The concept of psychological safety and its justification from different scientific perspectives

 
PIIS020595920002985-9-1
DOI10.31857/S020595920002985-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: chief research officer, laboratory of psychology of subject development in normal and post-traumatic states
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Russian Federation
Journal namePsikhologicheskii zhurnal
EditionVolume 40 Issue 1
Pages28-37
Abstract

  

Abstract (other)In accordance with the purpose of the research, which consisted in comparing of different representations of human safety, the justification of “psychological safety” concept was carried out. As the initial basis of the analysis of “safety”, the fundamental philosophical problem – Human problem – is considered; the methodological and theoretical foundations for studying of psychological safety from the position of the psychology of subject are defined. It is shown that the different attitude of the subject to the world (tragic, comic, etc. according to S. L. Rubinstein) is decisive in the experience of his being as dangerous or safe; the ways of the subject’s regulation of the threat experience are described depending on the life circumstances – everyday and intensive stresses. The concept of “psychological safety” is considered in relation to other scientific concepts – psychological well-being, resilience and hardiness.
Keywordshuman problem, subject, psychological safety, the problem of life and death, psychological well-being, intensive stress, hardiness, resilience.
AcknowledgmentThe study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project № 15-36-11108).
Received25.02.2019
Publication date26.02.2019
Number of characters32929
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 6, views: 2791

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alekseev A.P., Alekseeva I. Ju. Informacionnaja vojna v informacionnom obshhestve // Voprosy filosofii. 2016. № 11. P. 5–14. (In Russian)

2. Baeva I.A., Semikin V. V. Bezopasnost’ obrazovatel’noj sredy, psihologicheskaja kul’tura i psihicheskoe zdorov’e shkol’nikov // Izvestija Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena. 2005. № 5 (12). P. 7–19. (In Russian)

3. Berdjaev N.A. O naznachenii cheloveka. Moscow: Respublika, 1993. (In Russian)

4. Brushlinskij A. V. Psihologija sub#ekta / Ed. V. V. Znakov. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”; St. Petersburg: Aletejja, 2003. (In Russian)

5. Golovej L.A., Strizhickaja O. Ju. Osobennosti struktury povsednevnyh stressorov i resursov lichnosti v raznye periody vzroslosti // Psihologija povsednevnogo i travmaticheskogo stressa: ugrozy, posledstvija i sovladanie / Eds. A. L. Zhuravlev, N. V. Tarabrina, E. A. Sergienko, N. E. Harlamenkova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2016. P. 27–49. (In Russian)

6. Denisov V. V. Bezopasnost’ kak problema vyzhivanija chelovechestva // Filosofija i obshhestvo. 2004. № 3. P. 24–42. (In Russian)

7. Zhuravlev A.L., Tarabrina N. V. Psihologicheskaja bezopasnost’: na puti k kompleksnym, mezhdisplinarnym issledovanijam (vmesto predislovija) // Problemy psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti / Eds. A. L. Zhuravlev, N. V. Tarabrina. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2012. P. 5–21. (In Russian)

8. Kritskaja V.P., Meleshko T. K. Patopsihologija shizofrenii. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2015. (In Russian)

9. Laktionova A. I. Vzaimosvjaz’ smyslovyh obrazovanij i refleksivnosti s zhiznesposobnost’ju cheloveka // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2017. V. 38. № 5. P. 27–40. (In Russian)

10. Lektorskij V. A. Vozmozhny li nauki o cheloveke? // Voprosy filosofii. 2015. № 5. P. 3–15. (In Russian)

11. Mahnach A. V. Zhiznesposobnost’ kak mezhdisciplinarnoe ponjatie // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2012. V. 33. № 6. P. 84–98. (In Russian)

12. Mahnach A. V. Zhiznesposobnost’ cheloveka kak predmet izuchenija v psihologicheskoj nauke // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2017. V. 38. № 4. P. 5–16. (In Russian)

13. Nikitin E. P. Duhovnyj mir: organichnyj kosmos ili razbegajushhajasja vselennaja? Moscow: Rossijskaja politicheskaja jenciklopedija (ROSSPJeN), 2004. (In Russian)

14. Pozdnjakov A. I. Kategorija bezopasnosti: sravnitel’nyj analiz razlichnyh podhodov k opredeleniju // Nacional’naja bezopasnost’: nauchnoe i gosudarstvennoe upravlencheskoe soderzhanie: materialy Vseross. nauch. konf., 4 dek. 2009 g. / Ed. S. S. Sulakshina i dr. Moscow: Nauchnyj jekspert, 2010. P. 192–202. (In Russian)

15. Rubinshtejn S. L. Chelovek i mir. Moscow: Nauka, 1997. (In Russian)

16. Tarabrina N.V., Harlamenkova N. E., Padun M. A., Hazhuev I. S., Kazymova N. N., Byhovec Ju.V., Dan M. V. Intensivnyj stress v kontekste psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2017. (In Russian)

17. Teorija poznanija: V 4 t. V. 4. Poznanie social’noj real’nosti / Eds. V. A. Lektorskij, T. I. Ojzerman. Moscow: Mysl’, 1995. (In Russian)

18. Trubnikov N.N. O smysle zhizni i smerti. Moscow: Rossijskaja politicheskaja jenciklopedija (ROSSPJeN), 1996. (In Russian)

19. Harlamenkova N.E., Tarabrina N. V., Byhovec Ju.V., Vorona O. A., Kazymova N. N., Dymova E. N., Shatalova N. E. Psihologicheskaja bezopasnost’ lichnosti: implicitnaja i jeksplicitnaja koncepcii. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2017. (In Russian)

20. Hohrina E. N. Filosofskie osnovanija vyzhivanija chelovechestva v kontekste global’nogo jekologicheskogo krizisa: Avtoref. diss. … d-ra filosofskih nauk. Samara, 2001. (In Russian)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up