The Perception Of Inequality By The Population And Its Objective Indicators In The Countries Of The World: Is There A Relationship Between The Two?

 
PIIS020736760025990-8-1
DOI10.31857/S020736760025990-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
 
Affiliation: Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Address: Moscow, Russia
Journal nameObshchestvo i ekonomika
EditionIssue 6
Pages78-89
Abstract

According to some empirical studies, it is the subjective perception of inequality, rather than its actual depth in the country, that is more strongly correlated with people's desire to reduce inequality. Considering perceived inequality it possible to take into account the criticism of existing approaches to the assessment of actual inequality and make the discussion about the problems of inequality productive. In this regard, the study of the relationship between objective inequality and its subjective perception seems to be promising. In this article, based on the data of the European Social Survey, a comparative analysis of the attitude of Russians to inequality and its relationship with objective indicators of inequality is carried out. Unlike previous studies, the article includes the analysis of other indicators that reflect various aspects of inequality, in addition to the Gini coefficient and the decile ratio.

Keywordsinequality, attitudes to inequality, population, Gini coefficient, decile ratio, Palm coefficient
Received28.06.2023
Publication date28.06.2023
Number of characters16588
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 116

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bussolo M., Torre I., Ferrer-i-Carbonell A. I Perceive Therefore I Demand: the Formation of Inequality Perceptions and Demand for Redistribution // World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. 2019. No. 8926.

2. Bussolo M., Peragine V., Sundaram R. Toward a New Social Contract: Taking on Distributional Tensions in Europe and Central Asia. Europe and Central Asia Studies; Washington, DC: World Bank. 2018. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30393

3. Engelhardt C., Wagener A. Biased Perceptions of Income Inequality and Redistribution. CESifo Working Paper Series. 2014. No. 4838. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2463129

4. Fernández-Albertos J., Kuo A. Income Perception, Information, and Progressive Taxation: Evidence from a Survey Experiment. Political Science Research and Methods. 2018. No. 6(1). P. 83-110. URL: doi:10.1017/psrm.2015.73

5. Gimpelson V.E., Treisman D. Misperceiving Inequality. Economics and Politics. 2018. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 27-54.

6. Norton M.I., Ariely D. Building a Better America – One Wealth Quintile at a Time. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2011. No. 6(1). P. 9-12. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524

7. Kapelyushnikov R.I. Neravenstvo: kak ne primitivizirovat' problemu // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2017. № 4. S. 117-139.

8. Kapelyushnikov R.I. Ehkonomicheskoe neravenstvo – vselenskoe zlo? // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2019. № 4. C. 91-106.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up