“Actor-Network-Theory” of B. Latour and “Culture Factor” in the Analysis of Economic Processes

 
PIIS086904990011531-6-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Chief Research Fellow, Professor
Affiliation:
Institute of economics of the Russian Academy of sciences
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Address: 32, Nachimovsky av., Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 3
Pages157-167
Abstract

B. Latour distinguishes between “sociology of social” and “sociology of associations”. Similarly, we can speak of “economic economy” (economic theory) and the economy of cities, regions, countries, sectors. Constructivism is intended to include a network of researchers in the relationships with other actors and actants, the reconstruction of this situation. In contrast to this neo-Kantian scheme in the traditional discourse of the behavior of the subject assumes relatively independent in relation to the object. The “culture man” model can significantly contradict the “economic man”. Culture suggests that individuals are included in a certain context, politics, religion, technology, landscape. However, the attempt to view culture as a purely exogenous-determining factor of economic behavior is doomed to failure. Culture – part of the knowing subject, and the researcher should revise the base of their own thinking to understand the impact of culture on others. Refusal of such review often leads to errors.

Keywordsconstructivism, institutions, economic man, culture
Received14.09.2020
Publication date17.06.2017
Number of characters1080
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 147

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Auzan A. A. (2006) Pereuchrezhdenie gosudarstva: obshhestvennyj dogovor. [Being re-state: the social contract]. Moscow: Evropa.

2. Jacobs J. (2006) Zakat Ameriki. Vperedi Srednevekov’e. [Dark Age Ahead]. Moscow: Evropa.

3. Gladwell M. (2010) Genii i autsajdery: Pochemu odnim vsjo, a drugim nichego? [Outliers. The Story of Success]. Moscow: Junajted Press.

4. The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010 (published by the World Economic Forum within the framework of the Global Competitiveness Network). World Economic Forum. Geneva. 2.

5. Gurevich A. (2014) Istoricheskij sintez i Shkola “Annalov” [Historical synthesis and School “Annals”]. Moscow; St.-Petersburg: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ; Universitetskaja kniga.

6. Hofstede G. (1991) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

7. Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2006) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.

8. Kuzminov Y., Radaev V., Yakovlev A.A., Yasin E.G. (2005) Instituty: Ot zaimstvovanija k vyrashchivaniju. Opyt rossijskikh reform i vozmozhnoe kul’tivirovanie institucional’nykh izmenenij [Institutions: From adoption to grow. Åxperience of Russian reforms and the possible cultivation of institutional changes]. Moscow: HSE (https://www.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/document/70846461).

9. Latour B. (2014) Peresborka social’nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuju teoriju [Reassembling The Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory]. Moscow: ID HSE.

10. Luman N. (2004) Obshhestvo kak social’naja sistema [Society as a Social System]. Moscow: Logos.

11. McCloskey D. (2015) Ritorika ekonomicheskoj nauki [The Rhetoric of Economics]. Moscow, St.-Petersburg: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara, Izdatelstvo Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, Fakul’tet svobodnyh iskusstv i nauk SPbGU.

12. Ortega y Gasset J. (2016) Vosstanie mass [Rise of the Masses]. Moscow: AST.

13. Rodrik D. (2016) Ekonomika reshaet: sila i slabost’ “mrachnoj nauki” [Economics Rules. The Right and Wrongs of the Dismal Science]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Instituta Gajdara.

14. Tambovtsev V.L. (2016) Mif o “kul’turnom kode” v nauchnykh issledovanijakh. Nauchnyj doklad [The myth of the “cultural code” in scientific research. Scientific report]. Moscow: IE RAN.

15. Thurow L. (1999) Budushhee kapitalizma. Kak segodnjashnie jekonomicheskie sily formirujut zavtrashnij den’ [The Future of Capitalism. How Today?s Economic Forces Shape Tomorrow?s World]. Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy hronograf.

16. Vakhshtajn V. (2011) Sociologija povsednevnosti i teorija frejmov [Sociology of everyday life and the theory of frames]. St.-Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Evropejskogo universiteta v SPb.

17. Veblen T. (2006) Pochemu ekonomicheskaja nauka ne yavlyaetsya evoljucionnoy disciplinoy? [Why is Economics not an Evolutionary Sciences?]. Istoki: iz opyta izuchenija ekonomiki kak struktury i processa [Roots: From the Studying the Economy as a Structure and Process]. Moscow: ID HSE.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up