All
 
|
 
 


Human sciences as a vocation and a profession
 
PIIS086904990011446-2-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Ilya Dementev 
Occupation: Associate Professor
Affiliation: Institute for Humanities, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Address: A. Nevsky street 14, 236041 Kaliningrad
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 1
Pages158-176
Abstract

The paper analyses the content of the collective monograph ‘Human Sciences. The history of Disciplines’ (2015) in terms of contemporary approaches to the history of sciences. The article contains main theses of the authors of the monograph including interpretation of prehistory of humanitarian epistemology in Europe and the history of discipline building in sociohumanitarian knowledge in 18–21 centuries. The author gives characteristic to genealogy of the concept ‘human sciences’ (‘humanities’) and marks culturally determined differences in the classification of human and social sciences. The paper redefines the perspectives of further elaboration of the topic of the monograph in context of the analysis of such processes as globalisation, digitalisation and demodernisation of human sciences.

KeywordsHistory of Knowledge, Humanities, Human Sciences, Social Sciences
Received11.09.2020
Publication date29.01.2018
Number of characters752
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 417

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Backhouse R.E., Fontaine Ph. (2010) Introduction. The History of the Social Sciences since 1945. Ed. by R.E. Backhouse, Ph. Fontaine. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 1–15.
2. Beer D. (2008) Renovating Russia. The Human Sciences and the Fate of Liberal Modernity, 1880–1930. Ithaca; London: Cornell Univ. Press.
3. Berry D.M. (2012) Introduction: Understanding the Digital Humanities. Understanding Digital Humanities. Ed. by D.M. Berry. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–20.
4. Bod R. (2013) A New History of the Humanities. The Search for Principles and Patterns from Antiquity to the Present. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
5. Boundaries of History (2015) Ed. by J.E. Myhre. Oslo: Scandinavian academic press.
6. Braudel F. (1977) Ecrits sur l’histoire. Paris: Flammarion.
7. The Cambridge History of Science (2003). Vol. 7: The Modern Social Sciences. Ed. by Th.M. Porter, D. Ross. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
8. Chartier R. (2016) Sciences et savoirs. Annales HSS, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 451–464.
9. Chiang H. (2015) Ordering the Social: History of the Human Sciences in Modern China. History of Science, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 4–8.
10. The Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science (2011) Ed. by S. French, J. Saatsi. London; New York: Continuum.
11. Dictionnaire historique de la langue francaise (2000) Sous la dir. A. Rey. Vol. 3. Paris: Robert.
12. Die Geisteswissenschaften im europaischen Diskurs (2010) Bd. 2: Osteuropa. Hrsg. D. Ginev. Innsbruck; Wien; Bozen: Studienverlag.
13. Gilli M. (2007) Die Geisteswissenschaften in Frankreich. Die Geisteswissenschaften im europaischen Diskurs. Hrsg. H. Reinalter. Bd. 1: West- und Zentraleuropa. Innsbruck; Wien; Bozen: Studienverlag, S. 201–217.
14. Habermas J. (1968) Erkenntnis und Interesse. Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp.
15. Harman G. (2016) Demodernizing the Humanities with Latour. New literary history, vol. 47, no. 2–3, pp. 249–274.
16. Histories of Scientific Observation (2011) Ed. by L. Daston, E. Lunbeck. Chicago; London: The Univ. of Chicago Press.
17. Das Interesse der Vernunft (2000) Ruckbliche auf das Werk von Jurgen Habermas seit “Erkenntnis und Interesse”. Hrsg. S. Muller-Doohm. Frankfurt a/M: Suhrkamp.
18. Isaac J. (2007) The Human Sciences in Cold War America. Historical Journal, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 725–746.
19. Johnson Ch. (2003) Claude Levi-Strauss. Formative years. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
