Simile Est Regnum Coelorum Patrifamilias: Conceptualization of Familia and Patria Potestas in the Encyclopedic Works of Isidore of Seville

The social institutions of familia and patria potestas, as well as the social roles of pater familias and mater familias associated with them, are generally believed to be the key concepts for understanding the social organization of Roman society. Their importance was so great that they continued to be mentioned in early medieval sources even after the collapse of the Western Roman Empire. Meanwhile, familia and patria potestas are far from being as unambiguous and straightforward as they seemed for a long time to researchers who studied them almost exclusively on the basis of Roman law. It is enough to mention that the grounds for acquiring the status of mater familias were already debated by Roman writers and lawyers. The importance of the concepts under consideration is also due to their connection with the formation of the institution of the European family, which they had heavily influenced. The purpose of the current paper is to reconstruct and analyze Isidore of Seville’s conceptions of familia and patria potestas since he was one of the most influential early medieval writers, who laid the foundation for the genre of the medieval encyclopedia. The article attempts to establish to what extent Seville bishop’s views on these concepts coincide with the ideas about them that were characteristic for Antiquity. As sources we use two works of Isidore of Seville, which modern researchers, basing on the method, structure and thematic continuity, classify as belonging to grammar-encyclopedic genres — “De differentiis” and “Etymologiae”. In addition to the above mentioned, our choice is determined by the time of their creation: “De differentiis” is the earliest, and “Etymologiae” the latest work of the bishop of Seville. This will allow us to trace not only the evolution of the concepts of familia, patria potestas, pater familias and mater familias in comparison with the antique views on them, but also to see a possible changes in his own opinion about them. In addition, the main methods that Isidore used writing these works were explaining the essence of the concept by comparing it with words of similar meaning, and searching for its etymology, which coincides with our research goal. Our analysis shows that Isidore of Seville considered familia the basis of any community, a concept well known to his contemporaries and not requiring special explanations. In both works, familia is mentioned primarily in the discourse of kinship, which was uncharacteristic of Antiquity. This word in Seville bishop’s writings indicates both a group comparable to gens (which is also found in Roman sources), and a small kin group, with parents and children predominantly mentioned among the members. The latter semantics was not indicated by researchers for the period of Antiquity. Isidore of Seville did not associate the acquisition of the status of pater familias with freedom from the patria potestas of another person, as was thought in Rome. He anchored it in fatherhood and adherence to a certain moral and ethical code of conduct. In “De differentiis” the bishop Seville grounded the status of mater familias in motherhood. However, later, in “Etymologiae” he emphasizes the legal aspect of its acquiring, which generally reflects ancient discussions on this issue. The Bishop of Seville also mentions the power of a husband over his wife, its external symbols and the reasons for its establishment, but does not specify what exactly this power consisted of. As for patria potestas, without mentioning the full name of this institution, he speaks of the power of fathers over children and equates the later to slaves in status. At the same time, it seems likely that Isidore see it as power limited by society and the internal self-control of the father, based on patria dilectione, and not arbitrariness in relation to subjects. These ideas are consistent with those that, according to researchers, existed in Roman society, although Isidore’s probably had other grounds.

Keywords

power, relatives, familia, pater familias, patria potestas, mater familias, Antiquity, early Middle Ages, Isidore of Seville, “De differentiis”, “Etymologiae”

Acknowledgment

This research has been conducted with the financial support of the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 20-18-00374-P.

Received

31.05.2024

Publication date

15.07.2024

Number of characters

111632

Cite

GOST	Vershinina Y. Simile Est Regnum Coelorum Patrifamilias: Conceptualization of Familia and Patria Potestas in the Encyclopedic Works of Isidore of Seville // ISTORIYA – 2024. – V. 15. – Issue 5 (139) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://history.jes.su/S207987840031266-1-1 (circulation date: 22.07.2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840031266-1
MLA	Vershinina, Yulia "Simile Est Regnum Coelorum Patrifamilias: Conceptualization of Familia and Patria Potestas in the Encyclopedic Works of Isidore of Seville." ISTORIYA 15.5 (139) (2024) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840031266-1
APA	Vershinina Y. (2024). Simile Est Regnum Coelorum Patrifamilias: Conceptualization of Familia and Patria Potestas in the Encyclopedic Works of Isidore of Seville. ISTORIYA 15(5 (139)) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840031266-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 3

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avl Gelij. Atticheskie nochi. Knigi XI—XX / per. s lat. pod obsch. red. A. Ya. Tyzhova, A. P. Bekhter. SPb.: ITs «Gumanitarnaya Akademiya», 2008.

