The Relationship between Innovative Development and the Quality of Life of the Countries of the Asia-Pacific Region and the Subjects of the Far East

 
PIIS013128120022348-3-1
DOI10.31857/S013128120022348-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Leading Researcher
Affiliation: Research Institute of Regional Economy of the North, North-Eastern Federal University
Address: 58 Belinsky str, Yakutsk, 677027, Russian Federation
Journal nameProblemy Dalnego Vostoka
EditionIssue 5
Pages47-61
Abstract

The subject of the study is the socio-economic system "innovation activity—the quality of life of the population". The purpose of the work is to determine the degree of interrelation of innovative development and the standard of living of the population in the regions. The research is based on the application of standard methods of data collection and processing, correlation analysis and rating assessment. The official data of statistical collections, foreign and domestic sources of ratings on the global innovation Index (GII), the Human Development Index (HDI), the Quality of life index (QLI) and the value of the Russian Regional Innovation Index (RRII) were used as an information base. Comparative analyses and assessments were carried out for the regions of the Far East and neighboring countries of the Asia-Pacific Region (APR). According to the GII-2021 rating, the APR countries are among the top 15, Russia ranks 45th out of 132 countries, and according to the HDI-2019: Hong Kong is among the top five, the rest of the countries are ranked 11th, Russia occupies 52 position. Khabarovsk and Primorsky Territory, the Republic of Buryatia occupy the leading positions according to the RRII rating. On the basis of the author's econometric model “Triple Helix”, the shares of the actors' contribution to the overall innovative development of the regions of the Far East are determined. It is shown that the three leaders (Sakhalin Region, Khabarovsk and Kamchatka Territory) QLI values than in Russia as a whole, and six regions of the Far East are characterized by an average level of quality of life of the population. The results of the study of the relationship between innovative development and quality of life confirm the existence of a certain correlation between the indicators of RRI/QLI and GII/HDI, which allows us to use standard regression formulas for modeling predictive estimates of the impact of innovative development on improving the level and quality of life of the population in the regions. The results of the work can be useful to the executive bodies of the state authorities of the regions for strategic planning and management of the development of the innovative economy and civil society of the macroregions.

KeywordsAsia-Pacific region, Far East, innovative development; level and quality of life, rating assessment, correlation analysis
AcknowledgmentThe article was prepared as part of the implementation of the state task of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation under by topic “Patterns of spatial organization and spatial development of socio-economic systems of the northern region of the resource type” (the project No. FSRG-2020-0010).
Received28.07.2022
Publication date24.10.2022
Number of characters26419
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 483

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arkhipova M.Yu., Bazhenova T.A. Issledovanie vliyaniya innovacionnogo razvitiya regiona na osnovnye harakteristiki kachestvo zhizni naseleniya (Investigation of the Impact of Innovative Development of the Region on the Main Characteristics of the Quality of Life of the Population). Drukerovskij vestnik. 2017. No. 4 (18). S. 176–191. (In Russ.)

2. Balashova S.A., Nakhatakyan E.O. Sistematizaciya podhodov k ocenke social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya stran po indeksu blagosostoyaniya (Systematization of the approaches assessing socioeconomic development of the countries by using welfare index). Vestnik Rossijskogo Universiteta Druzhby Narodov. Seriya: Ekonomika. 2017. Vol. 25. No. 2. S. 219–232. DOI: 10.22363/2313–2329–2017–25–2–219–232. (In Russ.)

3. Bykovskaya N.V., Vlasova I.M., Kamaikina I.S. Innovacionnoe razvitie regionov (Innovative Development of Regions). Ekonomika sel'skogo hozyajstva Rossii. 2021. No. 7. S. 12–17. DOI: 10.32651/217–12. (In Russ.)

4. Dubrova T.A., Klochko Yu.S. Analiz kachestva zhizni naseleniya s uchetom razvitiya innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti v regionah Rossii (Analysis of the Quality of Life and its Connection with the Development of Innovative Activities in Russian Regions). Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. 2016. No. 9 (74). S. 908–914. (In Russ.)

5. Fedotov A.A. Chelovecheskij i nauchno-tekhnicheskij potencial: korrelyacionnyj regional'nyj analiz (Human and Scientific-Technical Potential: Regional Correlation Analysis). Narodonaselenie. 2020. Vol. 23. S. 61–67. DOI: 10.19181/population.2020.23.4.6. (In Russ.)

