Loyalty in 15th and 17th Century Legal Discourse and Its Medieval Sources

 
PIIS207987840031211-1-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840031211-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Saint Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

English common law jurists in the Middle Ages and early modern times viewed loyalty exclusively as a phenomenon based on a deeply personalized connection between a vassal and his primary lord-king. It was in this form that the idea of loyalty reflected the traditional feudal principle demonstrating the connection of loyalty and its main attribute, fidelity, with the so-called cause of the king. Despite its ubiquity and related practices, this understanding of loyalty to some extent competed with the gaining popularity view of the applicability of the principle of loyalty and related behavioral stereotypes to such concepts as kingship and the community of the kingdom, including their territorial dimension. The article deals separately with the phenomenon of so-called dual loyalty, the origins of which are linked to the so-called right of fiefs and the practice of subfeudation. This form of loyalty and related subjection allowed for the simultaneous association of a person with two monarchs, as well as the practice of land ownership in two contiguous kingdoms. The author examines how such a form of loyalty was positioned in the right-wing literature of the 15th — 17th centuries, emphasizes the legitimate nature of this phenomenon, and considers the cases that led to its termination.

KeywordsMedieval and Early modern England, common law, legal discourse, loyalty, dual loyalty
AcknowledgmentThe article is financially supported by the grant of RSF 23-28-00267 “The Rise of the Social: Social terminology and Classifications in the Early Modern Intellectual Discourse”.
Received08.04.2024
Publication date15.07.2024
Number of characters31785
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 4

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Fyodorov S. Nobilitas in the 16th — 17th Centuries Antiquarian Discourse and Emergence of the Social // ISTORIYA. 2022. Vol. 13. Issue 6 (116). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840021843-6-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840021843-6

2. Fedorov S. E. Diskussiya ob istinnom blagorodstve i sotsial'nye klassifikatsii znati v antikvarnykh tekstakh rannego Novogo vremeni // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2023. T. 68. Vyp. 3. S. 712—727.

3. Fyodorov S. Knighthood and Titled Nobility in the Antiquarian Episteme of the 16th — 17th Centuries // ISTORIYA. 2023. Vol. 14. Issue 7 (129). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840027294-2-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840027294-2

4. Denton J. Robert Winchelsey and the Crown, 1294—1313. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.

5. Dickinson J. Court Politics and the Earl of Essex, 1589—1601. L.: Routledge, 2012.

6. Genealogies of Legal Vision / ed. P. Goodrich, V. Hayaert. L.: Routledge, 2015.

7. Insley C. L. G. Kings and lords in tenth-century Cornwall // The Journal of the Historical Association. 2013. Vol. 98. P. 2—22.

8. Lavelle R. Royal control and the disposition of estates in tenth-century England: reflections on the charters of King Eadwig // The Haskins Society Journal. 2011. Vol. 23. P. 23—50.

9. Loyalty in the Middle Ages: Ideal and Practice of a Cross-Social Value / J. Sonntag et al. Leiden: Brepols, 2015.

10. Loyalty to the Monarchy in late Medieval and Early Modern England, c. 1400—1688 / ed. M. Ward, M. Hefferan. Cham: Palgrave, 2020.

11. Molyneaux G. The Formation of the English Kingdom in the Tenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

12. Price P. J. Natural Law and Birthright Citizenship in Calvin’s Case (1608) // Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. 1997. Vol. 9. P. 73—145.

13. Salmond J. W. Citizenship and Allegiance // Law Quarterly Review. 1901. Vol. 17. P. 270—282.

14. Seipp D. Fitzherbert, The New Natura Brevium // Fitzherbert, The New Natura Brevium // The Formation and Transmission of Western Legal Culture / Dauchy S., G. Martyn, A. Musson, H. Pihlajamäki, A. Wijffels. Cham: Springer, 2016. P. 82—83.

15. Stone J. John Cowell’s Interpreter: Legal Tradition and Lexicographical Innovation // Sederi.1999. Vol. 10. P. 121—129.

16. The Formation and Transmission of Western Legal Culture / Dauchy S., Martyn G., Musson A., Pihlajamäki H., Wijffels A. Cham: Springer, 2016.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up