2. Birkin M. Yu. Antichnoe nasledie v pervoj knige «Differentsiĭ» Isidora Sevil'skogo // Vestnik RGGU. Seriya «Istoriya. Filologiya. Kul'turologiya. Vostokovedenie». 2018. № 10 (43). Ch. 2. S. 207—216.

3. Vorontsov S. A. Isidor Sevil'skiĭ v istoriko-filosofskom kontekste: dis. ... kand. ist. nauk. M., 2015.

4. Dvoretskiĭ I. Kh. Latinsko-russkiĭ slovar'. M.: Russkiĭ yazyk-Media, 2003.

5. Digesty Yustiniana / per. s lat.; otv. red. L. L. Kofanov. M.: Statut, 2005. T. VII, polutom 2 (knigi XLVIII—L).

6. Isidor Sevil'skij. Glava 2. Ob obschestvennykh zdaniyakh // Kniga XV. O postrojkakh i polyakh // Ehtimologii / per. s lat. i kom. A. V. Garadzhi // Trudy Russkoj antropologicheskoj shkoly. 2007. № 4.2. S. 290—332.

7. Isidor Sevil'skij. Kniga IX. O yazykakh, narodakh, pravleniyakh, vojske, grazhdanakh, rodstve. Glava 5. O kategoriyakh i stepenyakh rodstva // Isidor Sevil'skij. Ehtimologii / per. s lat. i kom. A. A. Pavlova // ANTIQUITAS AETERNA. Povolzhskij antikovedcheskij zhurnal. 2014. № 4. S. 535—548.

8. Isidor Sevil'skij. Kniga IX. O yazykakh, narodakh, pravleniyakh, vojske, grazhdanakh, rodstve. Glava 2. O poimenovanii narodov // Isidor Sevil'skij. Ehtimologii / per. s lat. i kom. A. A. Pavlova // Vestnik Syktyvkarskogo universiteta. Seriya gumanitarnykh nauk. 2021. № 2 (18). S. 77—89.

9. Kuznetsov A. The Computer Analysis of Latin Texts: Topic Modeling of “Historia de Regibus Gothorum, Vandalorum et Suevorum” by Isidore of Seville // ISTORIYA. 2020. Vol. 11. Issue 3 (89). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840009681-8-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840009681-8

10. Marej E. S. Grammatika i bogoslovie v «Differentsiyakh» Isidora Sevil'skogo // Vestnik RGGU. 2013. № 13 (114). S. 66—77.

11. Marej E. S. Ehntsiklopedist, bogoslov, yurist: Isidor Sevil'skij i ego predstavleniya o prave i pravosudii. M.: Russkij fond sodejstviya obrazovaniyu i nauke, 2014.

12. Pavlov A. A. Isidor Sevil'skij i ego «Ehtimologii» // ANTIQVITAS AETERNA. Povolzhskij antikovedcheskij zhurnal. Vyp. 4: Istoriya ponyatiĭ, kategorial'nyj apparat sovremennoj istoricheskoj nauki i problemy (re)konstruktsii proshlogo / pod red. A. V. Makhlayuka i O. L. Gabelko. Nizhnij Novgorod: Nizhegorodskij gosudarstvennyj universitet im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2014. S. 527—524.

13. Rimskaya familia v otrazhenii «Atticheskikh nochej» Avla Gelliya // Gendernye predstavleniya rimlyan v otrazhenii rimskoj antikvarnoj traditsii: khrestomatiya / sost., per. s lat., vstup. stat'i i komm. A. A. Pavlova. Syktyvkar: Izd-vo SGU im. Pitirima Sorokina, 2015.

14. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik / pod red. I. B. Novitskogo, I. S. Pereterskogo. M.: KNORUS, 2014.

15. Ukolova V. I. Antichnoe nasledie i kul'tura rannego srednevekov'ya (konets V — nachalo VII veka). M.: Nauka, 1989.

16. Ukolova V. I. «Razlichiya» Isidora Sevil'skogo: slovo kak instrument poznaniya // Srednie veka. 2016. № 77 (3-4). S. 368—376.

