The Phenomenon of Modernization: a Civilizational Dimension The article 1. Interaction Between Civilizations: Presupposition, Condition and Historical Content of the Process of Modernization

 
PIIS086904990011584-4-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Latin America (ILA RAN)
Address: 21/10, B. Ordynka, Moscow, 115035, Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 6
Pages58-72
Abstract

The rticle examines the phenomenon of moderzation in the context of civilizational approach. The author emphasizes the need to overcome the Eurocentric interpretation of modernization and insists on its understanding as a process of Eurocentric interpretation of medernization and insists on its understanding as a process of Intercivilizational Interaction. It is shown that variety and intensity of contacts between the different cultural traditions acts as the premise of the Europe “modern-era” beginning as well as the condition of the modernization process in the “non-Western” world. The main conclusion: the modernization – is the process of creating a new social quality. Its apperance assumes that in the cource of the diverse civilization features interaction there apperas something new, something different for a number of basic parameters of the original participants of interaction.

Keywordsmodernization, values of modernization, modern-design, interaction between civilizations, civilizational identity, identifi cation strategy, subecumenes, “borderline” civilizations
Received15.09.2020
Publication date17.12.2015
Number of characters797
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 119

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Afanasin E.V. (2002) Antichnyj gnosticizm. Fragmenty i svidetel’stvà [Ancient Gnosticism. Fragments and Testimonies]. St. Petersburg: Oleg Abyshko.

2. Alternative Modernities (2001) Durham (NC): Duke Univ. Press.

3. Arnason J.P. (2003) Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden–Boston: Brill.

4. Bekarev A.M. (2010) Mul’tikul’turnye kprni rossijskoj identichnosti [Multicultural Roots of Russian Identity]. Voprosy social’noj teorii: Nauchnyj al’manah [Questions of Social Theory: Scientifi c Almanac], vol. IV. Moscow: Associaciya “Mezhdisciplinarnoe obshchestvo social’noj teorii”.

5. Bentley J.H. (2006) Globalizing History and Historicizing Globalization. Globalization and Global History. London–New York: Routledge, pp. 18–31.

6. Bessoznatel'noe: Priroda. Funkcii. Metody issledovaniya. [The Unconscious: Nature. Function. Research methods]. V 4 t. T. 4 (1985). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.

7. Chakrabarty D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

8. Chelovek v poiskah identichnosti (2010) [The man in Search of your Identity (2010)]. Voprosy social'noj teorii. Nauchnyj al'manah [Voprosy social'noj teorii: Nauchnyj al'manah], vol. IV. Moscow: Associaciya “Mezhdisciplinarnoe obshchestvo social'noj teorii”.

9. Childe G.B. (1952) U istokov evropejskoj civilizacii [Dawn of European Civilization]. Moscow: Izdat-vo Inostrannoj literatury.

10. Chirot D. (2001) A Clash of Civilizations or of Paradigms? Theorizing Progress and Social

11. Change. International Sociology, vol.16, no. 3, pp. 341–360.

12. Clark G. (2007) A Farewell to Alms. A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

13. Daniel G.E. (1985) The Megalith Builders of Western Europe. London: Hutchinson.

14. Dendney D., Ikenberry G.J. (2009) The Myth of the Autocratic Revival: Why Liberal Democracy Will Prevail. Foreign Affairs, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 93.

15. Duka O.G. (2009) Teoriya smyslovogo polya [The Theory of Semantic Field]. Omsk. Izd-vo OmGPU.

16. Dunne T. (2010) The Liberal Order and the Modern Project. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 535–543.

17. Eisenstadt S.N. (2001) The Civilizational Dimension of Modernity. International Sociology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 320–340.

18. Eisenstadt S.N. (1987) European Civilization in Comparative Perspective: a Study in the Relations between Culture and Social Structure. Oslo: Norwegian Univ. Press.

19. Eisenstadt S.N. (2006) Multiple Moderne im Zeitalter der Globalisiering. Die Vielfalt und Einheit der Moderne: Kultur und Strukturvergleichende Analysen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, S. 37–62.

20. Eisenstadt S.N. (2000) Die Viefalt der Moderne. Weilerswist: elbruck.

21. Ferguson N. (2014) Civilizaciya: Chem Zapad otlichaetsya ot ostal'nogo mira [Civilization: the West and the Rest]. Moscow: AST: CORPUS.