20. Kjorup S. (2001) Humanities. Geisteswissenschaften. Sciences humaines. Eine Einfuhrung. Stuttgart; Weimar: J.B. Metzler.
21. Klein L.S. (2017) Muki nauki. Ucheny i vlast’, ucheny i den’gi, ucheny i moral’ [Sufferings of the Science. Scholar and Power, Scholar and Money, Scholar and Moral]. Moscow: Novoe lieraturnoe obozrenie.
22. Latour B. (2012) Enquete sur les modes d’existence. Une anthropologie des Modernes. Paris: La Decouverte.
23. Latour B. (2006) Kogda veshchi dayut otpor: vozmozhny vklad “issledovaniy nauku” v obschestvennye nauki [When Things Strike Back: a Possible Contribution of 'Science Studies' to the Social Sciences]. Sociologiya veshchey [Sociology of things]. Ed. by V. Vakhstain. Moscow: Territoria budushchego, pp. 342–362.
24. Leventhal R.S (1994) The Disciplines of Interpretation. Lessing, Herder, Schlegel and Hermeneutics in Germany 1750–1800. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter.
25. Levi-Strauss C. (1973) Anthropologie structurale deux. Paris: Plon.
26. Levi-Strauss C. (1950) Preface. Berndt C.H. Women’s changing ceremonies in Northern Australia. Paris: Hermann.
27. Levi-Strauss C. (2001) Strukturnaya antropologiya [Structural Anthropology]. Moscow: Exmo-press.
28. Lloyd G.E.R. (2009) Discipline in the Making. Cross-cultural Perspectives on Elites, Learning, and Innovation. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
29. Nauki o cheloveke: Istoriya disciplin (2015) [Human Sciences: the History of Disciplines]. Ed. by A.N. Dmitriev, I.M. Savelieva. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Pulblishers.
30. A New Companion to Digital Humanities (2016) Ed. by S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, J. Unsworth. [Chichester]: Wiley Blackwell.
31. Nkulu Kamamba O. (2016) Les sciences humaines sont-elles humaines? De la posture semantique et epistemologique a la posture ethique. Paris: L’Harmattan.
32. Osterhammel J. (2012) Globale Asymmetrien in den Geisteswissenschaften: Das Beispiel der Geschichte. Die Zukunft der Geisteswissenschaften in einer multipolaren Welt. Hrsg. J. Mittelstrass, U. Rudiger. Konstanz: UVK, S. 13–26.
33. Renaudo G. (2016) Des sciences pour nous comprendre. Verite et realisme en sciences humaines. Toulouse: Presses universitaires du Midi.
34. Ricoeur P. (1993) Morale, ethique et politique. Pouvoirs, no. 65, pp. 5–17.
35. Romano A. (2015) Fabriquer l’histoire des sciences modernes. Reflexions sur une discipline a l’ere de la mondialisation. Annales HSS, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 381–408.
36. Shaw D.G. (2013) A Way with Animals. History and Theory, no. 52, pp. 1–12.
37. Stunkel K.R. (2011) Fifty Key Works of History and Historiography. London; New York: Routledge.
38. Turner J. (2014) Philology: the Forgotten Origins of the Modern Humanities. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
39. Vergleich und Transfer. Komparatistik in den Sozial-, Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften (2003) Hrsg. H. Kaelble, J. Schriewer. Frankfurt a/M.: Campus.
40. Walker B.L. (2013) Animals and the Intimacy of History. History and Theory, no. 52, pp. 45–67.
41. Weber M. (1963) Le savant et le politique [1919]. Paris: Union Generale d’Editions.
42. Weber M. (1998) Nauka jako zawod i powolanie. Weber M. Polityka jako zawod i powolanie. Krakow: Znak, s. 111–140.
43. Weber M. (1990) Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya [Science as a vocation]. Weber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Selected works]. Ìoscow: Progress, pp. 707–735.
44. Weber M., Kalinowski I. (2005) La science, profession et vocation. Suivi de ?Lecons weberiennes sur la science & la propagande?. Paris: Agone.
45. Zwischen artes liberales und artes digitales (2016) Beitrage zur traditionellen und digitalen Geisteswissenschaft. Festschrift gewidmet Michael Trauth zum 65. Geburtstag am 10. Mai 2015. Hrsg. A. Geissler, M. Schneider. Marburg: Tectum.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up