All
 
|
 
 


Botanical Garden as a Colonial Institution: V. M. Arnoldi About his Journey to Buitenzorg in 1909
 
PIIS013038640007609-7-1
DOI10.31857/S013038640007609-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Evgeniy Savitskiy 
Affiliation:
Institute of World History, RAS
Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameNovaia i noveishaia istoriia
EditionIssue 6
Pages49-64
Abstract

Vladimir Mitrofanovich Arnoldi, a Russian botanist, professor at the Kharkiv University, compiled notes on his research trip to the Buitezorg Botanical Garden in 1909, which allow to see how the Russian scientist perceived the colonial world of the Dutch India. As Arnoldi’s notes show, the Botanical Garden of that time was important not only as a scientific and economic institution, it was also endowed with various symbolic meanings, which combined scientific, aesthetic and political values. First of all, the botanical garden, regarded as a museum of past historical eras, allowed to build a single scheme of the natural development of peoples, which justifies the Dutch "cultural mission". The Botanical Garden also acts as an element of modern spectacular culture, offering images of outlandish and exotic. This does not prevent the simultaneous use of cultural approximation strategies, thanks to which the botanical garden organized according to the principles of neoclassical aesthetics turns out to be something like the Platonic garden of the Academy and the ideal city. Although Arnoldi notes some manifestations of injustice, the Buitenzorg Botanical Garden and the Dutch India in general appear to him as an example of rational government, and in this regard, special attention is paid to the image of Melchior Treub, the director of the garden. A comparison of the descriptions of the Botanical Garden by Arnoldi and in Garshin's story «Attalea princeps» allows us to see how scientific freedom and political responsibility, humanistic ideals and the requirements of scientific impartiality were correlated in Arnoldi's ideas. The colonial Botanical Garden is also important for Arnoldi in connection with reflections on the future of Russia, whose present situation seems to be tragic. Being generally pessimistic, Arnoldi, nevertheless, makes the beautiful botanical garden an allegory of a different Russia.

KeywordsBotanical garden, Buitenzorg, Netherlands India, Melchior Treub, Vladimir Mitrofanovich Arnoldi, Russia, aesthetic of nature, colonial history, imperial ideologies, history of Indonesia
Received22.11.2019
Publication date05.12.2019
Number of characters49309
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 894

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Alekseev L. V., Belyakova G. A., Poddubnaya-Arnol'di V. A. Vladimir Mitrofanovich Arnol'di (1871–1924). M., 2001.
2. Arnol'di V. M. Po ostrovam Malajskogo arkhipelaga: Vpechatleniya i nablyudeniya naturalista. M., 2014.
3. Bakunin M. M. Tropicheskaya Gollandiya: pyat' let na ostrove Yava. M., 2007.
4. Garshin V. M. Attalea princeps. – Garshin V. M. Rasskazy. L., 1978, c. 88-94.
5. Gumbol'dt A. Puteshestvie v ravnodenstvennye oblasti Novogo sveta v 1799–1804 gg.: ostrov Tenerife i Vostochnaya Venesuehla. M., 1963.
6. Dzherasi R. Okno na Vostok: imperiya, orientalizm, natsiya i religiya v Rossii. M., 2013.
7. Kondrashkina E. N. Strana i naselenie. – Indoneziya. Spravochnik. Otv. red. I. A. Simoniya. M., 1983, s. 4–39.
8. Kyuster Kh. Istoriya lesa: vzglyad iz Germanii. M., 2018.
9. Lupanova E. M. Istoriya zakreposcheniya prirodnogo resursa: lesnoe khozyajstvo v Rossii 1696–1802 gg. CPb., 2017.
10. Neizvestnyj Miklukho-Maklaj. Perepiska puteshestvennika s tsarstvuyuschim Domom Romanovykh, Ministerstvom inostrannykh del, Morskim ministerstvom i Imperatorskim Russkim Geograficheskim obschestvom. Sost. O. V. Karimov. M., 2014.
11. Savitskij E. E. Comalijskaya derevnya v peterburgskom Lunaparke v 1912 godu: istoriya i ee sovremennye interpretatsii. – Istoriya. Ehlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal. 2018, t. 9, vyp. 8 (72). https://history.jes.su/s207987840002442-5–1  (data obrascheniya 29.09.2019).
12. Said Eh. Orientalizm. M., 2006.
13. Tejlor Eh. Pervobytnaya kul'tura. M., 1939.
14. Chelovek i priroda: ehkologicheskaya istoriya. Pod red. D. Aleksandrova, F.-J. Bryuggemajera, Yu. Lajus. SPb., 2008.
15. Scherbatova O. A. V strane vulkanov: putevye zametki na Yave 1893 goda. M., 2009.
16. Ehjdel'man N. Ya. Pavel Ivanovich Bakhmetev (odna iz zagadok russkogo revolyutsionnogo dvizheniya). – Revolyutsionnaya situatsiya v Rossii v 1859–1861 gg., t. 4. M., 1965, s. 387–398.
17. Barnard T. P. Nature’s colony: Empire, nation and environment in the Singapore botanic Gardens. Singapore, 2017.
18. Brockway L. H. Science and colonial expansion: The role of the British Royal botanic gardens. New York, 1979.
19. Dreesbach A. Gezähmte Wilde: Die Zurschaustellung exotischer Menschen in Deutschland, 1870–1940. New York – Frankfurt a.M., 2005.
20. Emerit M. Les saints-simoniens en Algérie. Paris, 1941.
21. Mackenzie J. M. Museums and empire: Natural history, human cultures and colonial identities. Manchester, 2010.
22. Mintz S. W. Sweetness and power: The place of sugar in Modern history. London, 1985.
23. Mückler H. Kolonialismus in Ozeanien. Wien, 2012.
24. Pratt M. L. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London – New York, 1992.
25. Rappaport E. A Thirst for Empire. How Tea Shaped the Modern World. Princeton, 2017.
26. Schweighofer E. Vom Neandertal nach Afrika. Der Streit um den Ursprung der Menschheit im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Göttingen, 2018.
27. Taussig M. Palma africana. Chicago, 2018.
28. Wille R.-J. Mannen van de microsoop: De laboratoriumbiologie op veldtocht in Nederland en Indiyo, 1840–1910. Nijmegen, 2019.
29. Williamson F. Weathering the empire: meteorological research in the early British Straits settlements. – British journal for the history of science, 2015, v. 48, p. 475–492.
30. Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Ed.by J. Clifford, G. E. Marcus. Berkley – Los Angeles, 1986.
31. Writing, Travel, and Empire: In the Margins of Anthropology. Ed. by P. Hulme, R. McDougall. New York, 2007.
32. Zimmerman A. Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany. Chicago, 2001.
33. Zoo humains: Au temps des exhibitions humaines. Sous la dir. de N. Bancel, P. Blanchard, G. Boyotsch et al. Paris, 2004.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up