All
 
|
 
 


Management paradigms for the reconfiguration of regional entrepreneurial ecosystems
 
PIIS020736760013387-4-1
DOI10.31857/S020736760013387-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
N. Solodilova 
Affiliation: Institute of Economics and Service of the Ufa State Petroleum Technological University
Address: Russian Federation, Ufa
R. Malikov
Affiliation: Institute of Economics and service of Ufa state oil technical University
Address: Russian Federation
C. Grishin
Affiliation: Institute of Economics, Finance and business, Bashkir State University
Address: Russian Federation
Journal nameObshchestvo i ekonomika
EditionIssue 1
Pages22-41
Abstract

The author evaluates the need for a systematic approach to the study of entrepreneurship and examines the concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems based on it. In the article the logic of developing a paradigm for managing a regional business ecosystem is justified; the manageable key components of regional business ecosystems are identified allowing to change the configuration of the ecosystem with the view of increasing its productivity. 

Using the methods of econometric modeling, a methodological tool is proposed for assessing the effectiveness of the impact of the new institutional configuration of the regional business ecosystem on the performance of the business entity.

Keywordsentrepreneurial ecosystem, regional context, infrastructure, entrepreneurial networks; business ecosystem, innovation, institutional reconfiguration
Received22.01.2021
Publication date25.01.2021
Number of characters36284
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 624

