All
 
|
 
 


Non-Western Theories of Development in the Global Capitalism Era
 
PIIS013122270015003-4-1
DOI10.20542/0131-2227-2021-65-4-113-122
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Denis Degterev 
Occupation: Head, Department of Theory and History of International Relations, RUDN University; Associate Lecturer, World Economy Department, MGIMO University, MFA of Russia
Affiliation:
RUDN University
MGIMO University
St. Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameMirovaia ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia
EditionVolume 65 Issue 4
Pages113-122
Abstract

This article is devoted to the evolution of non-Western theories of development in the epoch of global capitalism, i.e. after 1990. It describes in detail what is meant by this concept – models of socio-economic development, alternative to the Western neoliberal paradigm and associated with the modernization of non-Western countries, primarily in the “Global South”. Periodization of these approaches is given in connection with the process of decolonization (early 1960s), the end of the bipolar world, and the strengthening of China (since 2010s). Two main directions of such theories – neo-Marxian tradition, as well as post-colonial and anti-colonial studies – are shown. The author concludes that the “non-Westernness” of post-colonial studies is conditional, while anti-colonial and neo-Marxian studies are very much intertwined. The article shows the role of such organizations as CODESRIA and Third World Network in shaping the intellectual development agenda of the Global South. It traces the evolution of neo-Marxist approaches to development of the poorest countries, which originated in Latin American structuralism, American neo-Marxism, the works of J. Galtung and W. Rodney. By the early 1980s, the world-systemic approach was already dominant, its representatives were relatively capable to explain the collapse of the socialist system, and also made attempts to describe the growing influence of China. Nevertheless, the theory of the transnational capitalist class that emerged in the 1990s and 2000s was more successful from this point of view. The article investigates the phenomenon of an emerging confrontation between China and the United States in the ideological field – for the influence on leftist intellectuals around the world, and shows the main resources of both sides in this conflict. Special attention is paid to Postdevelopmentalism that developed in the 1990–2000s in line with postmodernist approaches; both strengths and weaknesses of this concept are presented. In conclusion, the author summarizes that neo-Marxist approaches play a key role as the major alternative to neoliberal capitalist development in the countries of the “Global South” while national modernization theories are lacking in the non-Western countries.

Keywordsdevelopment, modernization, Global South, non-Western theories, postcolonial studies, neo-Marxism, dependency theories, world-system theories, transnational capitalism, social movements, post-development
AcknowledgmentThe article has been prepared at RUDN University and supported by a grant of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR). Project no. 19-111-50655 (Expansion) “Non-Western Theories of Development in the Age of Global Capitalism”. The author also expresses his sincere gratitude to P. Bond (University of the Western Cape, South Africa), T.M. Gavristova (YarSU), E.N. Grachikov (RUDN University), Li Yan (CASS, China) and V.G. Shubin (Institute for African Studies, RAS) for their valuable comments.
Publication date11.05.2021
Number of characters31597
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

