The Problem of Legal Acculturation of the Kazakh Peoples Court of the Early 20th Century in the Assessment of the Orenburg Lawyer and Public Figure L. A. Slovohotov

Lyubichankovskiy, Sergey; Aleshina, Svetlana

doi:10.18254/S207987840029945-8

Home

ISTORIYA

Issue 1 (135)

The Problem of Legal Acculturation of the Kazakh People's Court of the Early 20th Century in the Assessment of the Orenburg Lawyer and Public Figure L. A. Slovohotov

Annotation
Reviews
References

The Problem of Legal Acculturation of the Kazakh People's Court of the Early 20th Century in the Assessment of the Orenburg Lawyer and Public Figure L. A. Slovohotov

PII

S207987840029945-8-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840029945-8

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Sergey Lyubichankovskiy

Affiliation:
Orenburg State Pedagogical University
Tyumen State University
Address: Russian Federation, Orenburg

Svetlana Aleshina

Affiliation: Orenburg State Pedagogical University
Address: Russian Federation, Orenburg

Journal name

ISTORIYA

Edition

Abstract

The article analyzes the contribution of a prominent public and judicial figure of Orenburg Leonid Alexandrovich Slovohotov to the social and scientific discussion about the possibilities of using traditional institutions of justice in the all-imperial system of government and court, which unfolded in the late 19th — early 20th century. The views of L. A. Slovohotov concerning the people's court of the Kazakh people are analyzed. The absentee dispute between L. A. Slovohotov, on the one hand, and N. Dingilstedt, N. Maximov, I. I. Kraft and A. I. Dobrosmyslov, on the other hand, is shown. It is concluded that, according to L. A. Slovohotov, not the eradication of traditional forms of justice and legal consciousness was the main way of further integration of the Kazakh society into the all-Russian socio-cultural field, but the need for legal acculturation of the Kazakh people's court of the early 20th century through its inclusion in the all-imperial system of justice.

Keywords

acculturation, imperial acculturation policy, justice, integration of the periphery, people's court, Kazakhs

Acknowledgment

The study was carried out at the expense of the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 23-18-00268, the project “Justice in the system of security and integration processes of the peripheral regions of the Russian Empire (18th — early 20th century)”, realized on the basis of Tyumen State University.

Received

04.07.2023

Publication date

31.01.2024

Number of characters

25785

Cite

GOST	Lyubichankovskiy S., Aleshina S. The Problem of Legal Acculturation of the Kazakh People's Court of the Early 20th Century in the Assessment of the Orenburg Lawyer and Public Figure L. A. Slovohotov // ISTORIYA – 2024. – V. 15. – Issue 1 (135) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://history.jes.su/S207987840029945-8-1 (circulation date: 30.06.2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840029945-8
MLA	Lyubichankovskiy, Sergey, Aleshina, Svetlana "The Problem of Legal Acculturation of the Kazakh People's Court of the Early 20th Century in the Assessment of the Orenburg Lawyer and Public Figure L. A. Slovohotov." ISTORIYA 15.1 (135) (2024) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840029945-8
APA	Lyubichankovskiy S., Aleshina S. (2024). The Problem of Legal Acculturation of the Kazakh People's Court of the Early 20th Century in the Assessment of the Orenburg Lawyer and Public Figure L. A. Slovohotov. ISTORIYA 15(1 (135)) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840029945-8

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 60

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Vasil'ev D. V. Administrativnaya akkul'turatsiya: opyt regional'noj politiki Rossijskoj imperii v Tsentral'noj Azii. XVIII—XIX vv.: monografiya. Orenburg: Izdatel'skij tsentr OGAU, 2018.

2. Vasil'ev D. V. Bremya imperii. Administrativnaya politika Rossii v Tsentral'noj Azii. Vtoraya polovina XIX v. M.: Izd-vo «Politicheskaya ehntsiklopediya», 2018.

3. Vasil'ev D. V. Rossiya i Kazakhskaya step': administrativnaya politika i status okrainy. XVIII — pervaya polovina XIX vv. M.: ROSPEhN, 2014.

4. Voropanov V. A. Sud i pravosudie v provintsii Rossijskogo gosudarstva v XVI — pervoj polovine XVIII vv. (na primere oblastej Povolzh'ya, Urala i Zapadnoj Sibiri): monografiya. M.: Prospekt, 2017.

5. Voropanov V. A. Formirovanie institutov sudebnoj sistemy Rossijskoj imperii v Kazakhstane v usloviyakh frontirnoj modernizatsii v kontse XVIII v. // Cahiers du Monde Russe. 2020. T. 60. № 4. S. 657—681.