17. Franchozi Dzh. Institutsionnyj kurs rimskogo prava. M.: Statut, 2004.

18. Fokin A. R. Isidor Sevil'skij // Pravoslavnaya ehntsiklopediya. M.: Tserkovno-nauchnyj tsentr «Pravoslavnaya ehntsiklopediya», 2011. T. XXVII: Isaak Sirin — Istoricheskie knigi. S. 224—238.

19. Kharitonov L. A. «Isidor Sevil'skij». Istoriko-filosofskaya drama // Isidor Sevil'skij. Ehtimologii ili nachala v XX knigakh. Kn. I—III: Sem' svobodnykh iskusstv / per. s latin., stat'ya, primech. i uĸazateli L. A. Kharitonova. SPb.: Evraziya, 2006. S. 160—225.

20. Arjava A. Paternal Power in Late Antiquity // The Journal of Roman Studies. 1998. Vol. 88. P. 147—165.

21. A. Gellii. Noctes Atticae // Sub cura P.K. Marshall. Oxonii: e typographeo Clarendoniano, 1968. T. II. Libri XI—XX.

22. Boetii. In Ciceronis Topica // Patrologiae cursus completus. Series Latina. Paris, 1847. T. 64. Col. 1039—1074.

23. Bravo Bosch M. J. Levitas Animi // GLOSSAE. European Journal of Legal History. 2017. T. 14. P. 1009—1024.

24. Crook J. Patria Potestas // The Classical Quarterly, New Series. 1967. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 113—122.

25. De Vaan M. Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages // Leiden Indo—European Etymological Dictionary Series / ed. by A. Lubotsky. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2008. Vol. 7.

26. Díaz y Díaz M. C. Introducción general // Isidoro de Sevilla. Etimologías / Prep. por J. Oroz Reta, M.-A. Marcos Casquiero. Madrid: Biblioteca de Auctores Cristianos, 1982. P. 6—257.

27. Erdödy J. SC Claudianum and Levitas Animi — a Gender Issue? // Pázmány Law Review. 2023. No. 8 (1). P. 11—30.

28. Fayer C. La familia romana. Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 1994.

29. Fiori R. Mateifamilias // Bullettino dell’Istituto di Diritto romano Vittorio Scialoja. 1993—1994. Vol. XCVI—XCVII. Milano: Dott. A. Giuffrè editorep. P. 455—498.

30. Harris W. V. The Roman Father’s Power of Life and Death // Studies in Roman Law in Memory of A. Schiller / ed. by R. S. Bagnall, W. V. Harris. Leiden: Brill, 1986. P. 81—95.

31. Isidori Hispalensis Episcopi Etymologiarum sive Originum libri XX / ed. by W. M. Lindsay. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1911. Vol. 1, 2.

32. Isidoro de Sevilla. Diferencias / Introducción, edición crítica, traducción y notas por C. Codoñer Merino. P.: Les Belles Lettres, 1992.

33. Karras R. M. The History of Marriage and the Myth of Friedelehe // Early Medieval Europe. 2006. No. 14 (2). P. 119—151.

34. Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.

35. The Etymologies of Isidore of Seville / transl. from latin by S. A. Barney, W. J. Lewis, J. A. Beach, O. Berghof. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

36. S. Isidori Hispalensis episcopi Differentiarum sive De proprietate sermonum libri duo // Patrologiae cursus completus / ed. J. P. Migne. P., 1850. T. 83.5. Col. 9—96.

37. Lacey W. K. Patria Potestas // The Family in Ancient Rome: New perspectives / ed. by B. Rawson. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986. P. 121—144.

38. Perelló C. A. Problems Concerning familia in Early Rome // Roman Legal Tradition. 2008. No. 4. P. 37—45.

39. Saller R. P. “Familia, Domus”, and the Roman Conception of the Family // Phoenix. 1984. Vol. 38, No. 4. P. 336—355.

40. Saller R. P. Paterfamilias, Materfamilias, and the Gendered Semantics of the Roman Household // Classical Philology. 1999. Vol. 94. No. 2. P. 182—197.

41. Saller R. P. Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

42. Serviani in Vergili Aeneidos libros IX—XII commentarii // ed. by C.E. Murgia. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2018.

43. Shaw B. D. Raising and Killing Children: Two Roman Myths // Mnemosyne, Fourth Series. 2001. Vol. 54. Fasc. 1. P. 31—77.

44. Thomas Y. Vitae Necisque Potestas: The Father, the State, Death // Legal Artifices: Ten Essays on Roman Law in the Present Tense. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2021. P. 144—209.

45. Treggiari S. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.