Table of contents

К ТРАКТОВКЕ И ПЕРИОДИЗАЦИИ
О "НЕЗАПАДНОСТИ" ПОСТКОЛОНИАЛИЗМА
ОТ ТЕОРИЙ ЗАВИСИМОСТИ К ТРАНСНАЦИОНАЛЬНОМУ КАПИТАЛИЗМУ
"МОНОПОЛИЯ НА МАРКСИЗМ" В НОВОЙ БИПОЛЯРНОСТИ
ПОСТДЕВЕЛОПМЕНТАЛИЗМ
1 В современной отечественной литературе достаточно много эмпирических исследований, посвященных развитию отдельных регионов и стран Азии, Африки и Латинской Америки. Куда более редкими являются работы по переосмыслению теорий и моделей развития, сложившихся в этих странах. В связи с этим стоит отметить монографии, вышедшие еще в советский период: Института Африки "Идейные течения в Тропической Африке" [1]; Института философии по идеологии неоколониализма [2]; труды ИМЭМО – "Проблемы индустриализации развивающихся стран" [3], "Общественная мысль развивающихся стран" [4], а также серию из пяти книг "Экономика и политика развивающихся стран", изданную в 1970–1980-е годы.
2 На современном этапе исследования моделей развития проводятся в Центре проблем модернизации и развития ИМЭМО РАН под руководством В.Г. Хороса, опубликовавшим две обобщающие монографии по итогам научного семинара [5, 6]. C 2018 г. постоянный научный семинар по незападным теориям международных отношений (ТМО) проводится в РУДН. В МГИМО вышла обобщающая работа под редакцией А.Д. Воскресенского по незападным теориям политической модернизации [7], а также монография "Юг: путь к экономической независимости" [8]. Оригинальные подходы представлены в серии очерков по политарному ("азиатскому") способу производства Ю.И. Семенова [9] и в трудах профессора ИСАА МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова В.А. Мельянцева [10].
3 Важным шагом для развития российской общественной науки стал выход на русском языке всех томов фундаментального исследования И. Валлерстайна "Мир-система модерна", включая четвертый том [11], а также других классических работ по проблематике развития, например монографии Э. Райнерта [12]. Публикации ряда авторов из России также появились в ведущих мировых научных изданиях. Знаковое в этой связи – интервью Б.Ю. Кагарлицкого журналу "Третий мир" – лидирующему по тематике "Глобальный Юг" [13]. Тем не менее включенность РФ в международный научный дискурс по незападным теориям развития пока оставляет желать лучшего, что и призвана, хотя бы частично, устранить статья.
4

К ТРАКТОВКЕ И ПЕРИОДИЗАЦИИ
5 Незападные теории развития – это достаточно амбивалентное понятие. С одной стороны, это модели социально-экономического развития, альтернативные западной неолиберальной парадигме. Основной принципиальной (радикальной) альтернативой западной модели был и остается неомарксизм1 (продукт западной общественной мысли), хотя влияние его и содержание на разных этапах существенно меняется. С другой – это модели социально-экономического развития, разрабатываемые за пределами западного мира, включая страны "Глобального Юга", а также исследователями незападного происхождения, но интегрированными в западные академические круги (постколониальные исследования). 1. Ряд исследователей, в том числе В.Г. Шубин (Институт Африки РАН), скептически относятся к данному термину, предпочитая говорить о современном марксизме.
6 Вторая "дихотомия" связана с различием между сугубо академическими исследованиями, ведущимися в целом ряде стран мира как группами (центры, сети), так и отдельными учеными, и реализацией данных подходов на практике. Последнее характерно лишь для небольшого круга стран – КНР, Вьетнам, Куба, Северная Корея, Венесуэла. В то же время широкое распространение получили движения политических активистов, например Всемирный социальный форум.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 1337

