal State-financed Establishment of Science, Institute of psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation

Journal name

Psikhologicheskii zhurnal

Edition

Volume 41 issue 1

Pages

45-55

Abstract

The work has been devoted to studying the subjectivity of network community (NC) as a big social group. The analysis of the compliance of the NC life cycle's stages based on the current signs of a collective subject has been carried out. The finding of psychological types of the subjectivity of NC members, which manifest in the various ratio of the characteristics of the interaction of its members ― users of social network's (Twitter) was the research objective. It was supposed that it could be described by the structure of variables, which are corresponding to signs of a collective subject. And based on the factors of this structure the classification could be carried out, and psychological types of the subjectivity of members of NC could be allocated. Five factors of subjectivity ―The factor of interdependence, The factor of self-reproduction, The factor of the active self-reflection, The factor of coherence, The factor of the core of the community and The factor of the solution of problems which have been linked with the signs of a collective subject had been received.Their contents at the same time have had the specifics of NC. Four types of NC members' subjectivity which differed of their Internet interactions and the attitudes towards NC have been allocated. These types could be called as follows: The passive type, The connection type, The type of the active self-reflection and The type of active self-reproduction. The tasks for further work have been set.

Keywords

Big social group, collective subject, signs of subjectivity, informational society, social network, network community, community’s life cycle, psychological type of subjectivity.

Acknowledgment

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-00-00606(18-00-00605).

Received

30.10.2019

Publication date

27.12.2019

Number of characters

24668

Cite

GOST	Kovaleva Y. Psychological types of social community’s members’ subjectivity (on the example of twitter) // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – 2020. – V. 41. – issue 1 C. 45-55 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psy.jes.su/S020595920007308-4-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020595920007308-4
MLA	Kovaleva, Y. "Psychological types of social community’s members’ subjectivity (on the example of twitter)." Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 41.1 (2020):45-55. DOI: 10.31857/S020595920007308-4
APA	Kovaleva Y. (2020). Psychological types of social community’s members’ subjectivity (on the example of twitter). Psikhologicheskii zhurnal 41(1), pp.45-55 DOI: 10.31857/S020595920007308-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1453

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Agadulina E.R. Pol'zovateli social'nyh setej: sovremennye issledovanija // Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija. 2015. V. 4. № 3. P. 36–46. (in Russian)

2. Anufrieva K.V. “Selfi” kak forma projavlenija narcissizma lichnosti v sovremennom global'nom soobshhestve // Vestnik TvGU. Serija “Filosofija”. 2014. Vypusk 2. P. 79–90. (in Russian)

3. Atjagina A.P. Tvitter kak novaja diskursivnaja praktika v seti Internet // Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. 2012. № 4. P. 203–208. (in Russian)

4. Bresler M.G. Social'nye seti I setevye soobshhestva informacionnogo obshhestva. Ufa: RIC BashGU, 2014. (in Russian)

5. Bulavina M.A. Precedentnyj fenomen v tvitter-kommunikacii // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Russkij i inostrannye jazyki i metodiki ih prepodavanija. 2014. № 2. P. 48–56. (in Russian)

6. Vojskunskij A.E. Social'naja percepcija v social'nyh setjah // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 14. Psihologija. 2014. № 2. P. 90–104. (in Russian)

7. Gajdar K.M. Sub#ektnyj podhod k psihologii malyh grupp: istorija i sovremennoe sostojanie. Voronezh: VGU, 2006. (in Russian)

8. Danina M.M., Shaljapin A.A. Social'no-psihologicheskij aspekt issledovanija social'nyh setej v internete // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 10. Zhurnalistika. 2012. № 3. P. 16–33. (in Russian)

9. Emel'janova T.P., Zhuravlev A.L. Psihologija bol'shih social'nyh grupp kak kollektivnyh sub#ektov // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2009. V. 30. № 3. P. 5–15. (in Russian)

