All
 
|
 
 


About the Possibility of Copyright Protection of Objects Generated by Artificial Intelligence Systems
 
PIIS160565900027569-9-1
DOI10.61205/S160565900027569-9
Publication type Article
Status Approved
Authors
Anton Gurko 
Occupation: Senior Lecturer at the Department of Civil Law Disciplines
Affiliation: PRUE
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow, Stremyanny lane, 36
Abstract

In recent years, many computer programs have appeared that operate on the basis of artificial intelligence systems, which are designed to generate various types of content and are distributed to a wide range of users. Therefore, more and more objects generated by artificial intelligence systems, similar in their characteristics to protected results of intellectual activity, are being distributed on the Internet. The fact that such objects are generated automatically by a computer program does not allow them to be subject to legal protection in accordance with Part 4 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation due to the lack of authors. At the same time, significant funds are being invested in the creation of new artificial intelligence systems, which determines the need to protect the interests of persons involved in the creation and use of artificial intelligence systems. At the same time, there is no consensus in the scientific literature about the possibility or impossibility of protecting such objects, as well as the principles and contours of their legal protection.

In this regard, the author conducted a study in order to formulate the basic principles of legal protection of objects generated by artificial intelligence systems. To achieve this goal, the author has formulated the following tasks: to summarize existing approaches to solving the issue of legal protection of objects generated by artificial intelligence systems, to identify their shortcomings, to determine the presence or absence of elements of human creativity in working with artificial intelligence systems, to determine the optimal regime for the protection of objects generated by artificial intelligence systems .

The study was conducted using general scientific methods of cognition, as well as methods of literal interpretation of legal norms, a predictive method and a method of legal modeling.

The author comes to the conclusion that there are signs of creativity in human activities when working with artificial intelligence systems, which makes it possible to recognize users of such systems as the authors of the objects they generate in accordance with the presumption of authorship enshrined in legislation.

Keywordsintellectual property, artificial intelligence, author of the result of intellectual activity, results of intellectual activity, copyright
AcknowledgmentThe work was carried out with the financial support of the PRUE
Received14.09.2023
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register. 
1. Bayamlioglu E. Intelligent Agents and Their Legal Status^ An Essay on Artificial Intelligence and Personality // Ankara Bar Review. – 2008. - № 1. – P. 46-54.
2. Krausova A. Intersections Between Law and Artificial Intelligence // International Journal of Computer. – Vol. 27. - № 1. – P. 55-68.
3. Solaiman S.M. Legal Personality of Robots, Corporations, Idols and Chimpanzees: a Quest for Legitimacy // Artificial Intelligence and Law. – 2017. – Vol. 25. - № 2. – P. 155-179.
4. Weitzenboeck E.M. Electronic Agents and the Formation of Contracts // International Journal of Law and Information Technology. – 2001. – Vol. 9. - № 3. – P. 204-234.
5. Vitko V.S. Analiz nauchnykh predstavlenij ob avtore i pravakh na rezul'taty deyatel'nosti iskusstvennogo intellekta // IS. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. - 2019. - № 2. - S. 5 —20.
6. Gurko A. Iskusstvennyj intellekta i avtorskoe pravo: vzglyad v buduschee // Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. – 2017. - № 12. – S. 7-18.
7. Dremlyuga R.I. i Dremlyuga O.A. Iskusstvennyj intellekt - sub'ekt prava: argumenty za i protiv // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. - 2019. - № 2. - S. 120-125.
8. Zujkov S. O problemakh patentnoj okhrany izobretenij, sozdannykh iskusstvennym intellektom // Tsit. po. URL: >>>> (data obrascheniya 13.09.2023).
9. Ivliev G.P., Egorova M.A. Yuridicheskaya problematika pravovogo statusa iskusstvennogo intellekta i produktov, sozdannykh sistemami iskusstvennogo intellekta // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. - 2022. - № 6. - S. 32 – 46.
10. Kalyatin V.O. Opredelenie sub'ekta prav na rezul'taty intellektual'noj deyatel'nosti, sozdannye s ispol'zovaniem iskusstvennogo intellekta // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. – 2022. – Vol. 15. - № 4. – S. 24-50.
11. Morkhat P.M. Pravosub'ektnost' yunitov iskusstvennogo intellekta. Grazhdansko-pravovoe issledovanie: monografiya / P.M. Morkhat. – M. : YuNITI-DANA, 2018. – 113 s.
12. Nazarov N. Priznanie avtorstva na rezul'taty intellektual'noj deyatel'nosti, sozdannye iskusstvennym intellektom // Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. – 2020. - № 3. – S. 53-62.
13. Orlova T.E. Avtorskoe pravo na rezul'taty deyatel'nosti iskusstvennogo intellekta // Voprosy rossijskoj yustitsii. – 2022. - № 21. – S. 204-221.
14. Rozhkova M.A. Stanet li iskusstvennyj intellekt samostoyatel'nym sub'ektom prava? // Khozyajstvo i pravo. - 2021. - № 6 (533). - S. 14-22.
15. Sinel'nikova V.N., Revinskij O.V. Prava na rezul'taty iskusstvennogo intellekta // Kopirajt. – 2017. - № 4. – S. 17-27.
16. Kharitonova Yu.S., Savina V.S. Tekhnologiya iskusstvennogo intellekta i pravo: vyzovy sovremennosti // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. - 2020. - № 3. - S. 524 – 549.
17. Yastrebov O.A. Pravosub'ektnost' ehlektronnogo litsa: teoretiko-metodologicheskie podkhody // Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossijskoj akademii nauk. – 2018. – T. 13. № 2. – S. 36-55.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up