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Yablochkov L.D., Kremen' K.S., red. Idejnye techeniya v Tropicheskoj Afrike. Moskva, Nauka, 1969. 227 s. [Yablochkov L.D., Kremen’ K.S., eds. Ideinye techeniya v Tropicheskoi Afrike [Ideological Currents in Tropical Africa]. Moscow, Nauka, 1969. 227 p.]
2. Kritika ideologii i politiki neokolonializma. Moskva, Nauka, 1984. 256 s. [Critique of Neocolonialism Ideology and Politics. Moscow, Nauka, 1984. 256 p. (In Russ.)]
3. Problemy industrializatsii razvivayuschikhsya stran. Moskva, Mysl', 1971. 408 s. [Industrialization Problems in Developing Countries. Moscow, Mysl’, 1971. 408 p. (In Russ.)]
4. Majdanik K.L., otv. red. Obschestvennaya mysl' razvivayuschikhsya stran. Moskva, Nauka, 1988. 344 s. [Maidanik K.L., ed. Obshchestvennaya mysl' razvivayushchikhsya stran [Social Concepts of Developing Countries]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988. 344 p.]
5. Khoros V.G., red. Sovremennye problemy razvitiya. Materialy teoreticheskogo seminara v IMEhMO RAN. Moskva, IMEhMO RAN, 2010. 284 s. [Khoros V.G., ed. Sovremennye problemy razvitiya. Materialy teoreticheskogo seminara v IMEMO RAN [Modern problems of development. Materials of the theoretical seminar at IMEMO RAN]. Moscow, IMEMO, 2010. 284 p.]
6. Khoros V.G., red. Sovremennye problemy razvitiya. Materialy teoreticheskogo seminara v IMEhMO RAN. Vyp. II. T.1. Moskva, IMEhMO RAN, 2016. 412 s. [Khoros V.G., ed. Sovremennye problemy razvitiya. Materialy teoreticheskogo seminara v IMEMO RAN [Modern problems of development. Materials of the theoretical seminar at IMEMO RAS]. Iss. 2. Vol. 1. Moscow, IMEMO, 2016. 412 p.]
7. Voskresenskij A.D., red. Vostok i politika: Politicheskie sistemy, politicheskie kul'tury, politicheskie protsessy. Moskva, Aspekt Press, 2015. 624 s. [Voskresensky A.D., ed. Vostok i politika: Politicheskie sistemy, politicheskie kul'tury, politicheskie protsessy [East and Politics: Political Systems, Political Cultures, Political Processes]. Moscow, Aspect Press, 2015. 624 p.]
8. Zakharov A.N., Bulatov A.S., red. Yug: put' k ehkonomicheskoj nezavisimosti. Moskva, MGIMO-Universitet, 2019. 324 s. [Zakharov A.N., Bulatov A.S., eds. Yug: put' k ekonomicheskoi nezavisimosti [South: the Way to Economic Independence]. Moscow, MGIMO-Universitet, 2019. 324 p.]
9. Semenov Yu.I. Politarnyj ("aziatskij") sposob proizvodstva. Suschnost' i mesto v istorii chelovechestva i Rossii. Filosofsko-istoricheskie ocherki. Moskva, Lenand, 2019. 376 s. [Semenov Yu.I. Politarnyi ("aziatskii") sposobproizvodstva. Sushchnost' i mesto v istorii chelovechestva i Rossii. Filosofsko-istoricheskie ocherki [Politarian ("Asian") Method of Production. The Essence and Place in Human and Russian history. Philosophical and Historical Essays]. Moscow, Lenand, 2019. 376 p.]
10. Mel'yantsev V.A., Matyunina L.Kh. Ocherki makroehkonomicheskogo i finansovogo razvitiya stran Vostoka i Zapada (1980–2010-e gody). Moskva, Klyuch-S, 2019. 192 s. [Melyantsev V.A., Matyunina L.Kh. Ocherki makroekonomicheskogo i finansovogo razvitiya stran Vostoka i Zapada (1980–2010-e gody) [Essays on Macroeconomic and Financial Development of the Countries of East and West (1980s–2010s)]. Moscow, Klyuch-S, 2019. 192 p.]
11. Wallerstein I. The Modern World-System IV: Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914. Berkley, University of California Press, 2011. 396 p.
12. Reinert E.S. How Rich Countries Got Rich… And Why Poor Countries Stay Poor. London, Constable, 2008. 398 p.
13. Gills B. Interview with Boris Kagarlitsky. Third World Quarterly, 2016, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 744-748. DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1128818
14. Leech M. What is Development Studies? The British Academy, February 20, 2020. Available at: https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/blog/what-is-development-studies/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIqJT_m-nB6QIVC08YCh14KwmkEAAYASAAEgKpyPD_BwE (accessed 10.08.2020).
15. Fanon F. The Wretched of the Earth. New York, Grove Weidenfeld, 1963. 250 p.
16. Campbell H.G. African International Relations, Genocidal Histories and the Emancipatory Project. Part 1. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2020, vol. 20, no. 1, pp.115-130. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-1-115-130