6. Fedotov A.A. Kachestvo zhizni i chelovecheskij potencial v koncepciyah ustojchivogo i chelovecheskogo razvitiya (chast' vtoraya) (Quality of life and human potential in the concepts of sustainable and human development (Part Two)). Narodonaselenie. 2021. Vol. 24. No. 3. S. 42–50. DOI: 10.19181/population.2021.24.3.4. (In Russ.)

7. Fedotov A.A. Nauchno-tekhnicheskij potencial i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya: poisk vzaimosvyazej (Scientific and Technological Potential and the Quality of Life of the Population: the Search for Interrelationships). Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. 2021. No. 11–3 (62). S. 251–257. DOI: 10.24412/2500–1000–2021–11–3–251–257. (In Russ.)

8. Gagulina N., Samoylov A.,Novikov A., Yanova E. Innovation-Driven Development and Quality of Living Under Conditions of Digital Economy. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020. Vol. 157. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202015704037

9. Gareeva N.A. Sravnitel'nyj analiz innovacionnyh profilej liderov regional'nyh ekonomicheskih sistem (Comparative Analysis of Innovative Profiles of Leaders of Regional Economic Systems). Regional'nye problemy preobrazovaniya ekonomiki. 2021. No. 11. (133). S. 42–47. DOI: 10.26726/1812–7096–2021–11–42–47. (In Russ.)

10. Grinchel B.M., Nazarova E.A. Vliyanie innovacionnosti regionov na konkurentnuyu privlekatel'nost' i ustojchivost' ekonomiki i kachestva zhizni (The Influence of Regional Innovation on the Competitive Attractiveness and Sustainability on the Economy and Quality of Life). Innovacii. 2017. No. 8 (226). S. 105–113 (In Russ.)

11. Grinchel V.N., Nazarova E.A. Vliyanie innovacionnosti regionov na konkurentnuyu privlekatel'nost' i ustojchivost' ekonomiki i kachestva zhizni (The Influence of the Innovativeness of Regions on the Competitive Attractiveness and Sustainability of the Economy and Quality of Life). Innovacii. 2017. No. 8 (226). S. 105–113. (In Russ.)

12. Ibragimov A.G., Platonovsky N.G. Uroven' i kachestvo zhizni naseleniya Rossii: sostoyanie i problem (The Level and Quality of Life of the Russian Population: Status and Problems). Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo. 2021. No. 6 (131). S. 144–146. DOI: 10.34925/EIP.2021.131.6.025. (In Russ.)

13. Indikatory innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti: 2022 (Innovation Performance Indicators: 2022). Statisticheskij sbornik / V.V. Vlasova, L.M. Gohberg, G.A. Gracheva i dr.; Nac. issled. un-t «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». M.: HSE, 2022. 292 s. (In Russ.)

14. Kapran N. Ob izobretatel'skoj aktivnosti Rossijskoj Federacii v otchete «Global'nyj innovacionnyj indeks 2021» (On Innovation and Invention Activity in Russia According to “2021 Global Innovation Index”). Intellektual'naya sobstvennost. Promyshlennaya sobstvennost. 2021. No. 12. S. 31–39. (In Russ.)

15. Kosyakova I.V., Shepelev V.M. Innovacionnoe razvitie regionov Rossii (Innovative Development of Russian Regions). Vektor ekonomiki. 2019. No. 11 (41). 39 s. URL: www.vectoreconomy.ru (accessed: 01.08.2022). (In Russ.)

16. Kryukov V.A., Shmat V.V. Aziatskaya Rossiya — usloviya i prepyatstviya postupatel'noj diversifikacii ekonomiki makroregiona (Asian Russia — Conditions and Obstacles of Progressive Diversification of the Macro-Region Economy). Prostranstvennaya ekonomika. 2022. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 34–72. DOI: 10.14530/se.2022.1.034–072 (In Russ.)

17. Kudryavtseva S.S., Shinkevich A.İ., Ostanina S.S. et all. The Methods of National Innovation Systems Assessing. International Review of Management and Marketing, 2016. Vol. 6. No. 2. S. 225–230.

18. Makaruk V.E. Kompleksnyj indeks innovacionnogo razvitiya regionov (The Experience and Problems of Construction Regions Integrated Index of Innovative Development). Nauka i innovacii. 2017. No. 1 (167). S. 38–42. (In Russ.)

19. Mikheeva N.N. K voprosu ob innovacionnyh rejtingah rossijskih regionov (On the Issue of Innovative Ratings of Russian Regions). Sovremennye proizvoditel'nye sily. 2013. No. 2. S. 54–67. (In Russ.)

