On the prospects of comparative judicial law

The subject of this study is to determine the prospects for using the comparative legal method in judicial law. The article is divided into two parts. In the first, the author attempts to concretize the concept of "judicial law" and substantiate his vision of this concept. The second one examines promising areas of using the comparative legal method in the study of issues of judicial power and the organization of justice.

The author proceeds from a rather limited subject of judicial law as a scientific field. It includes fundamental issues of the development of judicial institutions and the organization of justice. At the same time, the idea of the unity of the process, which is associated with the historical emergence of the concept of judicial law, is considered by the author as no longer relevant. However, the theses put forward by Russian scientists on judicial and organizational legal relations that develop outside the regulation of procedural law, but are directly related to the administration of justice, have a significant perspective.

The article shows that the use of the comparative method in judicial law is objectively necessary and allows us to identify general patterns of development of judicial systems, the most promising approaches to regulating judicial and organizational relations and to determine the possibilities of using foreign experience in the development of national judicial institutions. For Russia at the present stage, the analysis of the practice of international courts (primarily the European Court of Human Rights) in cases of violation by foreign states of the right to a fair trial of specific applicants is of particular relevance.

Keywords

Received

01.02.2024

Publication date

04.03.2024

Cite

GOST	On the prospects of comparative judicial law // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law – 2023. – Articles_JZZSP_2023-2024 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://jzsp.jes.su/S199132220029819-6-1 (circulation date: 25.07.2024). DOI: 10.61205/S199132220029819-6
MLA	, "On the prospects of comparative judicial law." Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law 0 (2023) DOI: 10.61205/S199132220029819-6
APA	(2023). On the prospects of comparative judicial law. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law (0) DOI: 10.61205/S199132220029819-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Argunov A.V. Prostranstvo pravosudiya. M.: ID «Gorodets», 2021. 352 s.

2. Berestnev Yu.Yu. Yurisdiktsionnyj konflikt vlastej Pol'shi i evropejskikh sudebnykh organov // Byulleten' Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka. Rossijskoe izdanie. 2022. № 1. S. 154 - 159.

3. Bushtets N.V. Organizatsiya deyatel'nosti suda s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedatelej. Diss. … k.yu.n. M., 2022. 271 s.

4. Gadzhiev Kh.I. Sblizhenie pravovykh sistem: rol' mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2022. № 8. S. 130.

5. Davtyan A. G. Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo Germanii. M.: Gorodets-izdat, 2000. 320 s.;

6. Eliseev N. G. Grazhdanskoe protsessual'noe pravo zarubezhnykh stran: uchebnik. 2e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Prospekt, 2004. 602 s.

7. Kovler A. I. Antropologiya prav cheloveka v tsifrovuyu ehpokhu (opyt sravnitel'nogo analiza) // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2022. T. 26. № 12. S. 5—29.

8. Kovler A. I., Kosheleva E. V. Sravnitel'no-pravovoj metod v aktakh Venetsianskoj komissii // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2022. T. 18. № 4. S. 102—112.

9. Kuznetsova I.S. Kvazisudebnye parlamentarnye protsedury lisheniya sud'i statusa v Rossii i Soedinyonnykh Shtatakh Ameriki // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2022. № 2 (147). S. 88–104.

10. Lazarev V. V., Gadzhiev Kh. I. Osnovnye istochniki (formy) sudebnogo prava // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2022. T. 26. № 9. S. 5—22.

11. Marchenko M. N. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie. M.: Prospekt, 2015. 784 s.;

12. Meditsinskoe pravo: uchebnik. Pod red. A.A. Mokhova M.: Norma, 2017. 336 s.;

13. Mikhajlova E.V. Notarial'noe pravo kak samostoyatel'naya otrasl' rossijskogo prava // Notarius. 2023. № 3. S. 12 - 16.

14. Mikhajlovskij I.V. Sudebnoe pravo kak samostoyatel'naya yuridicheskaya nauka // Pravo. 1908. № 32. St. 54. 16 s.

15. Murad'yan Eh.M. Sudebnoe pravo (v kontekste trekh protsessual'nykh kodeksov). M.: Prospekt, 2003. 128 s.

16. Nagiev R.S., Nekhajchik V.K. Edinstvo protsessa kak printsip formirovaniya sovremennogo administrativno-protsessual'nogo prava // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2020. № 8. S. 136-140.

17. Osminin B. I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo, pravo vneshnikh snoshenij i kontseptsiya «sravnitel'nogo mezhdunarodnogo prava» // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2021. T. 25. № 2. S. 145—159.

18. Polyanskij N.N. Voprosy teorii sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. M., 1956. 271 s.

19. Polyanskij N.N., Strogovich M.S., Savitskij V.M., Mel'nikov A.A. Problemy sudebnogo prava. M.: Nauka, 1983. 219 s.

20. Puchinskij V. K. Grazhdanskij protsess zarubezhnykh stran. M.: Zertsalo, 2008. 520 s.;

21. Reshetnikova I. V. Dokazatel'stvennoe pravo Anglii i SShA. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo UrGYuA, 1997. 240 s.;

22. Ryazanovskij V.A. Edinstvo protsessa. Vstup. st.: Treushnikov M.K. M.: Gorodets, 1996 (pereizdanie raboty 1924 g.). 74 c.

23. Saidov A. Kh., Tumanov V. A. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie. M.: Yurist', 2003. 448 s.

24. Sovremennye kontseptsii verkhovenstva prava i pravovogo gosudarstva: sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie: monografiya / otv. red. T.Ya. Khabrieva, A.I. Kovler. M.: IZiSP pri Pravitel'stve RF, Norma, INFRA-M, 2024. 416 s.

25. Sokolov T.V. Unifikatsiya rossijskogo protsessual'nogo prava i vozrozhdenie kontseptsii rossijskogo protsessual'nogo prava // Obrazovanie i pravo. 2020. № 10. S. 186-194

26. Sokolov T.V. Formy vzaimosvyazi konstitutsionnogo i ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstv v kontekste doktriny sudebnogo prava. Diss. … k.yu.n. Sankt-Peterburg, 2014. 441 s.

27. Strogovich M.S. O sisteme nauki sudebnogo prava // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1939. № 3. S. 55-70.

28. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Kurs sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. M.: Norma, 1996. 432 s.;

29. Fokin E. A. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v sfere grazhdanskogo protsessual'nogo prava: predmet, tseli i perspektivy // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2018. № 3. S. 152-160.

30. Fokin E.A. Dostupnost' pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom protsesse: teoreticheskie osnovy i prakticheskaya realizatsiya: monografiya / M.: Statut, 2023. 330 c/

31. Fokin E.A. Ehvolyutsiya pozitsij Venetsianskoj komissii o nezavisimosti sudebnoj vlasti // Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya. 2022. № 3. S. 95-106

32. Tsifrovoe pravo: uchebnik / pod obsch. red. V. V. Blazheeva, M. A. Egorovoj. M.: Prospekt, 2020. 640 s.;

33. Chirkin V. E. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie: uchebnik dlya magistratury. 2e izdanie. M.: Norma, 2023. 320 s.