10. Zhuravlev A.L. Kollektivnyj sub#ekt kak fenomen i ponjatie v sovremennoj psihologii // Razrabotka ponjatij sovremennoj psihologii / Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 116–161. (in Russian)

11. Zhuravlev A.L., Kovaleva Ju.V. Global'naja psihologija: osnovnye podhody k ponimaniju // Jaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik. 2018. № 5. S. 201–209. (in Russian)

12. Zhuravlev A.L., Mironenko I.A., Jurevich A.V. Psihologicheskaja nauka v global'nom mire: vyzovy i perspektivy // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2018. V. 39. № 2. P. 58–71. (in Russian)

13. Zembatova O.S. Osobennosti virtual'noj samoprezentacii // Uchenye zapiski Krymskogo inzhenerno-pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Pedagogika. Psihologija. 2016. № 2 (4). P. 85–91. (in Russian)

14. Kovaleva Ju.V. Sovmestnaja reguljacija povedenija suprugov na razlichnyh jetapah zhiznennogo cikla sem'i // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2012. V. 33. № 5. P. 50–70. (in Russian)

15. Kovaleva Ju.V. Priznaki sovmestnoj zhiznedejatel'nosti setevogo soobshhestva i lichnostnye harakteristiki ego chlenov: na primere social'noj seti Tvitter. Chast' 1. Postanovka problemy i metodicheskij podhod // Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Social'naja i jekonomicheskaja psihologija. 2019. V. 4. № 1. P. 6–40. URL: http://soc-econom-psychology.ru/engine/documents/document659.pdf (data obrashhenija 10.04.2019). (in Russian)

16. Maksimova N.E., Aleksandrov I.O. Struktura i aktualgenez sub#ekta s pozicii sistemno-jevoljucionnogo podhoda // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2004. V. 25. № 2. P. 17–40. (in Russian)

17. Maslakova A.A. Permskoe tvitter-soobshhestvo: primer interaktivnoj subkul'tury // Socio- i psiholingvisticheskie issledovanija. 2013. Vyp. 1. P. 90–94. (in Russian)

18. Ovchinnikova I.G. Kommunikacija i identifikacija v social'nyh setjah: faktory, tipazhi, nacional'no-kul'turnaja specifika (na materiale social'noj seti Tvitter) // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Serija Politologija. 2013. № 2 (22). P. 143–156. (in Russian)

19. Patjaeva E.Ju. Internet-soobshhestva kak novaja social'naja real'nost': psihologicheskie zadachi “cheloveka-setevogo” // Institut psihologii Rossijskoj akademii nauk. Social'naja i jekonomicheskaja psihologija. 2018. V. 3. № 2. P. 74–109. URL: http://soc-econom-psychology.ru/engine/documents/document613.pdf (data obrashhenija 20.12.2018). (in Russian)

20. Povet'eva E.V. Intertekstual'nost' kak postmodernistskaja harakteristika sovremennogo internet-diskursa na primere bloga i mikrobloga // Nauchnoe mnenie. 2013. № 2. P. 36–41. (in Russian)

21. Psihologicheskie issledovanija global'nyh processov: predposylki, tendencii, perspektivy / Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, D.A. Kitova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. (in Russian)

22. Rossija v globalizirujushhemsja mire: mirovozzrencheskie i sociokul'turnye aspekty / Ed. V.S. Stepin. Moscow: Nauka, 2007. (in Russian)

23. Sosnin V.A., Kovaleva Ju.V. Sub#ektnost' bol'shih social'nyh grupp v uslovijah globalizacii: postanovka problemy na primere issledovanija setevyh soobshhestv // Psihologija cheloveka kak sub#ekta poznanija, obshhenija i dejatel'nosti. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 877–884. (in Russian)

24. Granovetter M. The sociological approaches to labor marketing analysis: a social structural view // The Sociology of Economic Life / Eds. Granovetter I., Swedberg R. Boulder, Westview Press, 1992. P. 244–245.

25. Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Graepel T. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013. V. 110. № 15. P. 5802–5805.