How is the History of the Church Possible? (Church History as an Independent Discipline in the Light of Epistemology)

The article discusses the similarities and differences between the epistemes and paradigms of academic knowledge from the standpoint of the philosophy of science of Thomas Kuhn, Gaston Bachelard, Imre Lakatos, Michel Foucault, Giorgio Agamben. According to the views of T. Kuhn and his followers, if the paradigm is characterized by normativism, methodological systematicity, regularity, and some other signs of positive knowledge, then the episteme is characterized by methodological amorphousness, the presence of “hidden structures”, a priori epistemological approaches, etc. The history of science can state the fact of changing scientific paradigms in the following sequence: classical – non-classical – post-non-classical – neoclassical – post-post-non-classical. This statement is true under three assumptions: (a) we are talking exclusively about the Humanities; (b) different paradigms can coexist simultaneously; (c) in the course of “turns” in the Humanities, a sharp transition of discourse (both scientific and philosophical) from one paradigm to another is possible, bypassing one or more intermediate links of the specified chain. Giorgio Agamben, relying on the ideas of Aristotle and Karl Schmitt, politicizes the concept of “a paradigm” in the discourse on theology and says that there are two “metaparadigms”: (a) political, i.e. official, and (b) economic, i.e. private. The author discusses the scientific validity of Church History as an independent academic discipline from the cognitive and systemic points of view in the context of the “meta-paradigmatic” approach of Giorgio Agamben and predicts possible combination of several paradigms and their alternatives – episteme in one scientific discourse.

Keywords

Church, Church History, philosophy of history, philosophy of science, episteme, paradigm, “metaparadigm”, religious studies

Received

17.09.2020

Publication date

29.01.2021

Number of characters

26028

Cite

GOST	Davydov I. How is the History of the Church Possible? («Church History» as an Independent Discipline in the Light of Epistemology) // Novaia i noveishaia istoriia – 2021. – Issue 1 C. 7-17 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://nni.jes.su/S013038640013374-9-1 (circulation date: 07.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013038640013374-9
MLA	Davydov, Ivan "How is the History of the Church Possible? («Church History» as an Independent Discipline in the Light of Epistemology)." Novaia i noveishaia istoriia 1 (2021):7-17. DOI: 10.31857/S013038640013374-9
APA	Davydov I. (2021). How is the History of the Church Possible? («Church History» as an Independent Discipline in the Light of Epistemology). Novaia i noveishaia istoriia (1), pp.7-17 DOI: 10.31857/S013038640013374-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 581

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aron R. Izbrannoie: Izmereniia istoricheskogo soznaniia [Dimensions of Historical Consciousness]. Moskva, 2004. (In Russ.)

2. Aron R. Izbrannoie: Vvedenie v filosofiiu istorii [Introduction to the Philosophy of History]. Moskva - Sankt-Peterburg, 2000. (In Russ.)

3. Beduell G. Istoriia Tserkvi [Church History]. Moskva, 1996. (In Russ.)

4. Blouin F., Rozenberg U. Proiskhozhdenie proshlogo. “Podlinnost'” dlia istorikov i arkhivistov [Processing the Past. Contesting Authority in History and the Archives]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2017. (In Russ.)

5. Carnap R. Znachenie i neobkhodimost'. Issledovaniia po semantike i modal'noi logike [Meaning and Necessity. A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic]. Moskva, 1959. (In Russ.)

6. Danto A.S. Analiticheskaia filosofiia istorii [Analytical Philosophy of History]. Moskva, 2002. (In Russ.).

7. Evoliutsionnaia epistemologiia i logika sotsial'nykh nauk: Karl Popper i ego kritiki / Sost. D.G. Lakhuti, V.N. Sadovskii, V.K. Finn [Evolutionary Epistemology and the Logic of the S-cial Sciences: Karl Popper and His Critics / Сomp. D.G. Lakhuti, V.N. Sadovskii, V.K. Finn] Moskva, 2000. (In Russ.)

8. Filosofiia i metodologiia istorii / Obshch. red. I. S. Kona [Philosophy and Methodology of History / Ed. I.S. Kona]. Moskva, 1977. (In Russ.)

9. Foucault M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiia gumanitarnykh nauk [Words and Things. Archeology of Human Sciences]. Sant-Peterburg, 1994. (In Russ.)

10. Il'in V.V. Filosofiia istorii [Philosophy of History]. Moskva, 2003. (In Russ.)

11. Il'in V.V. Teoriia poznaniia. Epistemologiia [Theory of Knowledge. Epistemology.] Moskva, 1994. (In Russ.)

12. Il'in V.V. Teoriia poznaniia. Vvedenie. Obshchie problemy. [Theory of Knowledge. Introduction. General Problems]. Moskva, 1993. (In Russ.)

13. Istochnikovedenie / Otv. red. M.F. Rumiantseva [Source Criticism / Repl. M.F. Rumiantseva]. Moskva, 2015. (In Russ.)

14. Ivanov S.A. Blazhennye pokhaby: Kul'turnaia istoriia iurodstva [Blissful Pokhaby. A Cultural History of Foolishness “in Christ”]. Moskva, 2005. (In Russ.)

15. Kak my pishem istoriiu? / Otv. red. G. Garreta, G. Diufo, L.V. Pimenova [How do we write history? / Repl. G. Garreta, G. Diufo, L.V. Pimenova]. Moskva, 2013. (In Russ.)

