Napoleon Bonaparte, General Jean-Baptiste Jourdan, and the Problem of Banditry in Piedmont, 1800–1802

The Consulship of Napoleon Bonaparte is often presented as a time of his political triumph as both politician and legislator. However, this very stereotypical assessment requires further clarifications. As the latest research suggests, the whole period between the Brumaire and the proclamation of the Empire was a period of difficult search for new methods of governance under very difficult circumstances. One of the serious problems in the formation of the new borders of Napoleonic France in the early years of the nineteenth century continued to be banditry (brigandage). In a number of regions, this phenomenon had a distinct political colouring. In the French political lexicon of the era, it referred to collective violence of any kind, anti-state actions, as well as various forms of criminal robbery. The situation was most acute in the peripheral regions, particularly in Piedmont. Although the flames of the acute civil conflict of 1799 had subsided here, yet the causes of this mass phenomenon were extremely deep. The author aims to analyse the ways of solving the problem of banditry in the context of the overall Napoleonic policy, to show the role of the French administration and, in particular, of General Jean-Baptiste Jourdan in this process during the formation of new institutions of power in the Consulate period. Drawing on the archival collections of the French Ministries of General Police and Justice, the Piedmont General Administration from the French National Archives, as well as some materials from the archival collections of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, he attempts to reconstruct a set of measures to eradicate banditry. The new authorities, and above all the chief administrator of Piedmont, General Jourdan, as well as the prefects and mayors, had to resort both to the tactics of “mobile columns” and extraordinary justice, but also to seek compromise with the rural oligarchy, the parish clergy and the peasant masses in order to maintain the fragile social order. What is also significant is that the experience gained by the French in the fight against banditry in Piedmont was later successfully disseminated to other regions of Italy, and that it was this experience that largely served as the basis for the formation of Napoleon's policy of “cultural imperialism”.

Keywords

France, Italy, Napoleonic Wars, occupation, popular movements, peasant movement, Piedmont, Napoleon I Bonaparte, Consulate, First Empire, Jean-Baptiste Jourdan, banditry, Kingdom of Sardinia

Received

08.06.2023

Publication date

31.10.2023

Number of characters

45293

Cite

GOST	Mitrofanov A. Napoleon Bonaparte, General Jean-Baptiste Jourdan, and the Problem of Banditry in Piedmont, 1800–1802 // Novaia i noveishaia istoriia – 2023. – Issue 5 C. 34-47 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://nni.jes.su/S013038640025413-2-1 (circulation date: 23.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013038640028068-2
MLA	Mitrofanov, Andrey "Napoleon Bonaparte, General Jean-Baptiste Jourdan, and the Problem of Banditry in Piedmont, 1800–1802." Novaia i noveishaia istoriia 5 (2023):34-47. DOI: 10.31857/S013038640028068-2
APA	Mitrofanov A. (2023). Napoleon Bonaparte, General Jean-Baptiste Jourdan, and the Problem of Banditry in Piedmont, 1800–1802. Novaia i noveishaia istoriia (5), pp.34-47 DOI: 10.31857/S013038640028068-2

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 73

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bondarchuk V.S. Italyanskoe krestyanstvo v XVIII v. Agrarnye otnosheniya i sotsial’noe dvizhenie v Sardinskom korolevstve [Italian peasantry in the 18th century. Agrarian relations and social movement in the Sardinian kingdom]. Moskva, 1980. (In Russ.)

2. Forrest A. Za kromkoy polya boya. Zhizn’ voennykh vo vremena Revolyutsionnykh i Napoleonovskikh vojn [Beyond the edge of the battlefield. Life of the military during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wars]. Moskva, 2022. (In Russ.)

3. Korotkov S.N. “Zakony bolee zhestokie, chem sama vojna”. O politicheskom znachenii amnistii Bonaparta e`migrantam [“Laws more cruel than war itself”. On the political significance of Bonaparte's amnesty to emigrants] // Frantsuzskiy ezhegodnik [French Yearbook]. 2006. Moskva, 2006. S. 168–180. (In Russ.)

4. Mitrofanov A.A. “Al'piiskaia Vandeia”. Transformatsiia narodnogo protesta v Savoie 1793 goda [“Alpine Vendée”. Transformation of the Popular Protest in Savoy, 1793] // Novaya i Novejshaya Istoriya [Modern and Contemporary History]. 2022. № 5. S. 6–73. DOI: 10.31857/S013038640019935-6 (In Russ.)

5. Mitrofanov A.A. Dvizhenie barbe v epokhu Frantsuzskoi revoliutsii: krest'iane, kontrrevoliutsionery, bandity? [The Barbet Movement in the Times of the French Revolution: Peasants, Counter-Revolutionaries, Bandits?] // Elektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal “Istoriya” [Electronic scientific and educational Journal “History”]. 2021. T. 12. Vyp. 7 (105). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840015439-1-1/ (access date: 10.01.2023)] (In Russ.)

6. Mitrofanov A.A. Myatezhnaya Savojya: ot “velikoy fermentatsii” do frantsuzskoy okkupacii 1791–1792 gg. Po materialam AVPRI [Rebellious Savoy: from the «great fermentation» to the French occupation of 1791–1792. Based on the materials of the Archive of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire] // Frantsuzskiy ezhegodnik [French Yearbook]. 2018. Т. 51. Moskva, 2018. S. 78–92 (In Russ.)

