The court's decision on the transfer of the creditor's rights to another person

 
PIIS160565900031396-9-1
DOI10.61205/S160565900031396-9
Publication type Article
Status Approved
Authors
Affiliation: Novosibirsk state University of Economics and management
Address: Russian Federation, Novosibirsk
Abstract

The law may provide for circumstances in which the creditor's rights are transferred to another person. In particular, the rights of the creditor under the obligation are transferred to another person on the basis of the law by a court decision on the transfer of rights, if the possibility of such transfer is excluded from the law.

Using formal, logical and systematic research methods, the author examines in detail the cases of a court ruling on the transfer of the creditor's rights to another person, including when exercising pre-emptive authority to acquire property and when fulfilling a voluntary obligation to cede the right. At the same time, it proves that the studied translation of law relates to the administration of justice in a pre-contractual dispute, notable for the fact that the will of the parties is considered to be committed only in the presence of a judicial act. The court's decision is endowed with the qualities of an element of the legal composition that gives rise to the desired legal consequences, namely, an external change in the obligation.

The so-called «constitutive theory» of the exercise of preemptive right has been criticized. According to the author, this theory does not take into account that the violated preemptive power is protected by one of two transformative lawsuits – on compulsion to renounce the contract (compulsory succession) or on compulsory redemption of property rights. The court's decision on the first claim leads to an external change in the obligation, since the second is brought in the event of termination of the contract under which the property right was acquired, forcibly redeemed under another contract.

According to the results of the study, it was concluded that the norm of subclause 2 of clause 1 of Article 387 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation is designed for two groups of cases of singular succession: 1) the court makes a decision on the claim for the fulfillment of the obligation arising from the law to conclude an agreement on the assignment of rights; 2) the court's decision by virtue of the law is necessary for the fulfillment of a voluntarily accepted obligation to assign the right. In these cases, the court decision produces a transformative effect, being an element of the legal composition, entailing an external change in the legal relationship.

Keywordssingular succession; change of persons in the obligation; transfer of the right by virtue of the law; preemptive right (competence)
Received25.06.2024
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

1. 1. Брагинский М.И., Витрянский В.В. Договорное право. Кн. 1. Об-щие положения. М.: Статут, 2020. 847 с. 2. Витоль Э.Ю. Природа ответственности цедента (часть вторая) // Вестник гражданского права. 2017. № 5. С. 85-123. 3. Гражданский кодекс Российской Федерации. Постатейный коммен-тарий к разделу III «Общая часть обязательного права» / Под ред. Л.В. Санниковой. М.: Статут, 2016. 621 с. 4. Договорное и обязательственное право (общая часть): постатей-ный комментарий к статьям 307-453 Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации / Отв. ред. А.Г. Карапетов. М.: М-Логос, 2017. 1120 с. 5. Комментарий к Гражданскому кодексу Российской Федерации, ча-сти первой (постатейный) / Под ред. О.Н. Садикова. М.: КОНТРАКТ, ИН-ФРА-М, 2005. 1061 с. 6. Комментарий к Гражданскому кодексу Российской Федерации. Часть первая. Учебно-практический комментарий (постатейный) / Под ред. А.П. Сергеева. М.: Проспект, 2010. 891 с. 7. Новоселова Л.А. Преимущественное право приобретения акций в закрытом акционерном обществе // Арбитражная практика. 2004. № 4. С. 3-14. 8. Постатейный комментарий к Гражданскому кодексу Российской Федерации, части первой / Под ред. П.В. Крашенинникова. М.: Статут, 2011. 1325 с. 9. Перемена лиц в обязательстве и ответственность за нарушение обязательства: комментарий к статьям 330-333, 380-381, 382-406.1 Граж-данского кодекса Российской Федерации / Отв. ред. А.Г. Карапетов. М.: М-Логос, 2022. 1188 с. 10. Скловский К.И. Применение законодательства о собственности. Трудные вопросы. Комментарий Постановления Пленума ВС РФ № 10, Пленума ВАС РФ № 22 от 29 апреля 2010 г., Постановления Пленума ВАС РФ от 11 июля 2011 г. № 54, информационного письма Президиума ВАС РФ от 15 января 2013 г. № 153. М.: Статут, 2014. 205 с. 11. Чупрунов И.С. К вопросу о конструкции преимущественного права покупки доли (акций) // Вестник гражданского права. 2020. № 4. С. 95-219.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up