22. Flynn D.O., Giraldez A. (2006) Globalization began in 1571. Globalization and Global History. London–New York: Routledge, pp. 232–247.

23. Gimbutas M. (1974) The Gods and Goddesses of Old Europe: 7000–3500 BC. Myths, Legends and Cult Images. Berkeley–Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.

24. Gimbutas M. (2006) Civilizaciya Velikoj Bogini: Mir Drevnej Evropy [Civilization of the Great Goddess: the World of Ancient Europe]. Moscow: ROSSPEN.

25. Goldstone J.A. (1998) Initial Conditions, General Laws, Path Dependence and Explanation in Historical Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 829–845.

26. Grimal P. (2008) Civilizaciya Drevnego Rima [Civilization of Ancient Rome]. Ekaterininburg: U-Faktoriya; Moscow: AST Moskva.

27. Hawkins G.S. (1977) Krome Stounhendzha [Beyond Stonehenge]. Moscow: Mir.

28. Hawkins G.S., White J.B. (1984) Razgadka tajny Stounhendzha. [Stonehenge Decoded]. Moscow: Mir.

29. Hobson J.M. (2004) The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

30. Hong Zh. (2010) The World Implications of the “Chinese Road” in the Context of Globalization. Social Sciences in China, no. 2, pp. 5–20.

31. Evoljuciya vostochnyh obshhestv: Sintz tradicionnogo i sovremennogo (1984) [Evolution of Eastern Societies: Synthesis of Traditional and Contemporary]. Moscow: Nauka.

32. Knobl W. (2010) Path Dependency and Civilizational Analysis: Methodological Challenges and Theoretical Tasks. European Journal of Social Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 83–97.

33. Kuzyk B.N., Titarenko M.L. (2006) Kitaj–Rossiya 2050: strategiya sorazvitiya [China–Russia 2050: Strategy of Co-development]. Moscow: Institut ehkonomicheskih strategij.

34. Lapteva L.P. (1990) Gusitskoe dvizhenie v Chekhii v XV v. [Hussite movement in the Czech Republic in the XV century]. Moscow. Izd-vo MGU.

35. Levi-Strauss C. (1971) Dinamique culturelle et valeurs. Approaches de la science du developpement socio-economique. Paris. UNESCO.

36. Lubker F. (2005) Illyustrirovannyj slovar’ antichnosti [Illustrated Dictionary of Antiquity]. Moscow: Izd-vo EHKSMO.

37. Mahoney J. (2000). Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory & Society, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 507–518.

38. Meyer M.S. (2002) Dolgij “serebryanyj” vek Vostoka [Long “Silver” Age of the East]. Vostok–Zapad–Rossiya. Moscow: Progress-Tradizia, pp. 145–160.

39. Mongait A.L. (1973–1974) Arheologiya Zapadnoj Evropy [Archaeology of Western Europe]. Moscow: Nauka.

40. Mouzelis N. (1999) Modernity: a Non-European Conceptualization. British Journal of Sociology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 153.

41. Nemirovsky A.I., Harsekin A.I. (1969) Ehtruski. Vvedenie v ehtruskologiyu [The Etruscans, Introduction to Etruscology]. Voronezh: Izd-vo Voronezhskogo universiteta.

42. Neumann I. (2004) Ispol’zovanie “Drugogo”: obrazy Vostoka v formirovanii evropejskih identichnostej [Uses of the “Other”: the East in the European Identity Formation]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo.

43. Nielsen D.A. (2001). Rationalization, Transformations of Consciousness and Intercivilizational Encounters: Refl ections on Benjamin Nelson’s Sociology of Civilizations. International Sociology, vol. 16. no. 3, pp. 406–420.

44. Obzornyj doklad o modernizacii v mire i Kitae (2011) [A Survey Report on the Modernization of the World and China]. Moscow: Ves' mir.

45. Pomeranz G.S. (1995) Teoriya subehkumen i problema svoeobraziya stykovyh kul'tur [The Theory of Subecumenes and the Problem of Peculiarity of Joint Cultures]. Vyhod iz transa, Moscow: Jurist, pp. 205–227.

46. Pomeranz G. (2000) The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

47. Randeria S. (1999) Jenseits von Soziologie und soziokultureller Anthropologie: Zur Ortsbestimmung der nichtwestlichen Welt in einer zukunftigen Sozial theorie. Ortsbestimmungen der Soziologie: Wie die kommende Generation Gesellschafts wissenschaften betreiben will. Baden-Baden: Nomos, S. 41–50.