16. Lakatos I. Fal'sifikatsiia i metodologiia nauchno-issledovatel'skikh program [Refutability and Methodology of Academic Research Programmes]. Moskva, 1995. (In Russ.)

17. Lakatos I. Izbrannye proizvedeniia po filosofii i metodologii nauki [Selected Works on Philosophy and Methodology of Science]. Moskva, 2008. (In Russ.)

18. Lappo-Danilevskii A.S. Metodologiia istorii [Methodology of History]. Moskva, 2006. (In Russ.)

19. Letopis' Serafimo-Diveevskogo monastyria / Sost. arkhim. Serafim (Chichagov). Izd. 2-e. [Chronicles of Seraphim-Diveyevo Monastery / Comp. arhim. Serafim (Chichagov)]. Sankt- Pe-terburg, 1903. (In Russ.)

20. Lortts I. Istoriia Tserkvi, rassmotrennaia v sviazi s istoriei idei. T. 1–2 [The History of the Church, Considered in Connection with the History of Ideas. Vol. 1–2]. Moskva, 1959. 1999–2000. (In Russ.)

21. Makeeva L.B. Iazyk, ontologiia i realism [Language, Onthology, and Realism]. Moskva, 2011. (In Russ.)

22. Neklassicheskoe nasledie. Andrei Poletaev / Otv. red. I.M. Savel'eva [Non-Classical Heritage. Andrei Poletayev / Ed. I.M. Savel'eva]. Moskva, 2011. (In Russ.)

23. Obshchaia istoriia Tserkvi. T. I–II / Sost. i obshch. red. V.V. Simonova [A General Church History. Vol. I–II / Comp., ed. V.V. Simonov]. Moskva, 2017. (In Russ.)

24. Pavlov A.V. Postpostmodernizm: kak sotsial'naia i kul'turnaia teorii ob’iasniaiut nashe vremia [Postmodernism: How Social and Cultural Theories Explain Our Times]. Moskva, 2019. (In Russ.)

25. Popper K. Logika i rost nauchnogo znaniia. Izbrannye raboty [The Logic of and Increase in Academic Knowledge: Selected Works]. Moskva, 1983. (In Russ.)

26. Russel B. Issledovanie znacheniia i istiny [An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth]. Moskva, 1999. (In Russ.)

27. Savel'eva I. M., Poletaev A. V. Istoriia i vremia. V poiskakh utrachennogo. [History and Time. In Search of the Lost]. Moskva, 1997. (In Russ.)

28. Savel'eva I.M., Poletaev A.V. Klassicheskoe nasledie [Classical Heritage]. Moskva, 2010. (In Russ.)

29. Savel'eva I.M., Poletaev A.V. Sotsiologiia znaniia o proshlom [Sociology of the Knowledge of the Past]. Moskva, 2005. (In Russ.)

30. Savel'eva I.M., Poletaev A.V. Znanie o proshlom: teoriia i istoriia. Vol. 1: Konstruirovanie proshlogo [The Knowledge of the Past: Theory and History. Vol. 1. Constructing the Past]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2003. (In Russ.)

31. Sobytie v istorii, pamiati i narrativakh identichnosti / Pod red. L.P. Repinoi [The Event in History, Memory and Narratives of Identity / Ed. L.P. Repina]. Moskva, 2017. (In Russ.)

32. Vizgin V.P. Epistemologiia Gastona Bashliara i istoriia nauki [Gaston Bachelard’s Epistemology and the History of Science]. Moskva, 1996. (In Russ.)

33. Vvedenie v istoriiu Tserkvi. Ch. 1: Obzor istochnikov po obshchei istorii Tserkvi / Pod red. V.V. Simonova [Introduction to Church History. Pt I: Review of the Sources on General Church History: Textbook / Ed. V.V. Simonova]. Moskva, 2012. (In Russ.)

34. Vvedenie v istoriiu Tserkvi. Ch. 2: Obzor istoriografii po obshchei istorii Tserkvi / Pod red. V.V. Simonova [Introduction to Church History. Pt II: Review of the Historiography on General Church History / Ed. V.V. Simonov]. Sankt-Peterburg, 2015. (In Russ.)

35. A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography / Ed. A. Tucker. Oxford, 2009.

36. Agamben G. The Kingdom and the Glory. For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government (Homo Sacer II, 2). Stanford, 2011.

37. Agamben G. The Signature of All Things. On Method. New York, 2009.

38. Historical Reenactment. From Realism to the Affective Turn / Eds. I. McCalman, P.A. Pickering. New York, 2010.

39. Kuhn T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago, 1996.

40. McCullagh B.C. The Logic of History. Putting postmodernism in perspective. London; New York, 2004.

41. McPartland T.J. Lonergan and Historiography. The Epistemological Philosophy of History. Columbia, 2010.

42. Mills C. The Philosophy of Agamben. Ithaca, 2008.

43. The Agamben Dictionary / Eds. A. Murray, J. Whyte. Edinburgh, 2011.

44. The Agamben Effect / Spec. ed. A. Ross // The South Atlantic Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 107. № 1.

45. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. / Ed. T.J. McDonald. Ann Arbor, 1996.

46. Warum noch Philosophie? Historische, systematische und gesellschaftliche Positionen / Hrsg. von M. van Ackeren, T. Kobusch, J. Müller. Berlin - Boston, 2011.