6. Dingil'shtedt N. Odno iz otzhivayuschikh uchrezhdenij // Zhurnal grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo prava. 1892. № 1. S. 43—97.

7. Dobrosmyslov A. I. Sud u kirgiz Turgajskoj oblasti v XVIII i XIX vv. Kazan', 1904.

8. Imperskaya politika akkul'turatsii i problema kolonializma (na primere kochevykh i polukochevykh narodov Rossijskoj imperii): monografiya / nauch. red. prof. S. V. Lyubichankovskij. Orenburg: Izdatel'skij tsentr OGAU, 2019.

9. Kotyukova T. V. Turkestan v diskurse frontirnoj modernizatsii Rossijskoj imperii v kontse XIX — nachale XX vv. // Islam v sovremennom mire: vnutrigosudarstvennyj i mezhdunarodno-politicheskij aspekty. 2015. T. 11. № 1. S. 43—54.

10. Kotyukova T. V. Turkestanskoe napravlenie dumskoj politiki Rossii (1905—1917 gg.). M.: Ehnter-Grafiko, 2008.

11. Kraft I. I. Sudebnaya chast' v Turkestanskom krae. Orenburg, 1898.

12. Lyubichankovskiy S. Accultural Model of an Empire as a Methodological Alternative to the Colonial Approach // ISTORIYA. 2019. Vol. 10. Issue 8 (82). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840006065-0-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840006065-0

13. Lyubichankovskiy S. Imperial Policy of Acculturation of “Foreigners” by Means of Enlightenment (Based on Materials from the Ural-Volga and Central Asian Territories of the Russian Empire) // ISTORIYA. 2021. Vol. 12. Issue 3 (101). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840014091-9-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840014091-9

14. Maksimov N. Narodnyj sud u kirgiz // Zhurnal yuridicheskogo obschestva. 1897. Kn. 7. S.123—147.

15. Malyshev N. Obychnoe semejnoe pravo u kirgiz. Yaroslavl', 1902.

16. Poberezhnikov I. V. Kanadskij i rossijskij frontir: obschee i osobennoe // Ural'skij istoricheskij vestnik. 2009. № 2. S. 25—30.

17. Pochekaev R. Pretended Suzerainty: Moscow Tsars and Kazakh Khans (According to Russian-Language Diplomatic Documents of the End of 16th — Beginning of 18th Centuries) // ISTORIYA. 2019. Vol. 10. Issue 1 (75). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840002567-2-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S0002567-2-1

18. Pochekaev R. Yu. Gubernatory i khany. Lichnostnyj faktor pravovoj politiki Rossijskoj imperii v Tsentral'noj Azii: XVIII — nachalo XX vv. M.: NIU VShEh, 2017.

19. Remnev A. V., Suvorova N. G. «Russkoe delo» na aziatskikh okrainakh: «russkost'» pod ugrozoj ili «somnitel'nye» kul'turtregery // Ab Imperio. 2008. № 2. S. 157—222.

20. Remnev A. V., Suvorova N. G. Kolonizatsiya Aziatskoj Rossii: imperskie i natsional'nye stsenarii vtoroj poloviny XIX — nachala XX vv.: monografiya. Omsk: Izdatel'skij dom «Nauka», 2013.

21. Slezkin Yu. Arkticheskie zerkala: Rossiya i malye narody Severa. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2008.

22. Slovokhotov L. A. Narodnyj sud obychnogo prava kirgiz Maloj ordy // Trudy Orenburgskoj uchenoj arkhivnoj komissii. Vyp. XV. Orenburg, 1905.

23. Trepavlov V. V. «Belyj tsar'». Obraz monarkha i predstavleniya o poddanstve u narodov Rossii XV—XVIII vv. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Olega Abyshko, 2017.

24. Kharuzin A. N. K voprosu o proiskhozhdenii kirgizskogo naroda // Ehtnograficheskoe obozrenie. 1895. № 3. S. 49—92.

25. Shablej P. S. Poddanstvo v Aziatskoj Rossii: istoricheskij smysl i politiko-pravovaya kontseptualizatsiya // Vestnik Evrazii. 2008. № 3. S. 99—122.

26. Lyubichankovskiy S. V. Imperial Acculturation on Russia’s Southeastern Frontier: An International Survey // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Istoriya Rossii. 2020. T. 19. № 3. S. 727—740.