PII | S086904990015424-8-1 |
DOI | 10.31857/S086904990015424-8 |
Publication type
|
Article
|
Status
|
Published
|
Authors |
Occupation: Publisher and Editor of Politics First Affiliation: Royal Holloway
University of London
Journal “Politics First”
Address: United Kingdom (Great Britain), London
|
Journal name | Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost |
Edition | Issue 3 |
Pages | 136-150 |
Abstract | This essay examines how the British Government, in the lead-up to Operation Barbarossa, perceived the notion of an anti-German coalition comprising Britain and the Soviet Union British diplomats, including Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden and Ambassador Sir Stafford Cripps, assessed the extent to which the Soviet Government was committed to its Non-Aggression Treaty with Germany and how far Josef Stalin was prepared to appease Adolf Hitler and thereby prevent a military conflict with the Third Reich. As a consequence, following the fall of France to the Germans in the summer of 1940, of Britain perilously standing alone against the might of Nazi Germany, Whitehall looked increasingly to the USSR, a country which many British officials traditionally harboured feelings of grave disquiet over, as a means of salvation. However, British diplomats reported, indeed, lamented, that such was the fear felt by the Soviet Government of a war with Germany, together with Stalin’s ingrained distrust of Britain, that the chances of Moscow abandoning its Non-Aggression Treaty with Berlin and joining forces with London in an anti-Hitler coalition were negligible. |
Keywords | Non-Aggression Treaty, Balkans, Turkey, Iran, Baltic States, America, Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Anthony Eden, Stafford Cripps, Ivan Maisky, Wehrmacht, Red Army, Soviet frontier, Baku, anti-Nazi coalition, anti-Hitler coalition |
Received | 25.06.2021 |
Publication date | 27.06.2021 |
Number of characters | 56578 |
|
|
|
|
|