Nation-state and empire: who supports various models of state development in Ukraine and Russia?

 
PIIS086904990011418-1-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor
Affiliation:
Memorial University of Newfoundland (Canada)
TSEMI RAS (Moscow)
Address: Sociology Department Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, NLA1С SS7 Canada
Journal nameObshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost
EditionIssue 2
Pages140-159
Abstract

The article discusses four scenarios of state building in Ukraine and Russia: civic and ethnic models of nation-state, liberal and non-liberal empires. Secondary data – results of two mass surveys – inform the analysis. The proposed study highlights social particularities of supporters of each model. Special attention is paid to nationalism as a potential driving force of democratization in these two counties.

Keywordsempire, nation-state, nationalism, Ukraine, Russia
Received10.09.2020
Publication date19.04.2018
Number of characters436
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 107

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Baranovsky V., Mateiko A. (2016) Responsibility to Protect: Russia’s Approaches. The International Spectator: Italian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 51, issue 2, pp. 49–69.

2. Boycko M., Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1995) Privatizing Russia. Cambridge (MA) and London: The MIT Press.

3. Brubaker R. (1996) Nationalism reframed: nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

4. Gaydar E.T. (2006) Gibel’ imperii: uroki dlya sovremennoy Rossii [The demise of the empire: lessons for modern Russia]. Moscow: ROSSPEN.

5. Gerasimenko D.S. (2016) Doktrina R2P v mizhderzhavnih vidnosinah: vid podiy v Gruzi do Krimu [The doctrine of “R2P” in the foreign wings: from the west to Georgia to the Crima]. Molodiy vcheniy, no. 2(29), pp. 188–193.

6. Granin YU.D. (2011) Stanet li Rossiya nacionalnim gosudarstvom? [Will Russia become a “national state”?]. Voprosi filosofii, no. 1, pp. 15–27.

7. Harasymiw B. (2002) Post-Communist Ukraine. Edmonton and Toronto: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press.

8. Korostelina K.V. (2014) Constructing the narratives of identity and power: Self-imagination in a young Ukrainian nation. Lanham (MA): Lexington.

9. Kostomarov N. (1861) Dve russkie narodnosti [Two Russian nationalities]. Osnova, no. 3, pp. 33–80.

10. Kuzio T. (1998) Ukraine: State and Nation Building. London and New York: Routledge.

11. Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? (1990) Ed. by Williamson J. Washington: Institute for International Economics.

12. McCormick J.P. (2008) Machiavellian Democracy: Controlling Elites with Ferocious Populism. American Political Science Review, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 297–313.

13. Merton R.K. (1995) The Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect. Social Forces, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 379–424.

14. Mezhuev V.M. (1992) Ideya nacionalnogo gosudarstva v istoricheskoy perspektive [The Idea of the National State in Historical Perspective]. POLIS, no. 5–6, pp. 10–16.

15. Oleynik A.N. (2012) Kto eti muzhchini i zhenschini na fotografii? Kontent-analiz fotografiy massovih protestov [Who are these men and women in the photo? Content analysis of photos of mass protests]. Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya: Dannie. Analiz. Diskussii, no. 2, pp. 87–102.

16. Oleynik A.N.(2015) Konflikt formalnih institutov i chelovecheskogo kak istochnik politicheskogo cinizma [Conflict of formal institutions and “human” as a source of political cynicism]. Politicheskaya konceptologiya: Zhurnal metadisciplinarnih issledovaniy, no. 2, pp. 178–190.

17. Pain E., Prostakov S. (2016) Entoni Smit (1939–2016) i ego nauchnoe zaveschanie. Nekrolog [Anthony Smith (1939–2016) and his scientific testament. Obituary]. Sociologicheskoe obozrenie, no. 15(3), pp. 255–260.

18. Pain E., Fedyunin S. (2017) O metodologicheskoy perezagruzke teorii nacii [On the methodological reset of the theory of the nation]. Gefter.Ru. 2017 (http://gefter.ru/archive/22113).

19. Pastuhov V.B. (2000) Nacionalniy i gosudarstvenniy interesi Rossii: igra slov ili igra v slova? [National and State Interests of Russia: Playing Words or Playing Words?]. POLIS, no. 1, pp. 95–96.

20. Peregudov S.P. (2011) Nacionalno-gosudarstvennaya identichnost i problemi konsolidacii rossiyskogo gosudarstva [National-State Identity and the Problems of the Consolidation of the Russian State]. POLIS, no. 3, pp. 141–163.

21. Reformaciya: Uspih vropi i shans dlya Ukrani (2017) [Reformation: success for Europe and a chance for Ukraine]. Za redakciyu Sheremeti R.M., Romanenko O. Kiv: Sammit-Knig.

22. Rustow D.A. (1970) Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. Comparative Politics, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 337–363.

23. Salnikov V.P., Romanovskaya V.B., Salnikov M.V., Romanovskaya L.A. (2015) Russkiy povorot v politiko-pravovom diskurse [“The Russian turn” in the political and legal discourse]. Uchenie zapiski yuridicheskogo fakulteta Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta, no. 38(48), pp. 192–198.

24. Sloterdayk P. (2009) Kritika cinicheskogo razuma [Criticism of Cynical Reason]. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya, Moscow: ACT.

25. Smith A.D. (1991) National Identity. London: Penguin Books.

26. Smith A.D. (2002) When is a Nation? Geopolitics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 5–32.

27. Smith A.D. (2004) The Antiquity of Nations. Cambridge: Polity.

28. Suslov M. (2012) Geographical Metanarratives in Russia and the European East: Contemporary Pan-Slavism. Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 53, no. 5. pp. 575–595.

29. Tishkov V.A. (2013) Rossiyskiy narod: istoriya i smisl nacionalnogo samosoznaniya [The Russian people: the history and meaning of national identity]. Moscow: Nauka.

30. Veblen T. (1939) Imperial Germany and Industrial Revolution. New York: The Viking Press.

31. Warner R.M. (2013) Applied Statistics: From Bivariate to Multivariate Techniques. Los Angeles: Sage.

32. Yakovenko I.G. (1996) Ot imperii k nacionalnomu gosudarstvu (Popitka konceptualizacii processa) [From the Empire to the National State (An attempt to conceptualize the process)]. POLIS, no. 6, pp. 117–128.

33. Yan E. (2000) Gosudarstvennoe i etnicheskoe ponimanie nacii: protivorechiya i shodstvo [The State and Ethnic Understanding of the Nation: Contradictions and Similarities]. POLIS, no. 1, pp. 114–123.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up