Laboratory inject 3d printer  for powder materials

The paper presents the results of development and testing of a laboratory 3D inkjet printer with an open architecture. The ability of designed 3D printer to forming structures with defined architectonics from different powder substances with an average particle size of 50–150 μm were shown. Installed drop-on-demand system allows dispensing dropwise liquids with a pH of 2 to 9 and a viscosity of 1 to 1000 mPa·s as a binder components. The printing resolution of the developed system is 100 microns, which is comparable to the resolution of commercially available powder 3D inkjet printers.

Keywords

3D printer, additive techniques, rapid prototyping, drop-on-demand, laboratory equipment

Received

09.10.2018

Publication date

10.10.2018

Number of characters

672

Cite Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in

GOST	Mironov A., Popov V., Mironova Laboratory inject 3d printer for powder materials // Nauchnoe priborostroenie – 2018. – V. 28. – Issue 3 C. 130-136 [Electronic resource]. URL: http://ras.jes.su/np/s207987840000394-2-1-en (circulation date: 19.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S086858860001106-8
MLA	Mironov, Anton, Popov, Vladimir, Mironova, O. "Laboratory inject 3d printer for powder materials." Nauchnoe priborostroenie 28.3 (2018):130-136. DOI: 10.31857/S086858860001106-8
APA	Mironov A., Popov V., Mironova (2018). Laboratory inject 3d printer for powder materials. Nauchnoe priborostroenie 28(3), pp.130-136 DOI: 10.31857/S086858860001106-8

Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Lee J.-Y., An J., Chua Ch.K. Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Applied Materials Today, 2017, vol. 7, pp. 120–133.

2. Barinov S.M., Vakhrushev I.V., Komlev V.S., Miro-nov A.V., Popov V.K., Teterina A.Yu., Fedotov A.Yu., Ya-rygin K.N. 3D Printing of ceramic scaffolds for engineer-ing of bone tissue. Inorganic Materials: Applied Re-search, 2015, vol. 6, pp. 316–322.

3. Bertol L.S., Schabbach R., Santos L.A.L. Different post-processing conditions for 3D bioprinted α-tricalcium phosphate scaffolds. Journal of Materials Science: Mate-rials in Medicine, 2017, vol. 28, no 10, art. 168.

4. Schrepfer I., Wang X.H. Progress in 3D printing technol-ogy in health care. Organ Manufacturing, Nova Science Publishers Inc., Hauppauge, N.Y., USA, 2015, pp. 29–74.

5. Gudapati H., Dey M., Ozbolat I. A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and future. Biomaterials, 2016, vol. 102, pp. 20–42.

6. Gao G., Yonezawa T., Hubbell K., Dai G., Cui X. Inkjet-bioprinted acrylated peptides and PEG hydrogel with hu-man mesenchymal stem cells promote robust bone and cartilage formation with minimal printhead clogging. Bio-technol. J., 2015, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1568–1577.

7. Yun I. Printed electronics: current trends and application. 2016. 146 p. URL: http://www.ebook777.com/printed-electronics-current-trends-applications/.

8. Kamyshny A., Steinke J., Magdassi S. Metal-based in-kjet inks for printed electronics. The Open Applied Phys-ics Journal, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 19–36.

9. Wang X., Ao Q., Tian X., Fan J., Wei Y., Hou W.,Tong H., Bai S. 3D bioprinting technologies for hard tis-sue and organ engineering. Materials, 2016, vol. 9, no. 10, art. 802.

10. Kruth J‐P., Mercelis P., Van Vaerenbergh J., Froyen L., Rombouts M. Binding mechanisms in selective laser sin-tering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2005, vol. 11, pp. 26–36.

11. Budding A., Vaneker T.H.J., Winnubst A.J.A. Open source powder based rapid prototyping machine for ce-ramics. Procedia CIRP, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 533–538

12. Lee J., Kim K.E., Bang S., Noh I., Lee C. A desktop mul-ti-material 3D bio-printing system with open-source hardware and software. International journal of precision engineering and manufacturing, 2017, vol. 18, pp. 605– 612.

13. Kinstlinger I.S., Bastian A., Paulsen S.J., Hwang D.H., Ta A.H., Yalacki D.R., Schmidt T., Miller J.S. Open-source selective laser sintering (open SLS) of nylon and biocompatible polycaprolactone. PLoS ONE, 2015, vol. 11, art. e0147399.

14. Gao Q., He Y., Fu J.Z., Liu A., Ma L. Coaxial nozzle-assisted 3D bioprinting with built-in microchannels for nutrients delivery. Biomaterials, 2015, vol. 61, pp. 203– 215

15. Bégin-Drolet A., Dussault M.A., Fernandez S.A., La-rose-Dutil J., Leask R.L., Hoesli C.A., Ruel J. Design of a 3D printer head for additive manufacturing of sugar glass for tissue engineering applications. Additive Manufactur-ing, 2017, vol. 15, pp. 29–39.

16. Kun K. Reconstruction and development of a 3D printer us-ing FDM technology. Procedia Engineering, 2016, vol. 149, pp. 203–211