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Doroshenko S., Shelomentsev A. Predprinimatel'skaya ehkosistema v sovremennykh sotsioehkonomicheskikh issledovaniyakh // Zhurnal ehkonomicheskoj teorii.  2017. № 4. S. 212-221.
2. Degtyarev A., Malikov R., Grishin K. Institutsional'naya konfiguratsiya regional'noj delovoj sredy: parametry proektirovaniya  // Voprosy ehkonomiki.  2014. № 11. S. 83-94.
3. Solodilova N., Malikov R., Grishin K.  Konfiguratsionnyj podkhod k issledovaniyu regional'noj ehkosistemy predprinimatel'stva  //   Ehkonomicheskaya politika.   2018a. Tom 3(57).   № 5. S. 134-155.
4. Solodilova N., Malikov R., Grishin K. Metodicheskij instrumentarij otsenki sostoyaniya regional'noj predprinimatel'skoj ehkosistemy   //  Ehkonomika regiona.   2018b. T. 14. Vyp. 4.  S. 1256-1269. DOI 10.17059/2018-4-16.
5. Baumol' U. Mikroteoriya innovatsionnogo predprinimatel'stva // Moskva: Izd-vo In-ta Gajdara. 2013.
6. Acs Z.A., Estrin S., Mickiewicz T. & Szerb, L.  Institutions, Entrepreneurship and Growth: The Role of National Entrepreneurial Ecosystems //  SSRN  Working paper.  2017b. N. 2912453. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2912453.
7. Acs  Z.A.,  Stam  E.,  Audretsch  D.B.  &  O’Connor  A. The  lineages  of  the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach // Small Business Economics. 2017a. vol.  49. P.1-17.
8. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Lehmann E.E., Licht G. National Systems of Entrepreneurship //  Small Business Economics. 2016. Vol. 16. № 4. P.527-535. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-016-9705-1.
9. Acs Z.J.,  Autio E. & Szerb L.  National systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications // Research Policy. 2014. Vol.  43 (3). P. 476-494.
10. Aldrich H. & Zimmer C. Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D.L. Sexton and R.W. Smiler, eds. The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship // Cambridge. MA: Ballinger.1986. P. 3-23.
11. Alvedalen J., & Boschma R. A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda // European Planning Studies, 2017. Vol.  25 (6). P. 887-903.
12. Audretsch D, Feldman M.   R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production // American Economic Review. 1996. Vol.  86 (3). P. 630-640.
13. Audretsch D., Cunningham J.A., Kuratko D., Lehmann E. Menter M.  Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2019. Vol.  44 (4). P. 313-325.
14. Audretsch D.B., Falck O., Feldman, M.P., & Heblich S. Local Entrepreneurship in Context // Regional Studies. 2011. Vol.  46 (3). P. 379-389.
15. Audretsch D.B., & Caiazza R. Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: cross-national analysis // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2016. Vol.  41 (6). P. 1247-1259.
16. Autio E., Rannikko  H. Retaining winners: Can Policy Boost High-growth Entrepreneur-ship? // Research Policy. 2015. Vol. 45. P. 42-55.
17. Autio E., Kenney M., Mustar P., Siegel D., & Wright M. Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context // Research Policy. 2014. Vol.  43 (7). P. 1097-1108.
18. Baumol W.  Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. // Journal of Political Economy.1990. Vol.  98 (5). P. 893-921.
19. Bygrave W., Zacharakis A.   Entrepreneurship // John Wiley & Sons: N. Y. 2007.
20. Boschma R., Lambooy J.  Evolutionary economics and economic geography // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 1999.  Vol.  49 (4). P. 411-29.
21. Birley S. The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process // Journal of Business Venturing.1985.  Vol. 1, issue 1. P. 107-117.
22. Bosma N., Content J., Sanders M. et al. Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth in Europe // Small Bus Econ . 2018.  Vol.  51. P. 483-499, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0012-x. 
23. Bruderl J., Preisendorfer P. Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Businesses // Small Business Economics, Springer. 1998. Vol. 10 (3). P. 213-225.
24. Brown  R., Mason  C. Looking inside the spiky bits: A critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems // Small Business Economic. 2017.  Vol.  49. P. 11-30.
25. Mason C., Brown R. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. Background paper prepared for the workshop organised by the OECD LEED. URL:  https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf  (Accessed 07 September 2020).
26. Cavallo  A., Ghezzi  A.,  Balocco  R.  Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions// International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2018. P. 1-24.
27. Cunningham J., Matthias M. & Katharine W.  Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: a principal investigator-centered governance framework // Small Business Economics. 2019.  Vol. 52. P.  545-562.
28. Colombo M., Dagnino G., Lehmann E., Salmador M. The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems // Small Business Economics.  2019.  Vol. 52 (2). P. 419-428.
29. Dahl M., Sorenson   O. The Embedded Entrepreneur // European Management Review. 2009. Vol. 6 (3). P.  172-181.
30. Dahl M., Sorenson   O. Home sweet home: entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures// Management Science. 2012. Vol.  58(6).  P.  1059-1071.
31. D’Aveni R.A. Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of  Strategic Maneuvering // New York: Free Press. 1994.
32. Den Harding E.,  Van Asseldonk T.  Business Ecosystems: A research framework for investigating the relation between structure,firm strategy and the pattern of innovation diffusion, ECOON − European Chaos // Complexity in Organizations Network.  2004.
33. Den Hartigh E., Tol M., Visscher W. The Health of a Business Ecosystem, ECOON − Annual Meeting Organizations as Chaotic Panaarchies. 2006.
34. Feldman M.   The Entrepreneurial Event Revisited: Firm Formation in a Regional Context // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2001. Vol. 10. № 4. P. 861-891.