17. Buzgalin A.V., Voejkov M.I., red. Marks posle Marksa: Postsovetskaya shkola kriticheskogo marksizma. Moskva, Lenand, 2019. 568 s. [Buzgalin A.V., Voeikov M.I., eds. Marks posle Marksa: Postsovetskaya shkola kriticheskogo marksizma [Marx after Marx: Post-Soviet School of Critical Marxism]. Moscow, Lenand, 2019. 568 p.]
18. Ehjfari A.K. Razvivayuschiesya strany i "Kapital" K. Marksa. Moskva, RUDN, 2019. 303 s. [Eifari A.K. Razvivayushchiesya strany i "Kapital" K. Marksa [Developing Countries and the "Capital" by K. Marx]. Moscow, RUDN, 2019. 303 p.]
19. Peet R., Hartwick E., eds. Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives. New York, The Guilford Press, 2009. 324 p.
20. Gavristova T.M. Afrika: "postkolonial'naya biblioteka". Aziya i Afrika segodnya, 2020, № 3, ss. 80-85. [Gavristova T.M. Afrika: "postkolonial'naya biblioteka" [Afrika: "Post-Colonial Library"]. Asia and Africa Today, 2020, no. 3, pp. 80-85.] DOI: 10.31857/S032150750008720-4
21. Easterly W. The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists' Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics. Cambridge, MITPress, 2001. 400 p.
22. Degterev D. Politicheskaya ehkonomiya mezhdunarodnoj pomoschi. Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2014, № 4, cc. 26-35. [Degterev D. Politicheskaya ehkonomiya mezhdunarodnoi pomoshchi [Political Economy of Foreign Aid]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2014, no. 4, pp. 26-35.]
23. Moyo D. Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa. New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2009. 208 p.
24. Ndikumana L., Boyce J.K. Africa's Odious Debts: How Foreign Loans and Capital Flight Bled a Continent (African Arguments). London, Zed Books, 2011. 152 p.
25. Prashad V. Poorer Nations: A Possible History of the Global South. London, Verso Books, 2012. 304 p.
26. Grachikov E.N. Stanovlenie kitajskoj shkoly mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij: analiticheskie podkhody i metody issledovanij. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2019, t. 19, № 2, ss. 187-200. [Grachikov E.N. Stanovlenie kitaiskoi shkoly mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: analiticheskie podkhody i metody issledovanii [Formation of the Chinese School of International Relations: Analytical Approaches and Research Methods]. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2019, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 187-200.] DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-2-187-200
27. Deklaratsiya ob ustanovlenii novogo mezhdunarodnogo ehkonomicheskogo poryadka. Prinyata rezolyutsiej 3201 (S-VI) General'noj Assamblei OON ot 1 maya 1974 goda. [Declaration on the Establishment of a New International Economic order. Resolution 3201 (S-VI) of UN GA, May 1, 1974 (In Russ.)] Available at: https://undocs.org/A/RES/3201 (S-VI) (accessed 10.08.2020).
28. CODERSRIA Tribute – Samir Amin (1931–2018): A Titan has Gone Home to Rest. CODESRIA, 2018. Available at: https://codesria.org/spip.php?article2870&lang=en  (accessed 10.08.2020).
29. Khor M. The “Singapore Issues” in the WTO: Evolution and Implications for Developing Countries. Penang, Third World Network, 2007. 65 p.
30. Rodney W. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. London, Bogle-L'Ouverture Publications, 1972. 316 p.
31. Galtung J. A Structural Theory of Imperialism. Journal of Peace Research, 1971, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 81-117. DOI: 10.1177/002234337100800201
32. Sears D., ed. Dependency Theory: A Critical Reassessment. London, Pinter, 1981. 211 p.
33. Kvangraven I.H., Styve M.D., Kufakurinani U., Frutuoso S., eds. Dialogues on Development. Volume 1: Dependency. New York, Institute for New Economic Thinking, 2017. 112 p.
34. Tausch A. Globalisation and Development: The Relevance of Classical “Dependency” Theory for the World Today. International Social Science Journal, 2010, vol. 61, no. 202, pp. 467-488. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01786.x
35. Amin S. Capitalism in the Age of Globalization. London, Zed Press, 2014. 192 p.
36. Arrighi G. Adam Smith in Bejing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. New York, Verso, 2007. 418 p.
