All
 
|
 
 


Dynamic approach to the research of the personality and the procedural analysis in psychology of the subject
 
PIIS020595920006073-6-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920006073-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
V. Znakov 
Occupation: сhief Researcher
Affiliation: Federal State-financed Establishment of Science, Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 40 issue 5
Pages27-34
Abstract

It is shown that the unified theoretical basis of the dynamic approach to the study of personality and procedural analysis in the psychology of the actor is the actor-activity approach of S.L. Rubinstein. L.I. Antsyferova applied it, developing a dynamic approach. She had her original, different from other scientists point of view on the psychological mechanisms of activity: the products of activity can be not only material values, but also the relationship of the man with other people, as well as the "revision" of his inner world, its reassessment and transformation. One of the important directions in the scientific work of L.I. Antsyferova is the psychological analysis of the phenomenon of wisdom, based on the description of it as a dynamic developing psychological system. She argued that the wise man is different from other people not only a more differentiated understanding of the world, but also an profound interpretation of their own and other people's life experiences. The focus on the analysis of the dynamics of mental development is also observed in the psychology of the actor: there is a rethinking by psychologists of the category of "procedurality", and in scientific knowledge the procedural approach to the analysis of mental phenomena is more often used than structural. In the procedural approach, the attention of psychologists focuses on understanding the processes and variations within a person, as well as on their temporary transformation. The most important is the analysis of formation, dynamics and novelty of personal and actor formations. The emphasis on the study of the procedural aspects of the psyche is common in modern studies of personality and actor.

KeywordsL.I. Antsyferova, wisdom, dynamic approach, procedural analysis
Received06.08.2019
Publication date04.09.2019
Number of characters27023
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 2166

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Antsyferova L.I. Mudrost' i ee projavlenija v raznye periody zhizni cheloveka // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2004. № 3. P. 17–24.
2. Antsyferova L.I. Gumanisticheski-jekzistencial'nyj podhod k mudrosti: Sposoby postizhenija istinnogo Ja i prizvanija cheloveka // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2005. № 3. P. 5–14.
3. Antsyferova L.I. Razvitie lichnosti i problemy gerontopsihologii. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2006.
4. Brushlinskij A.V. Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2006.
5. Grishina N.V. “Samoizmenenija” lichnosti: vozmozhnoe i neobhodimoe // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psihologija i pedagogika. 2018. V. 8. Vyp. 2. P. 126–138.
6. Zhuravlev A.L., Harlamenkova N.E. Dinamicheskij podhod k issledovaniju psihiki cheloveka // Institut cheloveka. Ideja i real'nost' / sost. M.I. Frolova. Moscow: URSS, 2018. P. 280–290.
7. Kostromina S.N., Grishina N.V. Processual'nyj podhod v psihologii lichnosti // Psihologija cheloveka kak sub#ekta poznanija, obshhenija i dejatel'nosti / Eds. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.V. Znakov. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 506–512.
8. Leont'ev D.A. Mudrost' kak integral'naja harakteristika lichnostnogo potenciala // Lichnostnyj potencial: struktura i diagnostika / Ed. D. A. Leont'eva. Moscow: Smysl, 2011. P. 92–106.
9. Leont'ev D.A. Il'ja Prigozhin i psihologija XXI veka // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2018. V. 39. № 3. P. 11–14.
10. Nikitin E.P. Ob#jasnenie – funkcija nauki. Moscow: Nauka, 1970.
11. Sergienko E.A. Problema sootnoshenija ponjatij sub#ekta i lichnosti // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2013. V. 34. № 2. P. 5–16.
12. Smirnov A.V. Soznanie. Logika. Jazyk. Kul'tura. Smysl. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul'tury, 2015.
13. Fuko M. Muzhestvo istiny. Upravlenie soboj i drugimi II. Kurs lekcij, prochitannyh v Kollezh de Frans v 1983–1984 uchebnom godu. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2014
14. Harlamenkova N.E. Zhizn' uchenogo – poisk i otkrytie nejavnogo znanija v javnom: k jubileju L.I. Ancyferovoj // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2014. V. 35. № 6. P. 5–16.
15. Shtompka P. Sociologija social'nyh izmenenij. Moscow: Aspekt–Press, 1996.
16. Jepshtejn M. Ot mudrosti k filosofii – i obratno // Jepshtejn M. Znak probela: O budushhem gumanitarnyh nauk. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2004. P. 788–806.
17. Baltes P. B. Wisdom as Orchestration of Mind and Virtue. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development, 2004.
18. Baltes P., Kunzmann U. Wisdom // The Psychologist. 2003. V. 16. № 3. P. 131–132.
19. Giordano P.J. Being or becoming: Toward an open-system, process-centric model of personality // Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. 2015. V. 49. Iss. 4. P. 757-771.
20. Giordano P.J. Individual personality is best understood as process, not structure // Culture and Psychology. 2017. V. 23. Iss. 4. P. 502–518.
21. Rafaeli-Mor E., Gotlib I.H., Revelle W. The Meaning and Measurement of Self-Comlexity // Personality and Individual Differences. 1999. N 27. P. 341–356.
22. Sternberg R. Wisdom, Intelligence and Creativity Synthesized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up