Monetary Policy For Economic Growth In Russia: Accumulative Slowing Effect

The study is devoted to assessing the impact of monetary policy on economic growth in Russia in 2000-2020, with a separate analysis of the main directions of monetary policy in 2022, formulated with a perspective up to 2025. The purpose is to demonstrate the inhibitory effect of monetary policy, as well as to identify the conceptual contradictions embedded in the main legal documents. The methodology is based on the theory of economic growth and economic policy, empirical-statistical and regression analysis. The application of the methodology allows us to come to the conclusion that over the period under study, monetary policy aimed at reducing inflation, while achieving this goal, in general, contributed to the slowdown of economic growth in Russia, in no way ensuring balanced and sustainable growth. Thus, relatively low price dynamics was not a condition for sustainable growth. Monetary policy in Russia in 2000-2022 was characterized by a negative effect, that is, the elimination of the sensitivity of the main macroeconomic development goals to monetary policy instruments. This blocked new growth factors. The way out is to change the basic principles and postulates of monetary policy in Russia.

Keywords

economic growth, monetary policy, key interest rate, inflation, GDP growth rate, money supply, targeting, main directions of monetary policy, accumulative effect

Received

25.01.2023

Publication date

26.01.2023

Number of characters

48692

Cite

GOST	Suharev O. Monetary Policy For Economic Growth In Russia: Accumulative Slowing Effect // Obshchestvo i ekonomika – 2023. – Issue 1 C. 5-26 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://oie.jes.su/S020736760023986-3-1 (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S020736760023986-3
MLA	Suharev, Oleg S "Monetary Policy For Economic Growth In Russia: Accumulative Slowing Effect." Obshchestvo i ekonomika 1 (2023):5-26. DOI: 10.31857/S020736760023986-3
APA	Suharev O. (2023). Monetary Policy For Economic Growth In Russia: Accumulative Slowing Effect. Obshchestvo i ekonomika (1), pp.5-26 DOI: 10.31857/S020736760023986-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 199

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Glaz'ev S.Yu. Bitva za liderstvo v XXI veke. Rossiya, SShA, Kitaj. Sem' variantov blizhajshego buduschego // M.: Knizhnyj mir. 2017. -352 s.

2. Glaz'ev S.Yu. O mekhanizmakh realizatsii tselej natsional'nogo razvitiya Rossii v usloviyakh smeny tekhnologicheskikh mirokhozyajstvennykh ukladov // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ehkonomicheskogo obschestva Rossii. 2021. T. 230, № 4. S. 66-70.

3. Glaz'ev S.Yu., Sukharev O.S., Afanas'eva O.N. Monetarnaya politika Rossii: negativnyj nakopitel'nyj ehffekt v ramkakh neoklassicheskoj modeli i ego preodolenie // Mikroehkonomika. 2022. № 2. S. 5-38.

4. Mikul'skij K.I. Rossiya v poiskakh modeli ehkonomicheskogo rosta // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2017. № 3-4. S. 5-15.

5. Osnovnye napravleniya edinoj gosudarstvennoj denezhno-kreditnoj politiki na 2023 goda i period 2024 i 2025 godov // M.: Bank Rossii. 2022. -159 s.

6. Sukharev O.S. Monetarnaya teoriya i makroehkonomika: vliyanie i granitsy denezhno-kreditnoj politiki // Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2016. № 2. S. 16-28.

7. Sukharev O.S., Afanas'eva O.N. Raspredelenie instrumentov monetarnoj politiki po tselyam razvitiya // Obschestvo i ehkonomika. 2022. C. 5-28.

8. Khelpman Eh. Zagadka ehkonomicheskogo rosta // M.: Izdatel'stvo Instituta E.T. Gajdara. 2011. -240 s.

9. Filiani P. Optimal monetary–fiscal policy in the euro area liquidity crisis // Journal of Macroeconomics. Vol. 70, 2021, 103364 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2021.103364

10. Fontana G., Passarella M.V. Unconventional monetary policies from conventional theories: Modern lessons for central bankers // Journal of Policy Modeling Vol. 42 (3). 2020. Pr. 503-519.

11. Garga V, Singh S.R. Output hysteresis and optimal monetary policy // Journal of Monetary Economics. Vol. 117. 2021. Pr. 871-886.

12. Grauwe P., Ji, Y. Structural reforms, animal spirits, and monetary policies // European Economic Review. Vol. 124. 2020, 103395 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103395

13. Leea K-S., Werner R.A. Reconsidering Monetary Policy: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Interest Rates and Nominal GDP Growth in the U.S., U.K., Germany and Japan // Ecological Economics. Vol. 146. April 2018. Pr. 26-34.

14. Liu D., Sun W., Chang L. Monetary–fiscal policy regime and macroeconomic dynamics in China // Economic Modelling. Vol. 95. 2021. Pr. 121-135.

15. Mandel A., Veetil V.P. Monetary dynamics in a network economy // Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. Vol.125, 2021. 104084 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2021.104084

16. Mumtaz H., Theodoridis K. Dynamic effects of monetary policy shocks on macroeconomic volatility // Journal of Monetary Economics. Vol. 114. 2020. Pr. 262-282.

17. Peña R. Should monetary policy lean against the wind in a small-open economy? Revisiting the Tinbergen rule // Latin American Journal of Central Banking. Vol. 2(1). 2021. 100026 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.latcb.2021.100026

18. Sawyer M., Passarella M.V. A Comprehensive Comparison of Fiscal and Monetary Policies: A Comparative Dynamics Approach // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. Vol. 59. 2021. Pr. 384-404.

19. Tinbergen J. Economic Policy: Principles and Design Nortn-Holland. 1956. -276 p.