Making of the Science of Public Law in Europe

 
PIIS013038640025460-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013038640025460-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation:
Samara State Medical University
Institute of World History, RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Samara
Journal nameNovaia i noveishaia istoriia
EditionIssue 5
Pages5-17
Abstract

In contrast to the approaches widely accepted in historiography, in this article the author analyses the content of the concepts of “natural law”, “contract” and “sovereignty” developed by representatives of the “school of natural law” (Grotius, Pufendorf, Burlamaqui, Barbeyrac), as well as their followers (Locke, Hobbes, Rousseau). After Grotius, the individualistic concept of “natural law” emerges in the writings of Pufendorf, which led the representatives of the “school” to look for the form of the social contract in the private legal agreements of the people with the bearer of sovereign power. The author demonstrates that Rousseau, developing his criticism of these ideas, created a new concept of a public law contract in which the “sovereign” is not a party to the agreement, and the people do not alienate supreme power in his favour, remaining its bearer and its only source. At the same time, he did not raise the question of the real “origins of sovereignty”, which the representatives of the “school’ and their followers focused a lot of attention on, since Rousseau's social contract is not a historical fact. Thus, the formation of the science of public law in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries reflects the transition from the concepts of “natural law”, “contract” and “sovereignty” based on fact to the concepts based on law.

Keywordspolitical science, history of public law, natural law, social contract, sovereignty, Hobbes, Grotius, Locke, history of legal thought, European countries, history of philosophy
Received11.07.2023
Publication date31.10.2023
Number of characters42657
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 70

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aliushin A.L. Totalitarnoe gosudarstvo v modeli i v realnisti. Ot Russo k stalinizmu Totalitarian State in Model and Reality. From Rousseau to Stalinism] // Totalitarizm kak istoritchskij fenomen [Totalitarianism as a historical phenomenon]. Moskva, 1989. S. 163–168. (In Russ.)

2. Grotius H. O prave vojny i mira. Tri knigi, v kotorykh ob iasniaiutsia estestvennoe pravo i pravo narodov, a takzhe printsipy publichnogo prava [On the Law of War and Peace. Three books that explain natural law and the law of nations, as well as the principles of public law]. Moskva, 1994. (In Russ.)

3. Gurvitch G.D. Pravda voli monarshey i eye zapadnoevropeyskiye istotchniki [The truth of the will of the monarch is its Western European sources]. Yuriev, 1915. (In Russ.)

4. Hobbes Th. Sochinenia [Works]: v 2-kh t. Moskva, 1988. (In Russ.)

5. Locke J. Sotchinenia [Works]: v 3-kh t. Moskva, 1988. (In Russ.)

6. Medushevski A.N. Demokratia i tiranija v Novoe i Novejchee vremia [Democracy and tyranny in modern and modern times] // Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. 1993. № 10. S. 7–23. (In Russ.)

7. Rousseau J.-J. Traktaty [Treatises]. Moskva, 1969. (In Russ.)

8. Schmitt K. Diktatura. Ot istokov sovremennoy idei suvereniteta do proletarskoj klassovoj bor’by [Dictatorship. From the Оrigins of the Modern Idea of Sovereignty to the Proletarian Class Struggle]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2005. (In Russ.)

9. Spektorskij E.V. Problema sotzial'noi fiziki v XVII stoletii. [The problem of social physics in the 17th century]. T. I–II. Sankt-Peterburg, 2006. (In Russ.)

10. Zanin S.V. Obstchesvennyi ideal Russo i frantzuzskoe Prosvestchenie XVIII veka [The Social Ideal of J.-J. Rousseau and the French Enlightenment of the 18th century]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2007. (In Russ.)

11. Bodin J. Six livres de la république. Lyon, 1578.

12. Burlamaqui J.-J. Principes du Droit politique. T. 1–2. Amsterdam, 1751.

13. D’Eichthal E. Souveraineté du peuple et gouvernement. Paris, 1895.

14. Derathé R. J.-J. Rousseau et la science politique de son temps. Paris, 1992.

15. Gierke O. Iohannes Althusius und die Entwicklung der natürrechtlichen Staatstheorien. Breslau, 1889.

16. Goldie M. Lock and anglican royalism // Political Studies. 1983. № 31. P. 61–85.

17. Goyard-Fabre S. L’interminable querelle sur le Contrat social. Ottawa, 1983.

18. Histoire de la pensée politique moderne: 1450–1700 / ed. J.H. Burns. Paris, 1997.‬‬‬.

19. Hobbes Th. De cive // Thomae Hobbes Malmesburiensis Opera Philosophica quae Latina Scripsit / ed. G. Molesworth. Londoni, 1839. T. II. P. 157–432.

20. Hugoni Grotii. De Jure Praedae. Paris, 1869.

21. Johannis Althusii. Politica methodice digesta atque exemplis sacris et profanis illustrata: Cui in fine adjuncta est Oratio Panegyrica, De necessitate, utilitate et antiquitate scholarum‬. Nassoviorum, 1614. ‬

22. Ioannis Saresberiensis Policraticus sive De nugis curialium & vestigiis philosophorum libri octo // Joannis Saresberiensis Carnotensis episcopi opera Omnia. Paris, 1855. Р. 379–822.

23. Oakeshott M. Hobbes on civil Association. Indianapolis, 1937 (1975).

24. Pufendorf S. Le droit de la nature et de gens. Caen, 1989.

25. Rousseau J.-J. Œuvres complètes de J.-J. Rousseau. Vol. 1–5. Paris, 1962–1995.

26. Terrel J. Les théories du pacte social: droit naturel, souveraineté et contrat de Bodin à Rousseau‬. Paris, 2001‬. ‬‬‬‬‬‬

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up