Dialectics of the Individual and the Сommunal in the Communication Activity of the Modern Society

 
PIIS086904990011592-3-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Nicholas Ugreshsky Orthodox Seminary
Address: 1, bld. 6, St. Nicholas ar., Dzerzhinsky, Moscow region, 140090, Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 6
Pages142-150
Abstract

Interrelation between the individual and the collective as forms of the human activity in the context of their day to day existence based on the dual opposition of “communication and personality” is analyzed in the article. The existence of two antithetical tendencies that go in ambivalence is educed. The dialectical antinomy appears that modern society of difference as collective phenomenon provokes individualism and the growing potential of the individualism enforces differences’ accumulation. The conclusion is made about the specifi c character of modern communication activity where the individual progressively dominates contrary to hardened beliefs about all around massifi cation.

Keywordscommunication, variety, individual, collective, dual opposition, philosophical sense
Received16.09.2020
Publication date17.12.2015
Number of characters665
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 121

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Akhiezer A.S. (2006b) Trudi [Works]. Ìoskva: Noviy khronograph.

2. Akhiezer A.S. (2006a) Vozmozhen li dialog civilizaciy [Is the dialog between civilizations possible]. Civilizacii. Vyp. 7: Dialog cultur i civilizaciy [Civilizations. Iss. 7: Dialog between cultures and civilizations]. Ìoskva: Nauka.

3. Apel K.-O. (1988) Diskurs und Verantwortung. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

4. Fedotova V.G. (2005) Khoroshee obschestvo [Good Society]. Ìoskva: Progress-Tradiciya.

5. Fedotova V.G., Kolpakov V.A., Fedotov N.N. (2011) Menyauschayasya socialnost: buduschee kapitalizma [The changing sociality: the future of the capitalism]. Voprosi fi losofi i, no. 6, pp. 3–15.

6. Marcuse H. (2009) Odnomerniy chelovek [One dimensional man]. Ìoskva: ÀSÒ.

7. Perelman Ch. (1979) The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications. Dordrecht (Holland): Reidel Publishing Company.

8. Rathje S. (2014) Multikollektivitat. Schlusselbegriff der modernen Kulturwissenschaften. Kultur und Kollektiv. Festschrift fur Klaus P. Hansen. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag. S. 39–60.

9. Ruzavin G.I. (1985) Metodologicheskie problemi osnovi teorii prinyatiya resheniy [Methodological problems of the foundations of the theory of decision-making]. Informaciya i upravlenie. Ìoskva: Nauka.

10. Ryabova M.E. (2008) Inoyazichie kak factor razvitiya lichnosti i obschestva [Different language as a factor of the individual and the society development]. Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 2, pp. 167–177.

11. Ryabova M.E. (2010) Multilingvizm kak preodolenie uslozhneniya mira [Multilinguism as overcoming the complexity of the world]. Voprosi fi losofi i, no. 7, pp. 149–152.

12. Sorina G.V. (2009) Prinyatie resheniy kak intellektualnaya deyatel’nost’ [Decision making as an intellectual activity]. Ìoskva: Kanon+; Reabilitaciya.

13. Styopin V.S. (2013) Perelom v civilizacionnom razvitii. Tochki rosta novikh cennostey [The turning point in the development of civilization. New values growing points]. Globalnoe buduschee 2045. Konvergentnie tekhnologii (NBIKS) i transgumanisticheskaya evoluciya. Ìoskva: OOO “Izd-vo MBA”.

14. Yudin B.G. (2013) Transgumanizm – nashe buduschee? [Transhumanism is our future?]. Chelovek, no. 4, pp. 5–15.

15. Zadeh L.A. (1980) Razmitie mnozhestva i ikh primenenie v raspoznovanii obrazov i klaster-analize [Fuzzy sets and their application in the pattern recognition and the cluster analysis]. Klassifi kaciya i klaster. Ìoskva: Mir.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up