All
 
|
 
 


Distance between states of modernization of makroregions of the Russia and their civilizational contexts
 
PIIS086904990011603-5-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Nikolay Lapin 
Occupation: Head
Affiliation: Center for the Study of Social and Cultural Changes, RAS, Institute of Philosophy
Address: 14, Volhonka st., Moscow, Russa, 119991
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 5
Pages61-71
Abstract

The author has revealed the signifi cant distance between the States of modernization of macroregions-Federal districts of the Russian Federation on the socio-economic and socio-cultural indexes four modernizational cluster. The distance between them are in the nature of hierarchy that is saved the serious socio-political risks. The author also shows that identifi ed distance have deep cultural, civilizational reasons. He set out his understanding of civilization, especially the Russian and had projected two groups of subcivilization on the Russian makroregional space – three Russian Orthodox and three compound-arranged, complexed. Finally, the author proposed a strategy of gradual integrating modernization of the macro-regions as subcivilizations.

Keywordsmacroregion, state of modernization, modernizational cluster of regions, civilization, Russian civilization, subcivilization, strategy of integrating modernization of macro-regions
Received16.09.2020
Publication date17.10.2015
Number of characters828
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 447

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Bzhezinskij Z. (1998) Velikaya shahmatnaya doska [The Grand Chessboard] Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.
2. Chernysh M.F. (2015) Civilizacionnye osnovaniya obshchestva i social’naya struktura [Civilizational foundations of society and social structure] Rossiya kak civilizaciya: materialy k razmyshleniyu [Russia as a civilization: materials for consideration]. Moscow: Mir Rossii.
3. Eisenstadt S. (2003) Comparativ Civilization and Multiple Modernities. Leiden. Koninklijke: Brill.
4. He Chuanqi (2012) Modernization Science. The Ptinciples and Methods of National Advancement. Berlin: Springer.
5. He CHuan'ci (2011) Obzornyj doklad o modernizacii v mire i Kitae (2001–2010). [A survey report on the modernization of the world and China (2001–2010)]l. Moscow: Ves' mir.
6. Lapin N.I. (2015) Fundamental'nye cennosti civilizacionnogo vybora XXI stoletiya [Fundamental values of civilization choice in the XXI century] Voprosy fi losofi i, no. 4, pp. 3–16; no. 6, pp. 3–17.
7. Lapin N.I. (2009) Mnogomernost’ sociokul’turnogo prostranstva Rossii [Multidimensionality of social and cultural space of Russia] Regiony Rossii: sociokul’turnye portrety regionov v obshcherossijskom kontekste [Regions of Russia: socio-cultural portraits of regions on a national context]. Moscow: Academia, pp. 15–21.
8. Lapin N.I. (2011) Sociokul'turnye factory rossiiskoi stàgnacii i modernisacii [Sociocultural factors and the modernization of the Russian stagnation] Soñiologicheskie issledovaniya, pp. 3–17.
9. Nazaretyan A.P. (2007) Antropologiya nasiliya i kul’tura samoorganizacii: Ocherki po ehvolyucionno-istoricheskoj psihologii [Anthropology of violence and the culture of self-organization: Essays on the evolutionary history of psychology] Moscow: LKI.
10. Panarin A.S. (1999) Rossiya v ciklah mirovoj istorii [Russia in the cycles of world history] Moscow: MGU.
11. Problemy sotsioculturnoy modernizatsii regionov Rossii (2013) [Problems of social and cultural modernization of Russian regions] Moscow: Academia.
12. Rossiya kak civilizaciya: materialy k razmyshleniyu (2015) [Russia as a civilization: materials for consideration] Moscow: Mir Rossii.
13. Stepin V.S. Teoreticheskoe znanie (2000) [Theoretical knowledg] Moscow: Progress-Tradiciya.
14. Turovskij R.F. Kul’turnye landshafty Rossii (1998) [Cultural landscapes of Russia ] Moscow: Institut naslediya.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up