The problem of Russia`s socio-economic modernization and the “path dependence” effect

 
PIIS020736760010112-2-1
DOI10.31857/S020736760010112-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Ufa
Journal nameObshchestvo i ekonomika
EditionIssue 6
Pages5-24
Abstract

The article considers the problem of influence of the previous development trajectory, or the “path dependence” effect, on the existing institutional structure of Russia and the possibility of socio-economic modernization. The author claims that the said effect should be taken into account in regard to the concept of inclusive and extractive institutions. The factors of rent-oriented behavior and autocratic power are considered as clear manifestations of the “path dependence” effect hampering modernization. Several options for the implementation of socio-economic modernization in Russia are proposed considering the specifics of its institutional structure.

Keywords“path dependence” effect, mobilization development, conservative modernization, inclusive institutions, rent-oriented behavior, autocracy, centralized power, patent law
AcknowledgmentThe article was prepared as a part of the plan of research work of UFRC RAS according to the state order of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Received28.06.2020
Publication date29.06.2020
Number of characters48752
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 760

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Liebowitz, S J & Margolis, Stephen E. Path Dependence, Lock-in, and History / Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization // Oxford University Press, 1995,vol. 11(1), pp. 205-226;

2. Nort D. K. Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ehkonomiki // M.: Fond ehkonomicheskoj knigi «Nachala», 1997. 180 s.

3. Nureev R.M., Latov Yu.V. Rossiya i Evropa: ehffekt kolei (opyt institutsional'nogo analiza istorii ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya) // Kaliningrad. 2009. 294 s.

4. Nureev R. M. Rossiya posle krizisa ehffekt kolei // JIS. 2010. №2.

5. Polterovich V.M. Institutsional'nye lovushki: est' li vykhod? // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2004. N 3.

6. Nureev R. M., Latov Yu.V. Kogda i pochemu razoshlis' puti Rossii i Zapadnoj Evropy (podkhod s pozitsii institutsional'noj ehkonomicheskoj istorii) // Mir Rossii. 2011. № 4. S. 24–59.

7. Prigozhin I., Stengers I. Poryadok iz khaosa: Novyj dialog cheloveka s prirodoj / Per. s angl. // M.: Progress, 1986. 432 s.

8. Balatskij E.V., Pliskevich N.M. Ehkonomicheskij rost v usloviyakh ehkstraktivnykh institutov: sovetskij paradoks i sovremennye sobytiya // Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Ehtnologiya. 2017. №4.

9. Vasil'ev L.S. Vostok i Zapad v istorii (osnovnye parametry problematiki) / Al'ternativnye puti k tsivilizatsii: kol. Monografiya // M., 2000. S. 96-114.

10. Klyuchevskij V.O. Kurs russkoj istorii. Lektsiya 68. Znachenie reformy Petra Velikogo [Ehlektronnyj resurs] URL: http://www.kulichki.com/inkwell/text/special/history/kluch/kluch68.htm

11. Klyamkin I.M. Postmilitaristskoe gosudarstvo / Rossijskoe gosudarstvo: vchera, segodnya, zavtra // M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo. 2007. S. 11–30.

12. Obolonskij A.V. Na sluzhbe gosudarevoj: k istorii rossijskogo chinovnichestva // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1997. № 5. S. 63–76.

13. Lenin V.I. Grozyaschaya katastrofa i kak s nej borot'sya // V.I. Lenin. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij v 55 tomakh. T. 34 // Izdatel'stvo politicheskoj literatury, 1958. S. 151–199.

14. Devletov O.U. Ehkonomicheskaya istoriya / Uchebnik. 2-e izdanie // M., 2013.

15. Asemoglu D., Robinson Dzh.A. Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye / Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, protsvetaniya i nischety // M.: AST, 2016. 693 s.

16. Polterovich V.M. Instituty dogonyayuschego razvitiya (k proektu novoj modeli ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii) // Ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz. 2016. № 5. S. 88–107.

17. Pliskevich N.M. «Path dependence» i problemy modernizatsii mobilizatsionnogo tipa // Mir Rossii. 2016. № 2.

18. Revinskij D.O. Patentovanie izobretenij v Rossii (1812-1870 gg.) / Ehkonomicheskaya istoriya. Ezhegodnik. 2001 // M.: ROSSPEhN, 2002. S. 339-376.

19. Polterovich V., Popov V., Tonis A. Ehkonomicheskaya politika, kachestvo institutov i mekhanizmy «resursnogo proklyatiya» // M., GU-VShEh. 2007.

20. Latkov A.V. Osnovnye modeli rentoorientirovannogo povedeniya v sovremennoj ehkonomike // Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskogo universiteta. 2007. №15.

21. Volkov V. Politehkonomiya nasiliya, ehkonomicheskij rost i konsolidatsiya gosudarstva // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 1999. № 10. C. 44–59.

22. Zulkarnay, I. Why Russia Has Again Been Sliding from Federalism to Unitarianism // Public Administration Issues, Special Issue 2018, pp. 116–132.

23. Akhiezer A.S. Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta /Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika Rossii. T. I. Ot proshlogo k buduschemu // Novosibirsk: Sibirskij khronograf, 1998, 804 s.

24. Matveenko Yu.I. Modernizatsiya: teoriya i sovremennost' // Izvestiya TulGU. Gumanitarnye nauki. 2012. №1.

25. Sapronova M.A. Arabo-musul'manskij mir: istoriya, geografiya, obschestvo // Kazan': Kazan. un-t. 2013. 360 s.

26. Polischuk L., Menyashev R. Ehkonomicheskoe znachenie sotsial'nogo kapitala // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2011. (12). S. 46-65.

27. Mozebakh V. Yaponskoe "ehkonomicheskoe chudo": suschnost' i podkhody k ponimaniyu // Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2018. №4.

28. Masao O., Noble D. Delivering the Goods: Entrepreneurship and Innovation In a Japanese Corporation // Tokyo: the international house of Japan. 2004. 218 p.

29. Novikov I. V., Utkina V.A. Ehkonomicheskoe razvitie Yuzhnoj Korei // Ehkonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika. 2017. № 4.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up