Number of purchasers: 6, views: 366
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Byman D., Waxman M. The Dynamics of Coercion: American Foreign Policy and the Limits of Military Might. Cambridge University Press, 2002. 261 p.
2. Schultz, Kenneth A. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 301 p.
3. Sperandei M. Bridging Deterrence and Compellence: An Alternative Approach to the Study of Coercive Diplomacy. International Studies Review, 2006, no. 8, pp. 253-280.
4. George A. Forceful Persuasion. Diplomacy as an Alternative to War. Washington, D.C., United States Institute of Peace Press, 1991. 95 p.
5. Lauren P.G., Hall D.K., Sagan S.D., Zimmerman T. The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy: Second Edition. Avalon Publishing, 1994. 310 p.
6. Kardaş Ş. Understanding Turkey’s coercive diplomacy. German Marshall Fund paper, 2020, no. 7. Available at: https://www.gmfus.org/publications/understanding-turkeys-coercive-diplomacy (accessed 20.03.2023).
7. Jentleson B. Coercive Diplomacy: Scope and Limits in the Contemporary World. The Stanley Foundation, 2006. 12 p. Available at: https://stanleycenter.org/publications/pab/pab06CoerDip.pdf (accessed 20.03.2023).
8. Filmus E. Sticks and Carrots in Coercive Diplomacy: Toward a Theory of Inducements. Diss. The University of Chicago, 2015. 43 p. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/21783586/Sticks_and_Carrots_in_Coercive_Diplomacy_Toward_a_Theory_of_Inducements (accessed 20.03.2023).
9. Madalane T.P. EU DCFTAs: Carrot-and-Stick. Vig Z., ed. Challenges of international trade and investment in the 21st century. Ankara, Chișinău, Szeged, 2022, рp. 83-107. Available at: http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/25704/1/Challengesofinternationaltrade.pdf (accessed 20.03.2023).
10. Stepanova Е.A. Peace Process: On Substantive Definition. World Economy and International Relations, 2022, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 5-18. (In Russ.) Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2022-66-9-5-18
11. Shtanski N.V., Palamarchuk D.N., Kambur D.N. Workbook “Blockade of Transnistria: survival instead of development. All the way between two fires.” Media Center “Eurasian Transnistria”. Bendery, 2014. 56 p. (In Russ.)
12. Prohnitchi V., Lupusor A. Transnistria and the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area: a Little Stone That Overturns a Great Wain? Expert-Group Centru Analitic Independent, 12.03.2013. Available at: http://www.expert-grup.org/en/biblioteca/item/791 (accessed 20.03.2023).
13. Konończuk W., Rodkiewicz W. Could Transnistria block Moldova’s integration with the EU? Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia, 23.10.2013. Available at: http://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2012-10-23/could-transnistria-block-moldovas-integration-eu (accessed 20.03.2023).
14. Lupushor A. Five myths about the Association Agreement with the European Union. Centru Analytic Independent, 19.11.2013. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.expert-grup.org/ro/activitate/item/882 (accessed 20.03.2023).
15. Calus K. The DCFTA in Transnistria: Who Gains? New Eastern Europe, 2016. Available at: http://neweasterneurope.eu/articles-and-commentary/1861-the-dcfta-in-transnistriawho-gains (accessed 20.03.2023).
16. De Waal T. Uncertain Ground: Engaging with Europe’s De Facto States and Breakaway Territories. Carnegie, Washington, D.C., 2018. 98 p. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/deWaal_UncertainGround_final.pdf (accessed 20.03.2023).
17. Beyer J., Wolff S. Linkage and Leverage Effects on Moldova’s Transnistria Problem. East European Politics, 2015, no. 32 (3), pp. 335-354. DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1124092
18. Secrieru S. Transnistria Zig-zagging towards a DCFTA. PISM Policy Paper, no. 145, 2016. Available at: https://www.europeansources.info/record/transnistria-zig-zagging-towards-a-dcfta/ (accessed 20.03.2023).
19. Paul I. Transnistria – Where to? European Policy Center, Policy Brief, 13.03.2014. Available at: https://dcfta.md/uploads/0/images/large/transnistria-where-to.pdf (accessed 20.03.2023).
20. Kemoklidze N., Wolff S. Trade as a Confidence-Building Measure in Protracted Conflicts: The Cases of Georgia and Moldova Compared. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2020, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 305-332. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2019.1702567
21. Kosienkowski M. The patron–client relationship between Russia and Transnistria. Hoch T., Kopeček V., eds. De Facto States in Eurasia. Abingdon, Routledge, 2019, рp. 183-207. DOI: 10.4324/9780429244049-14
22. Gumene V. DCFTA’s Implications for Foreign Trade of the Transnistrian Region. Center for European Policy Studies. Policy Brief, 2019. Available at: https://3dcftas.eu/publications/dcfta’s-implications-for-foreign-trade-of-the-transnistrian-region (accessed 20.03.2023).
23. Shevchuk N.V. ‘Small steps’ approach to conflict settlement. The case of Transnistria. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy, 2022, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 38-54. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17994/IT.2022.20.1.68.1
24. Fisher R., Ury W. Getting to Yes: How to Reach Agreement without Giving In. London: Hutchinson, 1982. 163 p.
25. Istomin I., Bolgova I. Transnistrian Strategy in the Context of Russian–Ukrainian Relations: The Rise and Failure of ‘Dual Alignment’. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 2016, no. 16 (1), pp. 169-94. DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2016.1148412