The Concept of a “Fair” Contract in the Law of the Ancient World

 
PIIS207987840030902-1-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840030902-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The article shows the implementation of the principle of equity in a civil contract in the sources of law of the Ancient East, in particular, in the sources of law of Ancient Babylon and Ancient India, as well as antiquity. Using the example of the Code of Hammurabi, the Laws of Manu (Dharmaśāstra Manu), the Arthashastra by Kautilya, the Institutes of Gaius and the Digest of Justinian, the author of the article considered an attempt to assert the category of “fair contract” through the prism of “proportionality” and “equal scale”, establishing a certain “balance of freedom” and a balance of interests of the parties, as well as protecting the “weak” side in civil-legal agreement. The methods of suppression by ancient legislators and jurists of abuses by any party in contract, both at its conclusion and in its content, as well as during execution of contract, are analyzed. The limitation of amount of usurious interest and the fight against abuse of creditors in regulation of loan agreement; the suppression of various abuses by sellers and buyers in purchase and sale agreement; employers and those employed in personal employment contracts; custodians in the custody agreement in the sources of law of Ancient Mesopotamia, Ancient India and Ancient Rome are considered. The article analyzes the implementation of the “аequitas” concept in Roman law of the classical and postclassical periods. Special attention is paid in the article to the consideration of the influence of religion, ideology, legal culture, and value attitudes of a particular ancient society on solving the problem of establishing a “fair” civil law contract.

KeywordsAncient world, Ancient East, antiquity, law, civil law, contract, spiritual culture, legal culture, religion, Ancient Mesopotamia, Ancient India, Ancient Rome, Roman law, Code of Hammurabi, Laws of Manu, Dharmaśāstra, Arthashastra by Kautilya, Institutes of Gaius, Digest of Justinian
Received27.11.2023
Publication date15.06.2024
Number of characters36403
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 17

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Artkhashastra, ili «Nauka politiki» / per. s sanskrita V. I. Kal'yanov. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka». 1993.

2. Bartoshek M. Rimskoe pravo: ponyatiya, terminy, opredeleniya / per. s cheshsk. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1989.

3. Variash I. The Concept of Justice in The Social Strategies of Medieval Authority // ISTORIYA. 2020. Vol. 11. Issue 10 (96). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840011185-2-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840011185-2

4. Gaj. Institutsii. Knigi 1—4 / per. F. Dydynskij, red. L. L. Kofanov, V. A. Savel'ev. M.: YuRIST', 1997.

5. Grimm D. D. Lektsii po dogme rimskogo prava / red. V. A. Tomsinov. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Zertsalo», 2003.

6. Digesty Yustiniana / per. s latinskogo, otv. red. L. L. Kofanov. T. I—VIII. M.: Statut, 2002—2006.

7. Emel'yanov V. V. Drevnij Shumer. Ocherki kul'tury. SPb.: Peterburgskoe vostokovedenie, 2001.

8. Zakony Manu // Khrestomatiya po istorii gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnykh stran. V 2 t. / otv. red. N. A. Krasheninnikova, sost. O. L. Lysenko, E. N. Trikoz. T. 1. Drevnij mir i Srednie veka. M.: NORMA, 2003.

9. Zakony Khammurapi // Khrestomatiya po istorii gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnykh stran. V 2 t. / otv. red. N. A. Krasheninnikova, sost. O. L. Lysenko, E. N. Trikoz. T. 1. Drevnij mir i Srednie veka. M.: NORMA, 2003.

10. Istoriya Vostoka. T. 1. Vostok v drevnosti / otv. red. V. A. Yakobson. M.: Izdatel'skaya firma «Vostochnaya literatura» RAN, M. 1999.

11. Istoriya gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnykh stran: izbrannye pamyatniki prava. Drevnost' i Srednevekov'e. Uchebnoe posobie / nauch. red. N. A. Krasheninnikova. M.: Norma; INFRA-M, 2015.

12. Krasheninnikova N. A. Zakony Khammurapi — drevnejshij pamyatnik prava: tsivilizatsionnyj metod issledovaniya // Metodologiya sravnitel'no-pravovykh issledovanij. Zhidkovskie chteniya. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferentsii. Moskva, 30 marta 2012 g. / red. G. I. Muromtsev, M. V. Nemytina. M.: RUDN, 2013.

13. Krasheninnikova N. A. Pravovaya kul'tura sovremennoj Indii: innovatsionnye i traditsionnye cherty. M.: Norma; Infra-M, 2009.

14. Momotov V. V. Printsipy spravedlivosti i tselesoobraznosti v institutakh anglo-amerikanskikh i kontinental'no-evropejskikh pravoporyadkov // Rossijskoe pravosudie. 2018. № 1 (141).

15. Pokrovskij I. A. Istoriya rimskogo prava. M.: Statut, 2004.

16. Poldnikov D. Yu. Foma Akvinskij kak teoretik dogovornogo prava // Istoriya gosudarstva i prava. 2011. № 11.

17. Poldnikov D. Yu. Formirovanie ucheniya o dogovore v pravovoj nauke Zapadnoj Evropy (XII—XVI vv.). Monografiya. M.: Prospekt, 2016.

18. Savel'ev V. A. Spravedlivost' (aequitas) i dobrosovestnost' (bona fides) v rimskom prave klassicheskogo perioda // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2014. № 3.

19. Togoeva O. The Norms of Roman Law and the Concept of Jurisdiction in the French Coutumiers of the 13th Century // ISTORIYA. 2021. Vol. 12. Issue 9 (107). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840017153-7-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840017153-7

20. Frankfort G., Frankfort G. A., Uilson Dzh., Yakobsen T. V preddverii filosofii. Dukhovnye iskaniya drevnego cheloveka / per. s angl. T. Tolstaya. SPb.: Amfora, 2001.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up