On The Disadvantages Of GDP As A Universal Macroeconomic Indicator

 
PIIS020736760024281-8-1
DOI10.31857/S020736760024281-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Chief Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: 32, Nakhimovskii Prosp., Moscow, 117218, Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvo i ekonomika
EditionIssue 2
Pages61-79
Abstract

The article explains the shortcomings of GDP as a macroeconomic indicator, which do not allow it to accurately represent the real state of the economy: GDP is based not on the quantity of the goods produced, but on the amount of human labor spent in the country; it is calculated in monetary form on the ba-sis of market prices and tariffs; it distorts cross-country comparisons; it takes into account productive and unproductive, and even useless and destructive labor on an equal basis. The author suggests upgrading the economic indica-tors used in cross-country comparisons and supplementing the GDP with the "gross commodity product" indicator, which reflects the state of only the real sector of the economy, including manufacturing, transportation, R&D and marketing segments

Keywordsgross domestic product, calculation shortcomings, cross-country comparisons, improvement opportunities, gross commodity product
Received14.03.2023
Publication date14.03.2023
Number of characters43998
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 314

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Stiglitz J., Sen A., Fitussi G.-P. Mis-measuring our lives. Why GDP doesn’t add up? // New-York. The New Press. 2010. 176 p.

2. Gal'chenko Andrej, Murzak Nataliya, Tegin Vladislav. O vozmozhnosti korrektnogo rejtingovogo sravneniya proizvoditel'nosti truda mezhdu stranami OEhSR // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2020. № 8. S. 27-42.

3. Sukharev Oleg. Tekhnologicheskaya industrializatsiya: sovremennost' i novye voz-mozhnosti // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2020. № 7. S. 32-51.

4. Gurov I.N., Kuznetsova E.Yu. Zavisimost' mezhdu urovnem razvitiya strany i vliya-niem struktury bankovskogo kreditovaniya na ehkonomicheskij rost // Voprosy ehkonomi-ki. 2021. № 10. S. 51-70.

5. Marichev S.G. Kolichestvennaya otsenka besplatnykh tsifrovykh blag v sostave VVP // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2022. № 1. S. 126-146.

6. Babaev V.D., Dubrovskij S.P. Ehkonomicheskij rost: rasshirennaya traktovka. Kache-stvo ehkonomicheskogo rosta // Ehkonomika obrazovaniya. 2015. № 1. S. 33-38.

7. Neverov D. Sotsial'nye rify ehkonomicheskogo rosta // Mir peremen. 2022. № 1. S. 75-87.

8. Rikardo D. Nachala politicheskoj ehkonomii i nalogovogo oblozheniya // M.: Ehksmo. 2008. S. 85

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up