48. Rashkovsky E.B. (1976) Vostokovednaya problematika v kul'turno-istoricheskoj koncepcii Toynbee A.J. [Oriental Problems in Cultural-historical Theory of Toynbee A.J.] Moscow: Nauka.

49. Rokkan S. (1975) Dimensions of State Formation and Nation-Building: a Possible Paradigm for Research on Variations in Europe. The Formation of National States in Europe. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press, pp. 562–600.

50. Said E.W. (2006) Orientalizm. Zapadnye koncepcii Vostoka [Orientalism. Western Conceptions of the Orient]. St.-Petersburg: Russkij mir.

51. Schwinn T. (2009) Multiple Modernities: Konkurrierende Thesen und offene Fragen: Ein Literaturbericht in konstruktiver Absicht. Zeitschrift fur Soziologie. Jg. 38. H. 6, S. 454–476.

52. Shemyakin J.G. (2001a) Evropa i Latinskaya Amerika: Vzaimodejstvie civilizacij v kontekste vsemirnoj istorii [Europe and Latin America: Interaction of Civilizations in the Context of World History]. Moscow: Nauka.

53. Shemyakin J.G. (2001b) Istoriya mirovyh civilizacij. XX v. [The History of World Civilizations. XX Century]. Moscow: APKYPRO.

54. Shemyakin J.G. (2014) K voprosu o metodologii civilizacionnyh issledovanij [On the Question of Methodology of Civilizational Studies]. Civilizacii. T. 9. Civilizaciya kak ideya i issledovatel'skaya praktika. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 27–57.

55. Shestov L. (1993) Afi ny i Ierusalim: Opyt religioznoj fi losofi i [Athens and Jerusalem: the Experience of Religious Philosophy]. Shestov Sochineniya v 2 t. [Works in 2 volumes]. T. 1. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 313–664.

56. Shtaerman E.M. (1992) Problema rimskoj civilizacii [The Problem of Roman Civilization]. Civilizacii, vyp. 1. Moscow: Nauka, pp. 88–119.

57. Sledzevsky I.V. (2010) Dialog civilizacii kak smyslovoe pole mirovoj politiki [Dialogue of Civilizations as a Semantic Field of World Policy]. Dialog v policentrichnom mire: fi losofsko-kul'turnye, istoricheskie, politicheskie i kommunikativnye problem. Moscow: IAF RAN, pp. 136–174.

58. Sokuler Z.A. (2003) Stolknovenie ili dialog civilizacij? Sovremennye civilizacionnye issledovaniya. Referativnyj obzor [The Clash or Dialogue of Civilizations? Modern Civilizational Studies. Patent Review]. Rossiya i sovremennyj mir, no. 3 (40), pp. 158–220.

59. Spohn W. (2010) Europaische multiple Modernitat als interzivilisatorische Konstellation: Zur Transformation Europas durch europaische Integration und Erweiterung in einer sich globalisierende Welt. Berliner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie. Jg. 20. H. 1. S. 5–22.

60. Toporov V.N. (2007) Balkanskij makrotekst i drevnebalkanskaya neo-ehneoliticheskaya civilizaciya (obshhij vzglyad) [The Balkanian Macrotext and Ancient Balkanian Neo-Chalcolithic Civilization (General View)]. Vostok i Zapad v balkanskoj kartine mira. Moscow: “Indrik”, pp. 10–25.

61. Toynbee A.J. (1991) Postizhenie istorii [A Study of History]. Moscow: Progress.

62. Trofimova M.K. (1979) Istoriko-fi losofskie voprosy gnosticizma [Historical and Philosophical Questions of Gnosticism]. Moscow: Nauka.

63. Wagner P. (2010) Multiple Trajectories of Modernity: Why Social Theory Needs Historical Sociology. Thesis Eleven, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 53–60.

64. Wittrok B. (2000) Modernity: One, None or Many? European Origins and Modernity as a Global Condition. Daedalus, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 54–56.

65. Wolff L. (2003) Izobretaya Vostochnuyu Evropu: Karta civilizacii v soznanii ehponi Prosveshcheniya [Inventing Eastern Europe: the Map of Civilization on the Mind of the Enlightenment]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.

66. Zubov A.B. (1997) O prirode russkoj civilizacii [On the Nature of Russian Civilization]. Rubezhi, no. 8–9, pp. 101–114.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up