35. Peltoniemi M., Vuori E. Business ecosystems as a tool for the conceptualization of the external diversity of an organization // Compexity, Science and Society Conference.  2005.
36. Feld B. Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city // John Wiley & Sons. 2012.
37. Figueiredo O., Guimaraes P., Woodward D. Homefield  advantage:  location  decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs // Journal of Urban Economics. 2002. Vol. 52 (2). P. 341-361.
38. Fradley, K., Troshani, I., Rampersad, G., De Ionno, P. An Organizing Vision Perspective on Green IS Development. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2012), Orlando, Florida, 16–19 December. 2012.URL:  http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1063&context=icis2012.  (Accessed 02 September 2020).
39. Gaddefors J., Anderson A.R., Entrepreneursheep and context: when entrepreneurship is greater than entrepreneurs // International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 2017. Vol.  23 (2). P. 267-278.
40. Grandori A. &  Soda, G. Inter-firm networks: antecedents, mechanisms, and forms // Organization Studies. 1995/ Vol. 16. № 2. P. 183-214.
41. Gossain S., Kandiah G. Reinventing Value: The New Business Ecosystem // Strategy& Leadership. 1998. Vol. 26 (5). P. 28-33.
42. Huggins R. The success and failure of policy-implanted inter-firm network initiatives: motivations, processes and structure // Entrepreneurship & Regional Development.  2000.  Vol. 12 (2). P. 111-135.
43. Isenberg D   The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. Dublin, from DanIsenberg 2011. URL: http://entrepreneurial-revolution.com/2011/05/11/the-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-as-a-new-paradigm-for-economic-policy-principles-for-cultivating-entrepreneurship/  (Accessed 07 September 2020).
44. Johannisson B. Business formation − a network approach Scandinavian // Journal of Management. 1988. Vol. 4, Issues 3-4.  P. 83-99.
45. Kuratko D. Corporate Entrepreneurship 2.0: Research Development and Future Directions // Foundations and Trends Rin Entrepreneurship. 2017. Vol. 13. № 6. P. 441-490. DOI: 10.1561/0300000082.
46. Lehmann E.,  Menter M.   University–Industry Collaboration And Regional Wealth // The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2016. Vol.  41 (6). P. 1284–1307.  DOI: 10.1007/s10961-015-9445-4.
47. Lehmann E.,  Menter M.   Public Cluster Policy and Neighboring Regions: Beggar-Thy-Neighbor?// Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2018. Vol.  27 (5–6) P. 420–437. DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2017.1374039.
48. Mina  A.,  Dagnino G.B.    Ben-Letaifa S.  Competition  and  Cooperation  in Entrepreneurial Ecosystems:  A  Life-Cycle  Analysis  of  Canadian  ICT  Ecosystems,  in: Belussi,  F.  &  Orsi,  L.  (eds.) // Innovation, Alliances and Networks in High-Tech Environment, Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 2016.  P.65-81.
49. Moore J. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review.   1993.  Vol. 71. P. 76-86.
50. Rampersad G.  Entrepreneurial Ecosystems:  A  Governance  Perspective // Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management. 2016.  Vol. 7 (3). P. 1122-1134.
51. Okamuro H., Kobayashi N.   The impact of regional factors on the start-up ratio in Japan // Journal of Small Business Management. 2006.  Vol. 44 (2). P. 310-322.
52. Porter M.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations // Free Press, New York. 1990.
53. Schumpeter J.  The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle // Hard University Press, Cambridge, MA.rva. 1934.
54. Shane S. Venkataraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field ofresearch // Academy of Management Review. 2000. Vol. 25. P. 217-226.
55. Shane S. A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual –Opportunity Nexus // Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (New Horizons in Entrepreneurship). 2003.
56. Stam  E. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique // European Planning Studies. 2015.  Vol.  23 (9). P.  1759-1769.
57. Stam, E.,   Spigel, B.   Entrepreneurial ecosystems. In R.Blackburn, D. De Clercq, J. Heinonen, & Z. Wang (Eds.),The SAGE Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. London: SAGE. forthcoming. 2017.URL: https://www.google.ru/search?ie=UTF8&hl=ru&q=Stam%2C%20E.%2C%20%26%20Spigel%2C%20B.%20%282017%29.%20Entrepreneurial%20ecosystems.%20In%20R.Blackburn%2C%20D.%20De%20Clercq%2C%20J.%20Heinonen%2C%20%26%20Z.%20Wang%20%28Eds.%29%2CThe%20SAGE%20Handbook%20of%20Small%20Business%20andEntrepreneurship.%20London%3A%20SAGE.%20forthcoming.  (Accessed 10 September 2020).
58. Sternberg  R.   Do EU Regional Policies Favour Regional Entrepreneurship? Empirical Evidence from Spain and Germany //  European Planning Studies. 2012. Vol. 20 (4). P. 583-608.
59. Spigel B. The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems // Entrepreneurship Theorya and Practice. 2017. Vol. 41 (1). P. 49-72.
60. Spilling Olav R. The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event // Journal of Business Research. 1996. Vol. 36, issue 1. P. 91-103.
61. Szarka J. Networking and small firms // International Small Business Journal.1990. Vol. 8 (2). P.  10-22. DOI:org/10.1177/026624269000800201.
62. Thurik R., Stam E., Audretsch D.   The Rise of the Entrepreneurial Economy and the Future of Dynamic Capitalism // Technovation. 2013. Vol. 33 (8-9). P. 302-310.
63. Van De Ven H. The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship // Journal of Business Venturing. 1993. Vol. 8, issue 3. P. 211-230.
64. Zahra S.A., Wright M. Entrepreneurship’s next act// Academy of Management Perspectives. 2011. Vol. 25(4). P. 67-83.
65. Zahra S.A., Wright M.,   Abdelgawad S.G. Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research // International Small Business Journal. 2014.  Vol.  32 (5). P. 479-500.  DOI: org/10.1177/0266242613519807.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up