Between the Soviet Past and National History: to the Issue of a New Kazakh Identity

 
PIIS207987840029775-1-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840029775-1
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Astrakhan State University
Address: Russian Federation, Astrakhan; Moscow
Affiliation:
Astrakhan State University
Institute of Philosophy RAS
State academic University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Astrakhan; Moscow
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The article deals with the impact of the politics of memory on the process of national identity formation, which is topical for the domestic political science. It is shown that the politics of memory always deals with different types of collective memory (age, gender, national, religious and other differences), which are built in the form of projection of the past into indefinite and open future, or in the form of questioning of the past from the present. These differences appear as a mediating link in the process of identity constitution. The various ideas, values, symbols and meanings of a cultural or religious kind existing in society allow groups to challenge the identity of the entire community and at the same time maintain the existence of a common identity of the community as a whole. However, it is important, that these relative variations do not become frozen in their existence and do not develop into absolute ruptures and divisions. It is these principles underlie formation of the politics of memory. The process of influence of the politics of memory on the formation of national identity is considered in the article on the example of Kazakhstan identity formation in the post-Soviet period. The authors analyze various state programs the politics of memory; analyze statistical data obtained in the course of sociological research on the peculiarities of the formation of collective memory in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The study concludes that Soviet values in Kazakhstan still play a role for the outgoing generation, born and raised in the USSR, while the younger generation replaces them with modern Western values, which also does not contribute to the preservation of national specificity and recognition of the state as an independent, separate sovereign entity. And if traditions used to fit into the dominant all-Soviet context, nowadays they should fit into the postmodern project.

Keywordsnational identity, policy of memory, collective memory, Kazakhstani identity, Republic of Kazakhstan
Received30.06.2023
Publication date31.12.2023
Number of characters34408
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 50

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alimova S. B. «Narod v potoke istorii»: o roli istoricheskogo naslediya v formirovanii kazakhstanskoj identichnosti // Akademik E. A. Bөketovtің ғylymi zhәne shyғarmashylyқ mұrasy: E. A. Bөketovtің 90 zhyldyғyna arnalғan Khalyқaral.ғyl. — tәzhіr.konf.materialdary (27—28 nauryz). Nauchnoe i tvorcheskoe nasledie akademika E. A. Buketova. Қaraғandy. 2015. T. 2. S. 349—352.

2. Valikhanov Ch. Ch. O kirgiz-kajsatskoj bol'shoj orde // Sobranie sochinenij v 5 t. Alma-Ata, 1985. T.1. S. 180—183.

3. Galiev A. A. Otrazhenie sovetskoj istorii v politike pamyati sovremennogo Kazakhstana // Mir Bol'shogo Altaya. 2016. 2 (3.1).

4. Zabirova A. T. Formirovanie, legitimatsiya i vosproizvodstvo identichnosti v postsovetskom Kazakhstane // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2003. № 12. S. 118—126.

5. Identichnost': Lichnost', obschestvo, politika. Ehntsiklopedicheskoe izdanie / otv. red. I. S. Semenenko. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Ves' Mir», 2017.

6. Individual'naya i kollektivnaya pamyat' v tsifrovuyu ehpokhu: kollektivnaya monografiya / red. E. O. Trufanova, N. N. Emel'yanova, A. F. Yakovleva. M.: Akvilon, 2022.

7. Kirgiz-Kajsaki bol'shoj, srednej i maloj ordy // Sibirskij vestnik. Ch. 9, 10. SPb., 1820.

8. Kovba D. M., Gribovod E. G. Osobennosti formirovaniya i realizatsii politiki pamyati o Velikoj Otechestvennoj vojne na postsovetskom prostranstve // Nauchnyj zhurnal «Diskurs-Pi». 2020. № 2 (39). S. 59—77.

9. Medeuova K. Zatyanuvshayasya «sovetskost'» i transformatsii kollektivnoj pamyati: sovetskie i postsovetskie memorial'nye kompleksy v Kazakhstane. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/161_nlo_1_2020/article/21982

10. Medeuova K. O chem khotyat pomnit' v gorodakh (analiz sovremennoj kommemorativnoj politiki v Kazakhstane) // Zhenschiny-uchenye Belarusi i Kazakhstana: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii. Minsk: RIVSh, 2018. S. 307—309.

11. Ryzhichkin N. N. Postsovetskij Kazakhstan. Puti formirovaniya natsional'noj identichnosti // Svobodnaya mysl'. 2020. № 3. S. 175—186.

12. Semenenko I. C., Lapkin V. V., Bardin A. L., V. I. Pantin Mezhdu gosudarstvom i natsiej: dilemmy politiki identichnosti na postsovetskom prostranstve // Polis. 2017. № 5. S. 64.

13. Sultangazy G. Zh, Mukataeva L. K. Istoricheskaya pamyat' v usloviyakh sovremennogo Kazakhstana: poiski geroev i smyslov // Ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal “Edu.e-history.kz”. № 2 (22). 2020.

14. Tuleshov V. K voprosu o formirovanii i razvitii identichnosti v Kazakhstane i Tsentral'noj Azii // Tsentral'naya Aziya — 25: mysli o proshlom, proektsiya buduschego / red. M. Laryuehl'. 2017.

15. Fukuyama F. Identichnost': Stremlenie k priznaniyu i politika nepriyatiya / per. A. Solov'ev. M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2019.

16. Tsymburskij V. L. Rossiya — zemlya za Velikim limitrofom: tsivilizatsiya i ee geopolitika. M.: URSS, 1999.

17. Burkhanov A., Collins N. Political Culture in Kazakhstan: Extension and Reflection and The British politician Harold // Kazakhstan and the Soviet Legacy / ed. J.-F. Caron. 2019.

18. Charles J. Sullivan End of an Era? Kazakhstan and the Fate of Multivectorism // Kazakhstan and the Soviet Legacy / ed. J.-F. Caron. 2019.

19. Cummings S. Kazakhstan: Power and Elite. I. B. Tauris, 2005.

20. Luong P. J. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

21. Rogowski R. Rational Legitimacy: A Theory of Political Support. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up