37. Frank A. ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1998. 416 p.
38. Rakhmanov A.B. Kontseptsiya transnatsional'nogo kapitalisticheskogo klassa v zapadnoj sotsial'noj mysli kontsa XX i nachala XXI veka (podkhody L. Sklyara, U. Robinsona i Dzh. Kharrisa). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya, 2015, № 2, ss. 98-114. [Rakhmanov A.B. Kontseptsiya transnatsional'nogo kapitalisticheskogo klassa v zapadnoi sotsial'noi mysli kontsa XX i nachala XXI veka (podkhody L. Sklyar, W. Robinson i J. Harris [The Conception of the Transnational Capitalist Class in the Social in the Late 20th and the Early 21st Centuries (Perpespectives of L. Sklyar, W. Robinson and J. Harris)]. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 2015, no. 2, pp. 98-114.]
39. Massad J. How the US Empire Stole the Left's Ideas. Middle East Eye, January 17, 2020. Available at: https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/us-and-new-imperial-order  (accessed 10.08.2020).
40. Taylor I. Sixty Years Later: Africa’s Stalled Decolonization. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2020, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 39-53. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-1-39-53
41. Bond P. The BRICS’ Centrifugal Geopolitical Economy. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2018, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 535-549. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2018-18-3-535-549
42. Norton B., Blumenthal M. DSA/Jacobin/Haymarket-sponsored ‘Socialism’ Conference Features US Gov-Funded Regime-Change Activists. The Gray Zone, July 6, 2019. Available at: https://thegrayzone.com/2019/07/06/dsa-jacobin-iso-socialism-conference-us-funded-regime-change/  (accessed 10.08.2020).
43. Zhikui Z. Introduction to Socialism with Chinese Characteristics. Linden, Prunus Press, Bejing, Bejing Publishing Group, 2016. 284 p.
44. Voskresenskij A.D., red. Model' razvitiya sovremennogo Kitaya: otsenki, diskussii, prognozy. Moskva, Strategicheskie izyskaniya, 2019. 736 s. [Voskresensky A.D., ed. Model' razvitiya sovremennogo Kitaya: otsenki, diskussii, prognozy [The Development Model of Modern China: Estimates, Discussions, Forecasts]. Moscow, Strategicheskie izyskaniya, 2019. 736 p.]
45. Vinogradov A.V., Degterev D.A., Spirina D.V., Trusova A.A. "Pekinskij konsensus" v mezhdunarodnom i vnutrikitajskom politicheskom diskurse. Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka, 2018, № 3, cc. 17-28. [Vinogradov A.V., Degterev D.A., Spirina D.V., Trusova A.A. "Pekinskii konsensus" v mezhdunarodnom i vnutrikitaiskom politicheskom diskurse [Beijing Consensus" in the International and Domestic Chinese Political Discourse]. Far Eastern Affairs, 2018, no. 3, pp. 17-28.]
46. Degterev D.A. Multipolar World Order: Old Myths and New Realities. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 2019, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 404-419. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-3-404-419
47. Gereffi G. Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus world. Review of International Political Economy, 2014, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 9-37. DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2012.756414
48. Klein E., Morreo C.E., eds. Postdevelopment in Practice. Alternatives, Economies, Ontologies. London, Routledge, 2019. 350 p.
49. Rahnema M., Bawtree V., eds. The Postdevelopment Reader. London, Zed Books, 1997. 464 p.
50. Wiarda H.J., ed. Non-Western Theories of Development. Regional Norms versus Global Trends. Fort Worth, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1999. 180 p.
51. Escobar A. Encountering Development: the Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1995. 312 p.
52. Chevalier J.M., Buckles D. Participatory Action Research: Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry. London, Routledge, 2013. 496 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203107386
53. QS World University Ranking by Subject, 2019. Development Studies. Available at: https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2019/development-studies  (accessed 10.08.2020).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up