7. Mitrofanov A.A. Problema “banditizma” epokhi Direktorii v sovremennoy frantsuzskoy istoriografii [The problem of “banditry” of the era of the Directory in modern French historiography] // Frantsuzskiy ezhegodnik [French Yearbook]. 2022. Т. 55. Moskva, 2022. S. 356–370. (In Russ.)

8. Tchoudinov A.V. Narody protiv Frantsuzskoy revolyutsii [Peoples against the French Revolution] // Frantsuzskiy ezhegodnik [French Yearbook]. 2016. Moskva, 2016. S. 5–35. (In Russ.)

9. Boudon J.-O. L’Empire des polices. Comment Napoléon faisait régner l’ordre. Paris, 2017.

10. Bourguet-Rouveyre J. Jean-Baptiste Jourdan et le Consulat // La plume et le sabre / Sous la dir. M. Biard, A. Crépin, B. Gainot. Paris, 2002. P. 455–463.

11. Boyer F. Carlo Bossi et l’Administration Générale du Piemont (1800–1802) // Rassegna storica del Risorgimento. 1969. № 77. Р. 44–57.

12. Boyer F. L'esprit public au Piémont en l'an X et en l'an XI // Revue de l'Institut Napoléon. 1969. Avril. P. 149–157.

13. Broers M. Napoleonic Imperialism and the Savoyard Monarchy 1773–1821. State Building in Piedmont. Lewiston [N.Y.], 1997.

14. Broers M. The Napoleonic Empire in Italy, 1796–1814. Cultural Imperialism in a European Context? London, 2005.

15. Broers M. Napoleon’s other war. Bandits, rebels and their pursuers in the Age of Revolutions. Oxford, 2010.

16. Brown H.G. From Organic Society to Security State: The war on brigandage in France 1797–1802 // Journal of Modern History. 1997. № 69. Р. 661–695.

17. Brown H.G. Ending the French Revolution: Violence, Justice, and Repression from the Terror to Napoleon. Charlottesville, 2006.

18. Clay S. Le brigandage en Provence du Directoire au Consulat (1795–1802) // Du Directoire au Consulat. Brumaire dans l’histoire du lien politique et de l’état-nation. Lille, 2001. T. III. P. 67–89.

19. Clay S. Justice, vengeance et passé révolutionnaire: les crimes de la terreur blanche // Annales historiques de la Révolution française. 2007. № 350. Р. 109–133.

20. Collini A. Il tramonto di un sogno. La fine dell’ideologia giacobina in Canavese (1800–1802). Torino, 2017.

21. Correspondance générale publiée par la Fondation Napoléon. Pacifications. T. III. Paris, 2006.

22. Davico R. Prix et conjoncture: la “période” napoléonienne en Piémont. Quelques réflexions au sujet d'une crise // Revue Historique. 1972. T. 248. Fasc. 1 (503). P. 25–48.

23. Davis J.A. Conflict and control: law and order in Nineteenth-century Italy. New Jersey, 1988.

24. Fischer L.J. Jacobin General. Jean Baptiste Jourdan and the French Revolution 1792–1799. Vol. I–II. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. Historical Dissertations and Theses. [S. l.], 1978.

25. Forrest A. Déserteurs et insoumis sous la Révolution et l’Empire. Paris, 1988.

26. Forrest A. Deserteurs et brigands sous la Revolution et l'Empire: état de la question // Les brigands. Criminalité et protestation politique (1750–1850). Rennes, 2013. P. 91–106.

27. Grab A. State power, brigandage and rural resistance in Napoleonic Italy // European History Quarterly. 1995. Vol. 25. P. 39–70.

28. Hulot F. Le maréchal Jourdan. Paris, 2010.

29. Iafelice M. Barbets! La résistance à la domination française dans le pays niçois 1792–1814. Nice, 1998.

30. Jourdan J.-B. Le Dix-Huit Brumaire. Extrait des Mémoires du général Jourdan, communiqué par le vicomte de Grouchy // Le Carnet historique et littéraire: revue mensuelle, rétrospective et littéraire. 1901. Février. P. 161–172.

31. Lignereux A. Les Impériaux. Administrer et habiter l'Europe de Napoléon. Paris, 2019.

32. Marion M. Le brigandage pendant la Révolution. Paris, 1935.

33. Rao A.-M. Il patriottismo repubblicano di Carlo Botta // Il Giacobino pentito. Carlo Botta fra Napoleone e Washington. Roma, 2010. P. 229–246.

34. Ricuperati G. Lo Stato sabaudo nel Settecento: dal trionfo delle burocrazie alla crisi d'antico regime. Torino, 2001.

35. Ruggiero M. I briganti di Piemonte Napoleonico. Torino, 1968.

36. Ruggiero M. La rivolta dei contadini piemontesi (1796–1802). Torino, 1974.

37. Ruggiero M. Anno del fuoco 1799. I cosacchi e la massa cristiana in Piemonte. Pinerolo, 1999.

38. Ruggiero M. La Carmagnola. Rivoluzione Francese in Piemonte (1796–1799). Torino, 2018.

39. Sottocasa V. Les brigands et la Revolution. Violences politiques et criminalité dans le Midi (1789–1802). Ceyzerieu, 2016.

40. Vaccarino G. I giacobini piemontesi (1794–1814). T. I–II. Roma, 1989.

41. Valentin R. Le maréchal Jourdan. Paris, 1956.

42. Zanotto A. Témoignages et documents pour l'histoire de la Vallée d'Aoste pendant la Révolution et l'Empire // Société académique, religieuse et scientifique du duché d'Aoste. Bulletin. 1965. № 42. P. 183–266.