20. Mityakov S.N., Mityakova O.I., Murashova N.A. Innovacionnoe razvitie regionov Rossii: metodika rejtingovaniya (Innovative Development of Russian Regions: Rating Methodology). Innovacii. 2017. No. 9. S. 97–104. (In Russ.)

21. Myreev A.N., Popov A.A., Fedorova S.V. Kachestvo zhizni naseleniya v usloviyah transformacii ekonomiki: teoriya, problemy, praktika (na primere rajonov Krajnego Severa i Arkticheskoj zony) (The Quality of Life of the Population in the Conditions of Economic Transformation: Theory, Problems, Practice (on the example of the regions of the Far North and the Arctic zone)). Yakutsk: NEFU Publishing House. 2015. 284 s. (In Russ.)

22. Nekhoda E.V., Roshina I.V., Pak V.D. Kachestvo zhizni: problemy izmereniya (Quality of Life: Problems of Measurement). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika. 2018, No. 43. S. 107–125. (In Russ.)

23. Nesterova O.A., Pozharnitskaya O.V. Ocenka blagosostoyaniya s pozicii ustojchivogo chelovecheskogo razvitiya: vozmozhnosti mezhdunarodnyh indeksov (Assessing Well-Being from the Perspective of Sustainable Human Development: the Potential of International Indices). Voprosy innovatsionnoy ekonomiki. 2018. Vol. 8. No. 3. S. 335–348. DOI: 10.18334/vinec.8.3.39338 (In Russ.)

24. Nikulina N.L, Bagaryakov A.V. Vliyanie innovacionnogo razvitiya na kachestvo zhizni naseleniya regiona (Influence of Innovation Development on the Region Population Quality of Life). Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Sociologiya. Ekonomika. Politika. 2015. No. 1. S. 70–72. (In Russ.)

25. Okrepilov V., Gagulina N. Structural Transformations of Innovative Development and Quality of Life in Modern Environment. E3S Web of Conferences. 2021. Vol. 258. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202125806008

26. Okrepilov V., Gagulina N., Getmanova G. Factors of Innovative Development of Regions in the Concept of Quality Economics. The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2020. P. 409–418. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.03.46

27. Sirotin V., Arkhipova M. Innovative Development and Quality of Life Interaction. Science, Technology and Innovation in the Emerging Markets Economy Proceedings of the 22th International Conference on Management of Technology (IAMOT 2013). Brazil. Porto Alegre. 2013. URL: https://publications.hse.ru/chapters/98774539 (accessed: 19.07. 2022)

28. Smirnov R.V. Innovacionnoe razvitie regionov: obzor issledovanij (Innovative Development of Regions: a Review of Research). Sovremennye aspekty ekonomiki. 2020. No. 2 (270). S. 19–27. (In Russ.)

29. Tikhy V.I., Korneva O.V. Regional'nyj indeks innovacij: metodika rascheta i ee primenenie dlya ocenki innovacionnogo razvitiya regionov (Regional Innovation Index: Calculation Methodology and its Application for Assessing the Innovative Development of Regions). Innovacii v obshchestve: Sbornik statej. Orel: Oryol Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation named after V.V. Lukyanov. 2017. S. 15–19. (In Russ.)

30. Wang Yushan. Innovacionnoe razvitie kitajskih regionov: opyt i rekomendacii dlya Rossii (Innovative Development of Chinese Regions: Experience and Recommendations for Russia). MIR (Modernizaciya. Innovacii. Razvitie). 2021. Vol. 12. No. 2. S. 145–159. DOI: 10.18184/2079–4665.2021.12.2.145–159. (In Russ.)

31. Yakunina R.P. Ocenka urovnya chelovecheskogo kapitala pri pomoshchi modernizirovannogo indeksa chelovecheskogo razvitiya (Assessment of Human Capital Level Using the Upgraded Human Development Index). Vestnik Samarskogo Gosudarstvennogo Ekonomicheskogo Universiteta. 2021. No. 4. (198). S. 360–374. DOI: 10.46554/1993–0453–2021–4–198–38–46. (In Russ.)

32. Yangirova E.I., Iskakov M.R. Ocenka chelovecheskogo razvitiya v Rossijskoj Federacii (Human Development Assessment in the Russian Federation). Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii. 2022. Vol. 18. No. 2. S. 248–258. DOI: 10.19181/lsprr.2022.18.2.9. (In Russ.)

33. Yashin S.N., Korobova Yu.S. Metod rascheta integral'nogo indeksa innovacionnogo razvitiya regiona (Method of Calculating the Integral Index of Innovative Development of the Region). Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya. 2017. No. 10 (4). S. 360–374. DOI: 10.24891/fa.10.4.360. (In Russ.)

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up